IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,4/10
47.151
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein Wikingerjunge wird zurückgelassen, nachdem sein Clan gegen einen Indianerstamm gekämpft hat. Vom Stamm aufgezogen, wird er zum Retter im Kampf gegen die Nordmänner.Ein Wikingerjunge wird zurückgelassen, nachdem sein Clan gegen einen Indianerstamm gekämpft hat. Vom Stamm aufgezogen, wird er zum Retter im Kampf gegen die Nordmänner.Ein Wikingerjunge wird zurückgelassen, nachdem sein Clan gegen einen Indianerstamm gekämpft hat. Vom Stamm aufgezogen, wird er zum Retter im Kampf gegen die Nordmänner.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Wayne Charles Baker
- Indian Father
- (as Wayne C. Baker)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I wasn't expecting much when I started watching this, but that quickly changed thanks to the brilliantly lit scenes and grainy, pensive mood of filming. The acting, as well as the violence was well above average in quality and brutality respectively, and the story was refreshingly original.
I believe three things could have elevated this movie to brilliance: 1. A more sweeping, bold orchestral soundtrack. 2. More sweeping, cinematic shots to give us short escapes from what, at times, became a claustrophobic atmosphere. 3. Authentic native language with subtitles, as was given the Vikings. I realize the choice not to do so (point #3) was probably based on perceived audience appeal, or perhaps even on the psychological identification with the "good guys", but it would still have added an element of greatness.
Overall I give Pathfinder 8 out of 10 stars for originality, brooding (amazingly refreshing) filming, and an authentic truthfulness in telling what was a simple but bloody tale of revenge. I also appreciated the fact that the film took itself seriously, and did not toss in a heap of "humorous" moments that so many current action movies seem to rely on. This movie was relentless in its pursuit of telling a dark and bloody tale and, for the most part, succeeded in providing an excellent couple hours of escape.
I believe three things could have elevated this movie to brilliance: 1. A more sweeping, bold orchestral soundtrack. 2. More sweeping, cinematic shots to give us short escapes from what, at times, became a claustrophobic atmosphere. 3. Authentic native language with subtitles, as was given the Vikings. I realize the choice not to do so (point #3) was probably based on perceived audience appeal, or perhaps even on the psychological identification with the "good guys", but it would still have added an element of greatness.
Overall I give Pathfinder 8 out of 10 stars for originality, brooding (amazingly refreshing) filming, and an authentic truthfulness in telling what was a simple but bloody tale of revenge. I also appreciated the fact that the film took itself seriously, and did not toss in a heap of "humorous" moments that so many current action movies seem to rely on. This movie was relentless in its pursuit of telling a dark and bloody tale and, for the most part, succeeded in providing an excellent couple hours of escape.
This is pretty good B-movie. If you want subtle plot and dialog then you should have figured out from the trailer and the poster that this show is not for you.
Yes, it appears to be inspired by a Frazetta painting (see Death Dealer) and is surely derivative of Conan and Tarzan. But how long has it been since a good Conan or Tarzan movie.
Lots of gore, lots of decapitations (but as Joe Bob would say, all necessary for the plot) lots of low key lighting to make the special effects easier to pull off but then again, it's not a chick flick.
If only we still had drive in movies.
Yes, it appears to be inspired by a Frazetta painting (see Death Dealer) and is surely derivative of Conan and Tarzan. But how long has it been since a good Conan or Tarzan movie.
Lots of gore, lots of decapitations (but as Joe Bob would say, all necessary for the plot) lots of low key lighting to make the special effects easier to pull off but then again, it's not a chick flick.
If only we still had drive in movies.
While the story is good, the flaws begin to stand out.
Yes, all the little things that should have been important to the filmmakers in production and in filming.
Like - airplanes in the sky.
It seems to be winter or early spring but snow doesn't stick to anything, nobody's face or skin turns overly cold or white or purple due to it. Snow doesn't turn to water when collecting on anybodies's face, the pelts they wear do not freeze after they fall through ice into the river Natives have very straight, clean teeth and very clean hair and skin - even after going through battle.
Vikings wear heavy amour but move swift, fast and easily through the forest.
Climbing the edge of a mountain, nobody is freezing wearing virtually no clothing.
There are tire tracks in the mud.
Even though a slew of swords are used and arrows are shot, no horses get injured.
There are a bunch of things like that - after watching the movie, just begins to make you wonder how this can be thought out and actually given an OK.
Snow that blows all over the place, but in some areas of open space, there is none and then several feet away there is several feet of it.
Caves with light coming in from all directions.
Swords that seem to weigh as much as a can of pop - being easily flung across a field or lifted and swung without much force or effort.
I can go on,but I won't.
Yes, all the little things that should have been important to the filmmakers in production and in filming.
Like - airplanes in the sky.
It seems to be winter or early spring but snow doesn't stick to anything, nobody's face or skin turns overly cold or white or purple due to it. Snow doesn't turn to water when collecting on anybodies's face, the pelts they wear do not freeze after they fall through ice into the river Natives have very straight, clean teeth and very clean hair and skin - even after going through battle.
Vikings wear heavy amour but move swift, fast and easily through the forest.
Climbing the edge of a mountain, nobody is freezing wearing virtually no clothing.
There are tire tracks in the mud.
Even though a slew of swords are used and arrows are shot, no horses get injured.
There are a bunch of things like that - after watching the movie, just begins to make you wonder how this can be thought out and actually given an OK.
Snow that blows all over the place, but in some areas of open space, there is none and then several feet away there is several feet of it.
Caves with light coming in from all directions.
Swords that seem to weigh as much as a can of pop - being easily flung across a field or lifted and swung without much force or effort.
I can go on,but I won't.
Pathfinder was not nearly as bad as many people are making it out to be. True, the editing was mediocre at best, with the seasons clearly out of whack. There were some pretty odd incongruencies with language as well. The filmmakers relied on some trite Native American imagery and stereotypes...
But Pathfinder was obviously never about the plot or silly Viking outfits. Ultimately I think the filmmakers wanted to impress upon the viewers the starkness of the landscape of "uncivilized" North America, and how the people who lived there survived. One of the best lines in the movie is delivered when Ghost tells his lady friend that the Vikings know eternal winter, but "don't know our spring." I think the movie, in its own kind of botched way, did a good job conveying the awe, reverence and fear that the people who lived in N.A. had for the seasons and the natural environment.
But Pathfinder was obviously never about the plot or silly Viking outfits. Ultimately I think the filmmakers wanted to impress upon the viewers the starkness of the landscape of "uncivilized" North America, and how the people who lived there survived. One of the best lines in the movie is delivered when Ghost tells his lady friend that the Vikings know eternal winter, but "don't know our spring." I think the movie, in its own kind of botched way, did a good job conveying the awe, reverence and fear that the people who lived in N.A. had for the seasons and the natural environment.
This movie was gorgeous and everything I ever wanted in a "Viking" lands on North America film. I thought this film was very underrated and with the Judd Apatow dreck that gets called film-making these days this really stands up in beauty and depth of story. The cinematography of the Northwest coast was amazing and incorporating the dense forests and lush environments into the shooting process was simply amazing.
The acting was perfect and at times understated in wonderfully blocked scenes between the characters. I thought the action is unmatched by many films pretending to be the action blockbusters they are often sold as. I often marveled at the length in which the filmmakers brought the setting to us no matter how difficult the set-ups seemed.
I hope he keeps making films for years to come! Beautiful!
The acting was perfect and at times understated in wonderfully blocked scenes between the characters. I thought the action is unmatched by many films pretending to be the action blockbusters they are often sold as. I often marveled at the length in which the filmmakers brought the setting to us no matter how difficult the set-ups seemed.
I hope he keeps making films for years to come! Beautiful!
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe Native Americans the Vikings encounter historically were the Beothuk people of Newfoundland in Canada. There is a large historical site around the Viking settlements in Newfoundland for tourists to visit.
- PatzerWhen Ghost is shown as a child in the flashback, his back is severely cut from his whipping, yet, when the film moves ahead to him as a adult, there is no scarring of any type on his back, yet, the amount of trauma his back suffered would have left some degree of obvious scarring.
- VerbindungenEdited into Pathfinder: Deleted Scenes (2007)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Pathfinder
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 45.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 10.232.081 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 5.001.214 $
- 15. Apr. 2007
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 30.984.583 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 39 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen