[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
IMDbPro

Screaming Dead

  • Video
  • 2003
  • R
  • 1 Std. 28 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,9/10
505
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Erin Brown in Screaming Dead (2003)
Slasher HorrorHorror

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuSleaze photographer Roger Neale and three beautiful models take up residence in a reportedly haunted old building - an ideal location for Neale's photographic "study in terror."Sleaze photographer Roger Neale and three beautiful models take up residence in a reportedly haunted old building - an ideal location for Neale's photographic "study in terror."Sleaze photographer Roger Neale and three beautiful models take up residence in a reportedly haunted old building - an ideal location for Neale's photographic "study in terror."

  • Regie
    • Brett Piper
  • Drehbuch
    • Brett Piper
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Rob Monkiewicz
    • Rachael Robbins
    • Erin Brown
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    3,9/10
    505
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Brett Piper
    • Drehbuch
      • Brett Piper
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Rob Monkiewicz
      • Rachael Robbins
      • Erin Brown
    • 21Benutzerrezensionen
    • 16Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Fotos

    Topbesetzung10

    Ändern
    Rob Monkiewicz
    Rob Monkiewicz
    • Sam Rogan
    Rachael Robbins
    Rachael Robbins
    • Maura Holloway
    Erin Brown
    Erin Brown
    • Bridget
    • (as Misty Mundae)
    Joseph Farrell
    • Roger Neale
    Heidi Kristoffer
    Heidi Kristoffer
    • Lauren
    C.J. DiMarsico
    • Jennifer
    Kevin G. Shinnick
    • Rossiter
    A.J. Khan
    A.J. Khan
    • Model in Opening Sequence
    Sylvianne Chebance
    Sylvianne Chebance
    • Receptionist
    Marc Gettis
    • Doc
    • Regie
      • Brett Piper
    • Drehbuch
      • Brett Piper
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen21

    3,9505
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    7unbrokenmetal

    Devil inside

    This is a clever little horror flick and clearly underrated. It demonstrates the idea of split personality when the photographer Roger (Joseph Farrell) meets his 'alter ego' Rossiter (Kevin Shinnick). Whereas the photographer only arranges scenes with the girls that scare them, but don't actually hurt them, the devil in him breaks out and then takes the job to the extreme. Transformed into Rossiter, Roger may at last torture and kill.

    Some reviews below give me the impression most people take movies much too literally, so I elaborate a bit of the transformation idea. Check out 1:00:47 when Roger discovers Rossiters machine. Fascinated, he pulls the lever and says "this is ingenious"! We shall see Rossiter stand at the machine later just like that. Check out 1:10:41 when a hand seems to reach out of Rogers brain (or rather: mind) and smashes him against the door so that he 'dissolves' into an unrecognizable pulp. But when in 1:16:00 Sam Rogan enters the room, there is no body on the floor. Roger has disappeared - he was replaced by Rossiter.

    Roger was still full of excuses (his artistic purposes), fear and restrictions. His released inner demon knows nothing of this and just does what Roger may only have had (wishful or terrifying) fantasies about. The actually scary idea behind the movie is therefore that once you lose control, you'll never be the same again. If that involves covering Misty Mundae in red paint, it may however seem negotiable ;-)
    2masercot

    It Might've Been Worse

    Certainly, if the movie carried a specifically designed tone to make the viewer's heads explode it would've been worse. Actually, halfway through, I was praying for such a tone. I've never fast-fowarded through a nude scene before this movie, but the dialog voided out the excitement from the nudity.

    Misty Mundae is an attractive woman; however, it takes more than beauty to save this movie. It would take all the best doctors in the east to save this movie and, even then, I doubt it could be anything more than something to separate channel 357 from 359.

    Well, that was what was bad about the movie. What follows is what was good about the movie:
    4nikmaack

    Cheesier Than A Cheese Pizza With Extra Cheese

    If you like bad, low budget, unintentionally funny films, seek no more. This is the movie for you.

    It has nudity, some horror, and really bad acting. The special effects are embarrassing. For example, a nude woman receives a series of "cuts", and it looks like someone just squirted red paint on to her body. There is no cut of any kind. She's just being basted in tobasco sauce.

    Yes, it's shlock. Shlocky shlock. Super shlocky shlock.

    At best, you'll laugh. There were some scenes where I laughed out loud. Not because the film was funny, but because the film was so very bad.

    At worst, you'll become bored and shut off the movie. There were a few times I was tempted to do so, but I waited out my boredom, and was rewarded with more terrible dialogue, needless nudity, ridiculous special effects, and filming mistakes. Hooray!

    The film stars Misty Mundae. Having never heard of her before, I laughed when I saw her name in the credits. The moniker has "soft core porn star" written all over it. The bonus material to the DVD assures me she is a famous horror movie actress who has been in many magazine articles -- Fangoria, for example. And she has, they assure me, "star quality".

    Well, no. She doesn't. Not really. But she is willing to take off all her clothes. She is sort of cute, I guess, if scrawny and small.

    Rob Monkiewicz plays the male hero, Sam Rogan, and he's amazingly bad. He delivers is lines like he's delivering a pizza -- each sentence comes coated in Luke warm cheese, served in a cardboard box. More than once, his hamfisted lines made me giggle. He's supposed to play a muscle bound romantic, but comes across as a bouncer who occasionally "acts".

    Now you know what you're in for -- bad, bad, bad, bad film. But so bad it can be entertaining. Get your friends together, get drunk, and maybe you'll enjoy the film. Watch for the scene where a crew member is accidentally filmed by the doorway. Laugh as the mike once again swings into the scene. Boggle at computer special effects that you would be embarrassed to use as a screen saver.

    This, my friends, is a great, bad film.
    5etale

    Let down by the script

    I liked the acting and the directing in this film, but, alas, the script left a lot to be desired. First of all, do you really think that Neal would have as much clout, considering the subject matter of his photographs? I have my doubts that they would end up in all those prestigous galleries, if they did, I'm sure that feminists would picket them or they might be shut down by the authorities for indecency (Can you imagine if he tried to show in Cincinatti, for example?). I would say that if Rogan got fired for telling off Neal that he could take his ex-boss to court and press charges against both of them. After all, I'm sure that even New Jersey must have laws against this type of "art." As it is, the acting, photography and the directing was quite well done, especially considering this being a low budget film, but the script left my suspension of disbelief hanging there.
    3fibreoptic

    So bad that it's bad and will remain bad even while drunk.

    From the get go i could tell that this movie was going to be like Hell Asylum. It's amateurish with bad acting and cheapy crappy effects. The story is kind of good but of course was never pushed in the right direction. The characters kept saying how creepy and spooky the place was and that it was an old abandoned asylum or something. Abandoned? The place didn't have a spec of dust and it looked quite modern. Bare yes but old and abandoned it wasn't. Whoever scouted for a location for this movie sucked.

    I'll briefly give the story. It's about a successful photographer who combines art with bondage and S&M. He's a real sleaze bag and rents a place so he can work on his art with 3 female models and his female assistant but are also joined by a big hulking ug ug kinda guy who works for an estate agency or something and has to oversee this guy for insurance purposes (it's kind of hazy). But needless to say there's an evil ghost in this place.

    I watched this while having a few beers and i'm sorry but Screaming Dead is in a word 'dead' and no way could you ever say that this film is so bad it's good! It's so bad it's bad! Apart from a potentially good story gone to waste and nice looking women there's not much good about this movie. There's only one gore effect in it too. I'm giving it an extremely generous 3/10 for reasonable but wasted story, nice looking girls and one good gore effect.

    Mehr wie diese

    The Barn: Part II
    5,3
    The Barn: Part II
    Bite Me!
    4,8
    Bite Me!
    Splatter Beach
    3,5
    Splatter Beach
    Curse of the Fourty-Niner - Die Rache des Jeremiah Stone
    3,6
    Curse of the Fourty-Niner - Die Rache des Jeremiah Stone
    The Lost
    5,8
    The Lost
    Spookt
    4,7
    Spookt
    Vampire Vixens
    3,4
    Vampire Vixens
    Shock-O-Rama
    5,7
    Shock-O-Rama
    Fright Flick
    3,8
    Fright Flick
    My Vampire Lover
    3,8
    My Vampire Lover
    SpiderBabe
    4,1
    SpiderBabe
    Sin Sisters
    4,1
    Sin Sisters

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      This film was shot on location at an old abandoned sanitarium in Marlboro, New Jersey.
    • Zitate

      Maura Holloway: Has it occurred to you that you're not the only one that cares about those girls? Maybe I'm sticking around to make sure that things don't go too far!

      Sam Rogan: They already have gone too far.

      Maura Holloway: Well maybe I'm making sure they don't go too further!

      Sam Rogan: Too further?

      Maura Holloway: Yeah.

      Sam Rogan: God you're cute.

    • Verbindungen
      Referenced in The 100 Scariest Movie Moments (2004)

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 30. März 2004 (Vereinigte Staaten)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Кричащие мертвецы
    • Drehorte
      • Marlboro, New Jersey, USA
    • Produktionsfirma
      • E.I. Independent Cinema
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 28 Min.(88 min)
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Stereo
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.33 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.