Pandora's Paradox

Despite the fact that I worked as DP/Camera Op on the film, it was still quite a shock to see the end result and the end result is definitely weird. Although the story may not appear to make a whole lot of sense, Matt always seemed to have a very detailed vision of what he wanted to put down on film. So even though many of the images may seem random, everything from the toe to the lighting was very thought out.

When I step back and watch the film as a whole (and not focus on the lighting or camera movements) there are things I like and dislike.

Once you get past the overall absurdity of the film, you can actually link the images to real life and use them as a kind of metaphor. From there, a story does begin to emerge albeit shaded in the bizarre. (But it's an experimental horror movie so cmon!)

The acting is great. A little over the top and sometimes forced (which should be expected) but very solid. Esp. the little kid who I'm sure many of you would be surprised to learn had never acted prior to this film.

Matt'direction is energized and loaded with style. He trusts his actors and knows when to let them steal the scene and not the camera, SFX etc. Even lighting. At the same time there is somewhat of a lack of focus in the films' presentation(directing, editing). Come end time, the film is far too long and could have benefited from having at least 7 minutes axed.

The sound for me was the biggest problem. It was too amateurish and hokey and didn't match the overall dark yet slick feel of the film. The no lip sync was OK, but the random and poorly dubbed sound effects coupled with the tacky Mario Bros. music became a distraction. Oh well.

The lighting of course was great but the direction for a lot of it came from Matt's weird head. I boned up on some Itallian horror to help with getting the feel right, making sure I could translate what Matt had on paper onto film.

Overall, Pandora's Paradox is a solid yet bizarre film combining Lynch and Argento with Matt's own twisted ideas. Whether or not you enjoy the movie (and a lot of people will not)I feel that you can't deny the production value of the film coupled with the fact that at the very least it's crazzzzy eye candy.

2rights

PANDORA'S PARADOX is a great film that crawls under your skin without the help of dialogue. It uses the universal visual language of cinema to tell a tale of secret desires, control, manipulation, death and rebirth. Good and evil are not portrayed as opposing values, but as the reflection of each other, bouncing over Matthew Saliba's carefully developed characters. For the viewer, the film feels like it's 10 minutes long. If I judge by its reception at the Fantasia International Film Festival, film goers love it. Matthew Saliba is a talented filmmaker and I hope he will continue exploring symbolism and metaphors in cinema and continue to develop his unique style. His blend of personal, yet universal issues and crude (in your face) treatment with wild, creative imagination is not ordinary fare. This makes him an extraordinary filmmaker.

A horror film that you need a psychology degree to appreciate??? Sure, it wouldn't hurt, if you're looking to gain a deeper understanding of the subtle nuances of this almost half hour assault on the brain, but it's not necessary. Many of the themes expressed are basic human emotions and fears, but when forced to confront these demons of human experience is where the real horror lies. It may take a few viewings to really grasp just what Matthew Saliba has to say, but the knowledge he imparts is well worth your time, if you can make sense of it.

When a woman gives birth to a giant severed thumb/toe creature in a room full of bloody weapons, you know you've really stepped into something bizarre. And when the father of the thumb-kin accidentally hatches it by pouring milk over its cuticle, you truly know that there is no turning back. The child, now seemingly fully grown into a teenager, brings his mom the thumb cocoon, which she lovingly turns into soup, before helping the boy's father to perform some kind of Frankensteinesque experiment. The doctor makes an appearance next, feeble assistants who aren't quite human in tow, all leading up to some strange ass visuals including a meatloaf mask, a pick axe wig splitting, and a return to the womb.

As I said above, a fluent knowledge of Freud and Jung isn't compulsory to enjoy the imagery, but it really does help when trying to ascertain the underlying story that makes up the crux of Pandora's Paradox. We are handed everything from Oedipal complex to matricide, and more psychoanalysis than an FBI profile of a serial killer. If these kinds of things excite you, then by all means, dive in and enjoy, but if you're looking for a more straightforward horror flick, this might be a little too cerebral for you. If you happen to fall into the latter category, I'd suggest dusting off your David Cronenberg DVDs and watching those for the umpteenth time.

a complex, non-narrative 20+ min. experimental film, "pandora's paradox" has a really

interesting set of scenes, like a woman giving birth to a giant, bloody toe, an unforgettable

sex scene, and its impossible climax, which makes this film really stand out. very inventive

camera shots and effects are used, and it's one of the very few "art films" that make you want

to watch it over and over!

some may say that "pandora's paradox" is weird and inexplicable, but if you have an open

mind, you'll quickly understand the general feeling of the film: betrayal, an urge for

normalcy, and revenge. this director can go places!

This film made me so very angry. Like a gruesome train wreck, this film is definitely captivating ... in the worst kind of way. As you watch, you realize that you will never get those 24 minutes back.

The film, contrary to some opinions, is a random jumble of pseudo-psychological images and scenes laden with tacky Freudean cues. This is simply weird for the sake of being weird--not some deep, insightful treatise. This is someone's idea of what a "post-modern" short student film is supposed to be. There is no real substance here. Notice that the previous reviewer, Rick Hancox, claims that there is a "strong message" though he neglects to mention what that may be. No offense to Mr. Hancox, he is much more optimistic than I.

This film is offensive, in that the people involved in making are obviously talented people with some ability at making films. However, this ability is squandered on such trite, self-indulgent crap.

Please, for the love of God, don't subject yourself to this. Unless you are interested in knowing what Alex de Large must have felt like after undergoing "therapy" in "A Clockwork Orange".