Ein Chicagoer Bibliothekar hat ein Gen, das ihn zu unfreiwilligen Zeitreisen veranlasst und Komplikationen in seiner Ehe verursacht.Ein Chicagoer Bibliothekar hat ein Gen, das ihn zu unfreiwilligen Zeitreisen veranlasst und Komplikationen in seiner Ehe verursacht.Ein Chicagoer Bibliothekar hat ein Gen, das ihn zu unfreiwilligen Zeitreisen veranlasst und Komplikationen in seiner Ehe verursacht.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 5 Nominierungen insgesamt
Jane McLean Guerra
- Charisse
- (as Jane McLean)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This was much better than expected. The premise seemed far-fetched, to put it mildly. But the movie worked on a number of different levels based on the screenplay, directing, beautiful cinematography, and acting, not just of the always captivating Rachel McAdams, but also the much underrated Eric Bana as the co-lead, and the rest of the supporting cast.
The basic plot is Eric Bana (Henry) is afflicted with being involuntarily sent through time. He has no control about the time or places where he is sent. At some point, he meets with Rachel McAdams (Clare), drops in and out of her life, they fall in love and marry. However, as one can easily imagine, the downsides of involuntary time travel takes its toll. The movie could have easily have spun out of control and ended up a total mess, but the movie actually works quite nicely.
The plot could be a collaborative effort of the late Rod Serling (of Twilight Zone fame) with bizarre, science fiction type plots and Nicholas Sparks, the author of countless sticky sweet love stories (i.e. – "The Notebook").
I liked this movie, but I realize this might not be everybody's cup of tea. I would say stick with it & you'll be glad you didn't give up & go see "Halloween II" across the hall (as I was tempted to do). I've seen them both. Believe me when I say "Time Traveler" is the better of the two.
The basic plot is Eric Bana (Henry) is afflicted with being involuntarily sent through time. He has no control about the time or places where he is sent. At some point, he meets with Rachel McAdams (Clare), drops in and out of her life, they fall in love and marry. However, as one can easily imagine, the downsides of involuntary time travel takes its toll. The movie could have easily have spun out of control and ended up a total mess, but the movie actually works quite nicely.
The plot could be a collaborative effort of the late Rod Serling (of Twilight Zone fame) with bizarre, science fiction type plots and Nicholas Sparks, the author of countless sticky sweet love stories (i.e. – "The Notebook").
I liked this movie, but I realize this might not be everybody's cup of tea. I would say stick with it & you'll be glad you didn't give up & go see "Halloween II" across the hall (as I was tempted to do). I've seen them both. Believe me when I say "Time Traveler" is the better of the two.
I had read the book three times when it first came out, so I was excited when I got tickets to an advance screening. I was just hoping they didn't ruin the book. I know films can't be like the books, so I carefully did not re-read it.
They did an awesome job with the film. They captured the story, the flavor, the essence of the book, even if they did have to leave some things out. I loved the girls playing Alba.
There was laughing at the funny parts and some crying at the sad. My sister loved it. She had no intentions of reading it and only went because I had tickets. She was sniffly when we left and now has the book.
Notice to guys who like blow em ups. This is a romantic chick flick! Though the one guy I had talked to in line was crying as we left. He did say he loved it.
I would have given it a nine if some of the scenes hadn't been filmed in the dark like a lot of Hollywood.
They did an awesome job with the film. They captured the story, the flavor, the essence of the book, even if they did have to leave some things out. I loved the girls playing Alba.
There was laughing at the funny parts and some crying at the sad. My sister loved it. She had no intentions of reading it and only went because I had tickets. She was sniffly when we left and now has the book.
Notice to guys who like blow em ups. This is a romantic chick flick! Though the one guy I had talked to in line was crying as we left. He did say he loved it.
I would have given it a nine if some of the scenes hadn't been filmed in the dark like a lot of Hollywood.
Well, I am shocked and surprised. I had written this movie off as a "chick flick" and was dragged to see this by my wife as it her was her choice this week. I am glad that I went. Throughout the whole film, I was kept entertained and wanting to see the next development. Personally, I enjoyed the combination of lead actor and actress.
The concept of the film had echoes to that of Momento or The Butterfly Effect but equally different on its own merits.
The combination of characters is touching and you can really relate to this heartbreaking story.
I cried towards the ending of this film (its not a surprise, when a story gets me, I have to show emotion!)
The concept of the film had echoes to that of Momento or The Butterfly Effect but equally different on its own merits.
The combination of characters is touching and you can really relate to this heartbreaking story.
I cried towards the ending of this film (its not a surprise, when a story gets me, I have to show emotion!)
The Time Traveler's Wife is based off of one of the best books I've read in recent years. Naturally, the movie couldn't come close to catching all the little details that made the book so captivating, since like any other film it had a limited time frame he had to work with. However, the Hollywood adaptation (with Eric Bana and Rachel McAdams as the lead rolls) did do one thing right: it captured the heart of the novel and transferred much of the book's atmosphere to the big screen. Now, as much as I've always hated those original-material purists who nitpick on every little detail in a given adaptation, I have to say the work done on The Time Traveler's Wife was extraordinary loyal in spirit to the film.
Hollywood and director Robert Schwentke deserve a big kudos for not messing this one up, and for creating a big screen experience that welcomes those who loved the novel as well as newcomers to this tragic-romantic story.
I gave it 9 out of 10.
Hollywood and director Robert Schwentke deserve a big kudos for not messing this one up, and for creating a big screen experience that welcomes those who loved the novel as well as newcomers to this tragic-romantic story.
I gave it 9 out of 10.
When I entered this one, I thought it would be another Kate Hudson/Matthew McConaughey, Richard Gere/Julia Roberts,Diane Lane, wuvvy-duvvey-cutesy-wootsy boring predictable love movie.
I was completely wrong. We've all seen movies that involve time travel and this one is near the top.
It shows the reality of a relationship between two individuals who have to deal with the negative effects of time travel in a close relationship.
This movie had me near tears at the end, which is truly sad since I haven't cried since the movie Beaches.
The only thing I didn't like about this movie was that I found myself trying to figure out this mans time travel and if it made sense. There are a few loose ends left untied.
Other than that, the two leads were solid and the movie is entertaining. I wouldn't rush out to see it, but it is definitely worth renting.
I was completely wrong. We've all seen movies that involve time travel and this one is near the top.
It shows the reality of a relationship between two individuals who have to deal with the negative effects of time travel in a close relationship.
This movie had me near tears at the end, which is truly sad since I haven't cried since the movie Beaches.
The only thing I didn't like about this movie was that I found myself trying to figure out this mans time travel and if it made sense. There are a few loose ends left untied.
Other than that, the two leads were solid and the movie is entertaining. I wouldn't rush out to see it, but it is definitely worth renting.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe two girls who play Alba are sisters in real life. Tatum McCann plays Alba at four and five years old, while Hailey McCann plays Alba ages nine and ten.
- PatzerThe Calendar page for February 1984 pasted in Clare's diary has 30 days.
- Zitate
Clare at Eight: Are you married?
Henry DeTamble: Yes, I am.
Clare at Eight: Is your wife a time traveler?
Henry DeTamble: No. No, thank God.
Clare at Eight: Do you love her?
Henry DeTamble: Yes. Very much. What's wrong?
Clare at Eight: Nothing. I was just hoping you're married to me.
- VerbindungenFeatured in The Rotten Tomatoes Show: Taking of Pelham 123/Imagine That/Moon (2009)
- SoundtracksLove Will Tear Us Apart
Written by Ian Curtis, Peter Hook, Stephen Morris, and Bernard Sumner
Performed by Broken Social Scene
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Te amaré por siempre
- Drehorte
- Osgoode Hall, Toronto, Ontario, Kanada(Library in Chicago)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 39.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 63.414.846 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 18.623.171 $
- 16. Aug. 2009
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 101.344.412 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 47 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
What was the official certification given to Die Frau des Zeitreisenden (2009) in Spain?
Antwort