[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
IMDbPro

Ghostboat

  • Fernsehfilm
  • 2006
  • 3 Std.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,4/10
501
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ghostboat (2006)
DramaMysteriumThriller

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA British Sub goes missing at the end of WWII, leaving only one survivor. Everyone believes it lost to the bottom of the Baltic Sea, then 40 years later it reappears without a crew. The Brit... Alles lesenA British Sub goes missing at the end of WWII, leaving only one survivor. Everyone believes it lost to the bottom of the Baltic Sea, then 40 years later it reappears without a crew. The British government sends for the one surviving crew member (David Jason), who is now a marine ... Alles lesenA British Sub goes missing at the end of WWII, leaving only one survivor. Everyone believes it lost to the bottom of the Baltic Sea, then 40 years later it reappears without a crew. The British government sends for the one surviving crew member (David Jason), who is now a marine biologist. With a new crew, Jason proceeds to trace the last known happenings on the sub. ... Alles lesen

  • Regie
    • Stuart Orme
  • Drehbuch
    • Neal R. Burger
    • Guy Burt
    • George Simpson
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • David Jason
    • Ian Puleston-Davies
    • Tony Haygarth
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    6,4/10
    501
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Stuart Orme
    • Drehbuch
      • Neal R. Burger
      • Guy Burt
      • George Simpson
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • David Jason
      • Ian Puleston-Davies
      • Tony Haygarth
    • 26Benutzerrezensionen
    • 1Kritische Rezension
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 1 Gewinn & 1 Nominierung insgesamt

    Fotos4

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung31

    Ändern
    David Jason
    David Jason
    • Jack Hardy
    Ian Puleston-Davies
    Ian Puleston-Davies
    • Travis
    Tony Haygarth
    Tony Haygarth
    • Cassidy
    Julian Wadham
    Julian Wadham
    • Captain Byrnes
    James Laurenson
    James Laurenson
    • Admiral Nealy
    Robert Whitelock
    Robert Whitelock
    • Spender
    Crispin Bonham-Carter
    Crispin Bonham-Carter
    • Redding
    Jamie Martin
    • Tyler
    Roger Evans
    Roger Evans
    • Monroe
    Robert Horwell
    • Mason
    Jonathan Cullen
    • Captain Basquine
    Alan Stocks
    • Peterson
    Lee Whitlock
    Lee Whitlock
    • Reeves
    Ricky Nixon
    Ricky Nixon
    • Langdon
    Ian Targett
    • Captain Lyle
    Tony Bluto
    • Dockyard Engineer
    Tristram Wymark
    Tristram Wymark
    • Naval Officer
    Yuri Stepanov
    • Russian Captain
    • Regie
      • Stuart Orme
    • Drehbuch
      • Neal R. Burger
      • Guy Burt
      • George Simpson
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen26

    6,4501
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    10Bulleon

    Excellent thriller, very eerie, superb acting, 10/10

    I don't tend to watch a lot of television (preferring to stick to DVDs) so something has really got to interest me to get me to firstly remember the programme's on and secondly to actually watch.

    The thing that immediately attracted me to the programme was, of course, fabulous actor David Jason. And yet again he excels himself in this wonderful thriller.

    The story is based on a book also called 'Ghostboat' and is about a submarine called the Scorpion that surfaces in 1981-but which hasn't been seen since the second world war where it was presumed to have sunk. When it sank only one survivor was found, Jack Hardy (David Jason) who can't remember anything due to amnesia) When the sub resurfaces, Hardy is invited to go on a journey on the sub, with another crew and retrace the path the Scorpion took to find out what happened to it.

    When they first go onto the sub to check out the damage and pull out the bodies of the dead, they find something astonishing. There are no bodies, everything is as the crew left it 40 years ago, nothing has changed.

    And so the journey begins. Hardy can hear voices, things are happening in the same way they did 40 years ago-and the crew are beginning to change. As Hardy says 'The past is breaking through' The CGI effects in the film are very, very good, although not perfect, the storyline is gripping, the acting and cast are stellar.

    The perfect thing for the family to gather in front of the telly to watch-10/10!
    7tatterwip

    It's not that bad ...

    Quite a lot of CGI in this piece of ITV telly, but not to the extent that it takes away from the acting or the story. In this age where people want more and more 'instant classics', this will probably not impress some people who will see it as a predictable story with an equally predictable ending. I didn't, honestly think it was a bad effort at all. David Jason can easily take-on a role such as this and make is watchable. It lends itself to the subtle chills that the stories of M.R. James deliver, and although it may not be groundbreaking it is certainly a change from the usual stock of 'Drama' that ITV dish up (i.e. detective shows, or pseudo-reality TV.) All-in-all, it was easy viewing and has a satisfying ending. Worth a look.
    9evandavies1

    Good entertainment and different role for David Jason

    A story like this will not appeal to everyone but I thought it was very original and well put together overall. A good change from the usual period dramas that come from British productions. There were some bits that could have been better with regards to acting and script but it was still entertaining. Some story points are a bit too subtle and easy to miss so might need a second viewing to fully appreciate how it all fits together. The ending was quite bold and strong which I didn't expect. The visual effects were good for a relatively low budget production and there was quite a lot of computer graphics that looked as good as from a feature film.
    5d_imdb-47

    Intriguing idea, not brilliantly executed.

    A derivative but nonetheless intriguing set up; a ship (in this case a submarine) is found many years after it sank, with no sign of the crew, or what happened to them. This has been done many times, it is essentially the story of the Marie Celeste. Despite that the set up hooked me, I love these kind of vaguely supernatural / time travel plot lines, however familiar they are.

    To be honest I was disappointed by what was delivered. David Jason is a fine actor but his character in this came over as terse, sullen and not especially interesting. As he is the lead, and therefore your focal point throughout the story, this was a big failing. He just wasn't interesting or unusual enough, you learned almost nothing about his character despite him being on screen for most of the 180 minutes.

    The plot itself seemed to peter out rather than deliver a climax, for a thriller (or at least a war time drama) I felt there was too little tension. The actual operation of the submarine and the technical side all felt very authentic but this did not compensate for the lack of plot, or genuinely interesting characters. The officers were all a little stiff, the crew were similarly generic, all of them have been seen many times before.

    Towards the end I felt the plot simply ran out of ideas and some of what happened bordered on silly. The story seemed to flirt with the premise it had created, rather than really go into it. I never felt this story got going, I appreciate it was television but there was far too much chatter. It was slow in places where it needed pace, or another twist and this was, for me at least, the other major failing; ultimately the story lacked imagination. What Ghostboat delivered was almost exactly what you expected, no more. There was no moment when I thought 'now that is interesting, I never saw that coming'.

    Despite these misgivings I thought it was not bad for a TV two parter. It was ambitious and though it failed to hit the target it was at the very least something different.
    Blueghost

    Okay made for TV sub movie.

    I just finished watching this ITV production, and all I can say is that I liked what I saw, but will note that there was room for much improvement.

    How so? Well, for one, the main vessel around which the movie focuses was a World War 2 British diesel submarine. Big deal, you say, ah, but one of the major story points is that the sub seems to operate like a modern nuclear sub, or one of the modern Nordic or Germanic subs which are quieter than either the US, UK or Soviet subs. Simply put WW2 subs stayed on the surface, and only went underwater when needed, but you'd never know that by watching this movie.

    The other thing is that there's a little bit of creep factor in this film, but it's not accentuated enough. We understand what's happening to the crew, but the made for TV production values seem to limit both SFX and other production values to really ram home the message to the audience.

    I imagine the biggest mis step taken in this film is that even though the boat as a "life of its own" so to speak, a late 20th century crew, a crew that is not trained in diesel sub operations some how manages to bring this vessel out into open ocean, and operate her like a modern nuclear powered SSN.

    Huh.

    You know, if you can get by that, and the cinematography which is a little uninspired, then you can probably enjoy watching this film, but the story of a haunted ship and her affect on the crew takes precedence over operational details and plot points.

    It's not a great film, but it is a mild diversion for a couple of hours. Give it a shot.

    Mehr wie diese

    Alarmiert
    3,1
    Alarmiert
    March in Windy City
    6,3
    March in Windy City
    72 metra
    6,5
    72 metra
    The Final Quest
    8,0
    The Final Quest
    Albert's Memorial
    6,7
    Albert's Memorial
    A Cold Supper Behind Harrods
    A Cold Supper Behind Harrods
    Yuryeong
    5,6
    Yuryeong
    Diamond Geezer
    6,9
    Diamond Geezer
    Come Rain Come Shine
    6,5
    Come Rain Come Shine
    Hunley - Tauchfahrt in den Tod
    6,6
    Hunley - Tauchfahrt in den Tod
    Only Fools and Horses: Beckham in Peckham
    7,5
    Only Fools and Horses: Beckham in Peckham
    The Second Quest
    7,8
    The Second Quest

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      The submarine used was a non-submersible full-sized replica originally built for the film 'U-571'. That model was supposed to be an American S-Class submarine modified to look like a U-boat; somewhat ironically, for 'Ghostboat' it was then modified again to play the role of a British S-Class.
    • Patzer
      Submarines of the WW2 era didn't have the now-familiar rotating radar on a circular display.

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 9. April 2006 (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigtes Königreich
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Nave fantasma
    • Drehorte
      • Cinecittà Studios, Cinecittà, Rom, Latium, Italien(Studio)
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • The Paperback Company Films
      • Yorkshire Television (YTV)
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      3 Stunden
    • Farbe
      • Color

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    Ghostboat (2006)
    Oberste Lücke
    What is the English language plot outline for Ghostboat (2006)?
    Antwort
    • Weitere Lücken anzeigen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.