In ascolto

The movie gives out lots of interesting factoids about the Echelon spying system that the plot revolves around, which a subsequent web search proved to be largely accurate (or, at least, largely accurate according to one of the various hypotheses about the system).

I found the acting to be fairly weak and unconvincing, especially the lead bad guy, but others as well. At points the acting had me thinking I was watching some kind of B movie, although there were enough decent actors to keep me wondering.

At several point plot issues had me going "Yeah, right." While you can let them slide on technology issues (although one piece of technology that plays a major role in the plot, which supposedly dates back half a century, is particularly questionable), it was often the characters' reactions to the situations they were in that had me wondering "Who would actually do that if they were in such a situation?"

Overall, though, the movie kept me entertained but the draw backs only allow me to give it a Luke warm recommendation, although I'd recommend it more strongly to conspiracy theorists and others who dig this kind of thing.

I saw this beautifully shot film recently.... to be honest I was expecting to watch a good thriller, pass a couple of hours and that's about it. What I discovered was an incredibly fascinating story where, wonder of wonders, I actually felt I was learning something valuable without being preached to...

But the biggest surprise was how moving, honest and sensitive the performances were .... and most of all - how visually stunning the film was.. I was taken on a journey through all the atmospheric 'landscapes', both literal and metaphorical.

Great stuff! A quiet but powerful film. The Listening is undoubtedly one of the best movie surprises of 2006.

Like something out of the pages of "The National Enquirer", "The Listening" is entertaining, as long as you don't let facts get in the way of a good story. After all, the best science fiction, is believable science fiction. Michael Parks goes up against the government's National Security Agency and a private corporation supplier, trying to save an innocent Italian woman from their abusive silencing techniques. Though the movie has it's flaws in the logic department, the intriguing subject matter overcomes any glitches in the story. If you are one of those people who is paranoid about "big brother" listening, this is a film you might want to avoid, because it will definitely strike a nerve. - MERK

A mediocre spy flick, not worth the last hour, this movie could have been a lot better with better editing, to liven it up and make it a good chunk shorter. It takes a nose dives and stalls somewhere in the middle, despite its realistic plot line.

Michael Parks did a great job as an actor, there were other good performances from some others in the cast, however I had trouble finding the character of Francesca believable because her emotions sometimes conflicted with the scene she was in.

As far as this one goes, i would avoid it and watch something like SpyGame, its a little more far-fetched but at least it wont put you to sleep (yes i think the government has the Tech to screen every phone call) As to you crackpots out there rating this movie a 10, how can this movie be everything that every other movie is not, and worth a perfect score?

This is a remarkable film about hair-raising (fictional?) abuses of the notorious eavesdropping system called 'ECHELON', which is operated by the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States, with a major listening post in the north of England. The French title of the film is LE PROJET ÉCHELON ('The Echelon Project'), and THE LISTENING is the title of the English language DVD. Although the film is an Italian production, it was apparently shot in English (perhaps the Italians got a dubbed version in their language, as they do not seem to mind dubbing in Italy). It is the first and only feature film directed by Giacomo Martelli, and perhaps after exposing Echelon, 'he can never work again' in the international film scene? Most recently (2010-2012), he has directed an Italian TV series entitled 'ANTIMAFIA SQUAD – PALERMO TODAY'. So he is clearly not afraid to make enemies of the most dangerous people in the world, that is obvious. (For those visiting Palermo, if you wish to see the Mafia Headquarters, it is an enormous building in a low-lying and rather deserted section of the old part of town disguised by heavily sheeted scaffolding all around it so that from the outside it appears to be a derelict building, and the lights inside at night cannot be seen from the street. Indoors, there are Renaissance paintings on the walls and plenty of luxurious features, even an appallingly bad-taste restaurant of extreme high prices nearby where the girlfriends can be taken, dripping in diamonds.) This excellent film makes a full-frontal attack on the way multi-national corporations are becoming increasingly enmeshed in the security apparatus of America, as well as other states of course. Since this film came out, much more has been revealed in the media about private contractors with private armies paid for by the American taxpayers, who are unaccountable both financially and in terms of lines of command, and which have run out of control in the most alarming manner. Some of the combat duties in Iraq, for instance, were out-sourced to private companies, and that caused a scandal, but one which was quickly suppressed. There is nothing remotely implausible about the story of this film, and it may well be an under-representation of the problem. The Echelon system, which has been well known for a long time and has doubtless been superseded now by far more sophisticated systems evolved from it, monitors all worldwide telephone and other electronic communications using banks of super-computers. When key words are spotted, or key voices are recognised, the system automatically alerts the human operators. The reason the system is called 'Echelon' is that it does this in ascending steps of a hierarchy of alert. If someone mentions 'terrorist attack', that might be a level one alert triggering a more intense automated scrutiny, but if someone mentions 'terrorist attack next week', that might jump to level four, and require a human listener. The supposed justification for this monster eavesdropping system is 'protection against attack', which goes to show that paranoia is the ruling political principle these days, and any scepticism expressed about 'the terrorist threat' has now itself become 'a threat'. It's like trying to make a joke at airport check-in that you don't have a bomb in your bag: you will immediately be hauled off and interviewed for hours, so don't be tempted to have a sense of humour anymore because it has become 'politically incorrect', and there might as well be a sign on the current White House lawn which says: 'jokers will be persecuted', and even thinking of stepping on the grass has now become a hate crime. One day, when airport systems are fitted with 'thought detectors', and don't forget we are already being photographed naked by devices which see through our clothes, we will all be in danger of arrest if we think of the wrong political party when boarding a plane. It is already dangerous to suggest that a large proportion of the world's politicians might be psychopaths, since there is nothing a psychopath hates more than being identified as what he is. Psychopaths can manipulate the LIBOR rate, lie to Parliament and take a nation to war, pass a Patriot Act which no one in Congress has read, and order every conversation in the world to be listened to, and no one will do anything about it. Banks can launder billions of dollars of drug and terrorist money a year and just received a slap on the wrist when exposed. The lunatics took over the asylum so long ago that there are few people alive who are old enough to remember a sane world (if such a thing ever existed, of course). This film has a brilliant central performance by the actor Michael Parks, who plays a very low-key, aging and depressed expert who has worked for the NSA for 30 years. He is a traditionalist who believed in 'serving his country'. But when arrogant corporate toadies invade his premises with instant high security clearances and start threatening his bosses and himself and saying 'don't you know that I can have you fired?', he cracks. When he sees that they are trying to kill an innocent woman in Italy because she accidentally came across something which might threaten a $400 million deal, he goes rogue, flies to Italy to save her, and tries to expose the new system called 'Tumbleweed' and the way in which everyone in the world is threatened by psychopathic corporate people. The entire film is done in a very under-stated style, with no hyperbole, and without unnecessary and silly Bourne-style action sequences. See it and tremble. Much of it is shot in the deep snow on the top of Mont Blanc, at 11,000 feet, which does have a chase sequence over the crags. The suspense throughout is very intense. This film is really worthwhile.