Life on a Stick

OK some people may not get this and i understand that but i actually can't stop laughing at this. And it's not like i'm some stupid 10 year old. I'm 16. It may be that people don't find the show intelligent enough but it's not meant to be intelligent. It's aimed at people who just want to laugh for a half hour. I just don't know how you couldn't find anything in this funny cause me and my friends laugh at everything in this show. some people may say the show is immature but i think that's the fun in it. Freds one-liners are enough to keep the show running from start to finish in my opinion. And the randomness in this comments are fantastic. Hope this was helpful.

I love this show. Amy Yasbeck and Matthew Glave turn in solid performances as the parents, Rachelle LaFevre is a decent female lead, Charlie Finn is a funny sidekick, Maz Jobrani is a hilarious supporting actor as Mr Hut, and Zachary Knighton and Paige Thompson are brilliant stepsiblings.

The lines are brilliant, and Laz (Knighton) and Molly (Thompson) are easy to care about. This is a funny, sympathetic show that shows what a not-quite-adult comedy should be like. People compliment That 70s Show and Saved By The Bell as the apogee of that genre, but, especially for a show only having had one season, this blows them away.

If the humour is graduate meta humour, so be it, I loved this show. Very, very, VERY impressive.

I loathe- absolutely cannot endure- teen 'comedy' crass. I actually cringe when I change the channel and something like That 70's Show, According to Jim, or My Wife and Kids comes up. It has always shocked me that one genre can be so absolutely void of creativity, wit and intellect. Honestly, they are so predictable and weak it's a wonder they thrive the way they do.

So when my inability to go to sleep at a respectable time has me surfing late night television- though my expectations aren't high- I shudder when I land on what I immediately identify as teen crass. The well lit, obviously-a-set set, attractive young adults, and slight overacting; it's all there. I linger to hear and gauge the next punchline, to see whether it's worth my late night infomercial time.

I only had to wait a minute before realising that this show *actually* incredibly funny and intelligent; the responses to situations were so creative. The plot progressions were interesting, mature and quirky-- things only a week ago I would have died before associating with teen sitcoms.

This was the most original show of it's kind, and actually accessible to common youths. This is why I was appalled to see it get a pathetic 4.5 on this site-- oh my god, are you all insane? THAT 70'S SHOW HAS 8.4. That's EIGHT POINT FOUR. There is no way its stupid, bland humor can compare to the wit and intelligence of Life on a Stick. (Just for perspective, The Matrix has a rating of 8.6!) I know I couldn't write with the creativity and freshness of LoaS, and that's why I like it- it's a new experience.

The show was amazing, but it is more what it represented that had me so excited. A slap in the face to the commercial media that every day underestimates its audiences with the unintelligible crap it spews forth.

I can't believe it was axed. Cheap formulas. Unprovoking. Unchanging. Stagnation. I weep for our youth.

Laz (Zachary Knighton) and the dim-witted Fred (Charlie Finn) are best friends out of high school and working at the mall food court under the mean-spirited Mr. Hut. Laz is in love with fellow worker Lily (Rachelle Lefevre). His father Rick Lackerson is married to his step mom Michelle (Amy Yasbeck). His angry stepsister Molly (Saige Thompson) likes Jasper but he already has a girlfriend.

I like Laz, his idiot friend and Lily. They're a marginally funny trio. Being in the pretzel booth is funny. Laz's parents are distractingly unfunny. It's like Amy Yasbeck is trying too hard. Also this should try to be more of a teen show. Comedic parents get into the way. Molly is adorable angry cute teen but it's a struggle to keep her connected with the trio. She ends up sitting at the food court for unnaturally extended amount of time. It's an uneven marginally funny sitcom.

OK, OK...here's my claim to fame. I would like to coin a new phrase to describe this show's delivery style. It has a bizarre and perhaps refreshing way of using one-liners or zingers as a way of displaying or developing a story or scene by the sole use of one-liners or "zingers".

The "action" is developed almost exclusively by setting up an endless array of punchlines into one long, connected line. The characters reveal their sardonic personalities by minimalist snippets.

You might think it is one-liner heaven or hell. It's a matter of opinion. The whole feeling is surreal, post-modern and a panoply of pastiches and almost stifling to experience.

After 30 minutes, one comes away with the feeling that we've just seen 10 hours of one-liners in virtual time.

Not sure if it will work with most people because one might become weary because of it continually peaking.

You decide....if this "Zing-Com" is worth the time.