Mitten in der Taiping-Rebellion gegen die korrupte Qing-Dynastie, verbrüdern sich drei Rebellen und schließen sich der Armee der Qing an. Der andauernde Krieg verändert die Drei jedoch zuseh... Alles lesenMitten in der Taiping-Rebellion gegen die korrupte Qing-Dynastie, verbrüdern sich drei Rebellen und schließen sich der Armee der Qing an. Der andauernde Krieg verändert die Drei jedoch zusehens und aus Brüdern werden erbitterte Feinde.Mitten in der Taiping-Rebellion gegen die korrupte Qing-Dynastie, verbrüdern sich drei Rebellen und schließen sich der Armee der Qing an. Der andauernde Krieg verändert die Drei jedoch zusehens und aus Brüdern werden erbitterte Feinde.
- Auszeichnungen
- 18 Gewinne & 28 Nominierungen insgesamt
- General Pang Qingyun
- (as Lianjie Li)
- Jiang Wuyang
- (as Wu Jincheng)
- Gouzi
- (as Yachao Wang)
- Duan Feng
- (as Aaron Shang)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
The first problem is that most non-Chinese will have no idea what's happening much of the time unless they research into the Taiping Rebellion FIRST. While there is a prologue that gives a bit of information, it is very scant--and leaves many, many unanswered questions that you can only understand if you have read up on this era in Chinese history. Some good examples are the significance of the crucifix necklace---the viewer will have no idea where it came from or why it's there. And, who were the rebels and why were they rebelling against the Qing empire? Most importantly, who were the good guys and who weren't? Interestingly enough, who is the hero and villain overall in this rebellion seems to vary over time. During Mao's reign, he felt that the Taiping rebels were the good guys as they represented the forces of socialism (with their redistribution of the land and equality). Today, the prevailing attitude in the country seems to be that the rebels were bad because they brought disunity. ALL of this might have been interesting to learn about in the film, but alas I learned none of this in "Warlords".
Second, while the battle sequences were amazing and I was glad that they didn't make war seem bloodless (oooh, it's VERY bloody in this film!!), the film occasionally suffered from over-kill, per se. In other words, with so many battles and so much killing, the senses are overloaded and the film manages in spite of all the brutality and severed limbs to actually bore--at least it did do with me.
But, despite these serious complaints, I DO recommend you see the film--provided you read up on the facts first. It's a particularly great film to see on the big screen or on a huge plasma TV. And, the plot involving the three blood brothers is pretty interesting and the acting very good. One final important reason to see the film for weirdo purists like me is that you CAN turn off the English-dubbed version and just watch it in Chinese with English subtitles--and I appreciate that option.
Two things made be enjoy this one. For one thing, the Chinese did a pretty good job as far as giving the movie the proper epic side it needed. There's only a fine line between epic cinematography and drollery and these guys managed not to cross it, unlike, say, Gladiator or '300'.
Then, there's the acting. Having only seen Jet Li in Hollywood movies before I thought he was something of a Jackie Chan without the funny face. I stand corrected, he gives a great performance in Tau Ming Chong, he is truly believable as his character, general Pang, gradually turns into a ruthless backstabbing freak for power. Finally, kudos to the actor playing Er Hu, Andy Lau. I hope I'll get to see more of him.
Having seen the abominable blockbuster that 'The Last Samurai' really is the other night, it definitely enhanced my appreciation for this title.
I don't wanna spoil further. I want to say that i am really disappointed in the west for turning a blind eye to eastern movies in general. This movie is an epic. It deserves 20 000 votes. I cannot believe some of the movies that reach Nr 1 at the Box Office when only a relative few informed bothering with movies like this.
This is some timeless movie making.
There's little story in this movie and it's more of a background for the characters' portrayal and the battles, both of which amazingly done. The characters' portrayal is very successful due to the great acting. The battles and the fight choreography deserves a solid 9. Both artistic, like the martial arts beauty, and brutal, like real war is.
This movie doesn't have unnecessary emotion, or unnecessary gestures from main characters. That's where this movie succeeds. That's where 'Azumi' or 'Braveheart' succeeded. And that's where 'Troy' and 'Gladiator' failed to deliver. They all have great cinematography, brilliant fight choreography and superb acting staff - but that's only the technical side. 'Warlords' succeeded to deliver in all the aspects. Simple and little story with no over-dramatizing and no inconsistencies.
If one's wondering why I gave only 7, it's because, beside of Er-hu, I didn't find one likable character.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe main battle sequence had a detailed script treatment of over 20 pages and a maximum of 8 cameras rolling simultaneously.
- PatzerDuring battles, the horses fall down without being hit. Clearly they were tripped by wire.
- Zitate
General Pang Qingyun: Remember my face, so you can seek vengeance in the next life.
- Alternative VersionenThe UK version is cut by 16 secs to remove shots of cruel horsefalls.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Films of Fury: The Kung Fu Movie Movie (2011)
Top-Auswahl
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Đầu Danh Trạng
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 40.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 129.078 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 10.073 $
- 4. Apr. 2010
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 42.883.181 $
- Laufzeit2 Stunden 6 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1