What I Did for Love

James is lost & they think he drove to LA..Wasn't his car outside?

This is the story of a big city doctor (Sadie) bringing her lawyer boyfriend (Travis) home to the ranch where she grew up to meet her family (widowed dad and brothers) for the first time.

The boyfriend wants to marry her. She wants to take it slower and for her father to meet him first, even though she is convinced her dad will love him. He is a city boy and wants to make a good impression, and the family is rural as they live on a ranch. Sadie has an ex-boyfriend back in the town she grew up in who really wants to reunite with her. Everything goes wrong for the boyfriend until everything goes right in time for a happy ending with life lessons learned.

A terrible movie, even for a TV movie. The actress playing Sadie is awful. At no time did I believe Sadie was a doctor, nor did I believe she grew up on a ranch. Sadie seemed to me to be a spoiled city girl with no clue. She was a totally unlikeable character. Now, I know the movie's plot called for the boyfriend to do some stupid things out of ignorance of ranching life, but I was thinking if she was my girlfriend, knowing I was ignorant and a fish-out-of-water, and didn't take a moment to explain some things, is she the right person for me?

The boyfriend, Travis, was hapless and pathetic. A lawyer, yes. A successful lawyer, no.

Sadie is an only daughter and supposedly the father is protective of his only daughter, but mainly he came across as crusty. At least the actor playing this character had a little charisma and tried to act in his limited role.

Sadie's brothers were throwaway characters.

Sally Struthers is an Aunt who wants Sadie to reunite with Sadie's ex-boyfriend. Why? Because the plot needs a reason for the obvious one-note loser of an ex-boyfriend to show up to be the story's bad guy. The Aunt also had a slight subplot which... who cares!

Throw in some mumbo-jumbo about environmentalists and grazing rights and wolves. The writer doesn't seem to understand the issues, and if she did, she didn't let that get in the way of the story. The writer seemed to not want to offend anyone and her solution of the environmentalists buying instead of taking the grazing rights, and then the ranchers buying grazing rights elsewhere had the problem that grazing rights are associated with land and they don't make new land or new leases. I shook my head in disbelief when the solution was to take the money and buy new grazing rights somewhere else. And where would that be?

So the grazing rights solution should tick off the ranchers watching the movie. The environmentalists should be ticked off as someone in the movie is threatened by a wolf and needs to be saved. I live in Montana where the government is re-establishing wolf packs in the area (Montana, Idaho, and Yellowstone Nat'l park). What wolf supporters are saying is that wolves don't attack people. Livestock, yes. People, no. This movie and its portrayal of wolves should upset the environmentalists.

I kept thinking the movie couldn't get any worse but then they wrapped it up with a 'can't we all just be friends' happy ending. The boyfriend at the last minute was able to save the day, win a fight, bake a fretata everyone adored, and win over everyone. Surprise.

Now, I can like a clichéd movie as much as the next guy, but to ignore the clichés one needs interesting actors. The dull actors in this movie couldn't overcome the heavy handed and terrible story. The only thing I liked about this movie was a couple scenes of a sunrise/sunset that was pretty.

Avoid this movie!

"What I Did for Love" is a 2006 romantic comedy film directed by Mark Griffiths. Here's a review of the film:

"What I Did for Love" follows the story of Claire (Katee Sackhoff), a struggling actress who takes a job as a waitress to make ends meet. Her life takes an unexpected turn when she meets Jason (Adam Kaufman), a charming and wealthy attorney who mistakes her for a high-priced call girl.

The film explores themes of love, identity, and the pursuit of happiness. Claire, despite her initial misgivings, decides to go along with the mistaken identity in order to pay off her debts and pursue her dream of becoming an actress. As she spends more time with Jason, she begins to question her choices and wonders if she can ever truly be herself around him.

Katee Sackhoff delivers a charismatic performance as Claire, capturing her determination and vulnerability with ease. Adam Kaufman brings charm and sincerity to the role of Jason, making him a likable and sympathetic character despite his initial misunderstanding.

The chemistry between Sackhoff and Kaufman is palpable, and their evolving relationship is the heart of the film. As they navigate misunderstandings and obstacles, they learn valuable lessons about honesty, trust, and the true meaning of love.

The supporting cast, including Brittany Ishibashi as Claire's best friend and James Callis as Jason's friend, adds depth and humor to the story. Their interactions provide comic relief and insight into the main characters' lives.

While "What I Did for Love" follows a somewhat predictable romantic comedy formula, it manages to inject freshness and charm into the genre. The film's witty dialogue, engaging performances, and picturesque settings make it an enjoyable and uplifting watch.

Overall, "What I Did for Love" is a sweet and entertaining romantic comedy that will appeal to fans of the genre. It offers a heartfelt message about being true to oneself and following one's dreams, all wrapped up in a delightful love story.

Weak and predictable. I love the Sierra Nevada's so I continued to watch so I could see the Mountains and Mt. Whitney in some background scenes. The movie was kinda bad though. "Dad's" acting was horrible and so was Sadies. It got old fast because it was not believable at all. The night in the cave was useless and added no benefit to the film at all. Come on - Ranchers come home and unsaddle their horses and they don't notice the only horse left behind is gone - with a house guest also missing but his car is still there..And she calls and leaves him a message at this apt...Just hooky and corny. A sequel - I sure hope not. Again, the mountains were the best part of the picture! Absolutely beautiful.

Typical Hallmark movie fare...not very good...with canned, repetitive music. Only reason to have this movie on is the scenery in Lone Pine, California. This is the setting of so many great westerns. It is just beautiful.