[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Code 46

  • 2003
  • 12
  • 1 Std. 33 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,1/10
21.570
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Tim Robbins and Samantha Morton in Code 46 (2003)
A futuristic Brief Encounter, this is a love story in which the romance is doomed by genetic incompatibility.
trailer wiedergeben1:50
1 Video
99+ Fotos
DramaRomanzeScience-FictionThriller

Der futuristische Brief Encounter (1945) ist eine Liebesgeschichte, in der die Romanze durch genetische Unverträglichkeit zum Scheitern verurteilt ist.Der futuristische Brief Encounter (1945) ist eine Liebesgeschichte, in der die Romanze durch genetische Unverträglichkeit zum Scheitern verurteilt ist.Der futuristische Brief Encounter (1945) ist eine Liebesgeschichte, in der die Romanze durch genetische Unverträglichkeit zum Scheitern verurteilt ist.

  • Regie
    • Michael Winterbottom
  • Drehbuch
    • Frank Cottrell Boyce
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Tim Robbins
    • Samantha Morton
    • Om Puri
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    6,1/10
    21.570
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Michael Winterbottom
    • Drehbuch
      • Frank Cottrell Boyce
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Tim Robbins
      • Samantha Morton
      • Om Puri
    • 171Benutzerrezensionen
    • 113Kritische Rezensionen
    • 57Metascore
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 4 Gewinne & 10 Nominierungen insgesamt

    Videos1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:50
    Official Trailer

    Fotos102

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 94
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung32

    Ändern
    Tim Robbins
    Tim Robbins
    • William Geld
    Samantha Morton
    Samantha Morton
    • Maria Gonzales
    Om Puri
    Om Puri
    • Bahkland
    Togo Igawa
    Togo Igawa
    • Driver
    Nabil Elouahabi
    Nabil Elouahabi
    • Vendor
    Sarah Backhouse
    • Weather Girl
    Jonathan Ibbotson
    • Boxer
    Natalie Mendoza
    Natalie Mendoza
    • Sphinx Receptionist
    Emil Marwa
    • Mohan
    Nina Fog
    Nina Fog
    • Wole
    Bruno Lastra
    Bruno Lastra
    • Bikku
    Christopher Simpson
    Christopher Simpson
    • Paul
    Lien Nguyin
    • Singer in Nightclub
    David Fahm
    David Fahm
    • Damian Alekan
    Jeanne Balibar
    Jeanne Balibar
    • Sylvie
    Mick Jones
    Mick Jones
    • Self
    Taro Bahar
    Taro Bahar
    • Jim
    • (as Taro Sherabayani)
    Nina Sosanya
    Nina Sosanya
    • Anya
    • Regie
      • Michael Winterbottom
    • Drehbuch
      • Frank Cottrell Boyce
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen171

    6,121.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    BigHardcoreRed

    Possibly A Scary Look At What The Government Will Be Telling You What You Can Do Next.

    This one is billed as a love story set in the "near future". I got the idea it was more of a one night stand set in the near future, considering the main character, William (Tim Robbins), was married with a son waiting back home. William is a government investigator and the girl that he fell in love with, Maria (Samantha Morton), was the person in particular that he came out to investigate.

    This movie starts in a similar fashion as I, Robot, with just a definition and the law of what exactly a Code 46 is. It's kind of the same way police codes work today whereas a 187 is a homicide, etc. A Code 46 is, in a nutshell, if two people share the same "genetic identity" (read - DNA), anywhere from 25% to 100% the same, they are not permitted to conceive a child. Any pregnancy resulting from a Code 46 must be "terminated". If the parents were ignorant of their genetic identities, then medical intervention is authorized to prevent a further occurrence of a Code 46 (this was similar to the whole plot of Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind where they medically make you forget who this person is and any involvement you had with him) and last, but not least, if any two people of the same genetic identity knowingly commit a Code 46, then that is a criminal offense.

    That being said, you can almost guess the entire basic story but there are other little things in the movie that almost certainly have to be watched again to catch everything. I turned on the movie before I was ready to commit my full attention to it and found myself playing catch-up the rest of the time, so make sure the film has your full attention.

    The world here seems a little bit like in Demolition Man, but more realistic and less intense. You need what is called a "papelle" in order for you to enter a real city through a checkpoint and if you do not have one, you are doomed to stay outside of any major cities. In reality, this was more similar to Tijuana. They were mobbed by people selling fruits or whatever to anyone that stopped near them, etc., which was a more likely realistic future than that of Demolition Man.

    Also, the language and people were more of a melting pot around the world. Just about everyone primarily spoke English, but no one said "Thank you", it was "Gracias" and other little things of that nature.

    Tim Robbins style in this movie reminds me of Jeff Daniels for some reason. I think it is his voice acting, there's not much else to act with here and I really think he came out looking kind of stale. Samantha Morton looked like Sinéad O'Connor and not very attractive, but I believe her performance was a little more believable, although not great.

    With all that in mind, you really have to be in the right mood to watch this. It's definitely a movie that you have to think about to understand what is happening and you can't just sit with a tub of popcorn and be entertained. Take that in consideration and decide for yourself if this is your type of movie. I honestly did not care for it, but can appreciate the little things that went on in the movie and I realize that just because it isn't for me, it is still pretty good. 7/10
    MichaelCarmichaelsCar

    Warmth in a Cold World

    'Code 46' is the most beautiful film I've seen in quite some time. It's funny how something entirely new is produced when the properties of film noir and futuristic sci-fi are married. Like 'Until the End of the World,' 'Strange Days,' and 'Gattaca,' three films which 'Code 46' potently recalls, this is above all else a mood piece, wherein character and plot are secondary to the drifty, elegiac flow of the film.

    The action is underplayed, and the performances have an earthy tone; Tim Robbins recalls William Hurt in 'Until the End of the World' and Bill Murray in 'Lost in Translation,' in that his perpetual jet lag has cultivated an easy, weary charm. The movie is set, one gathers, in the future (or an "alternative present," to paraphrase another reviewer). Like the best futuristic films, it's set on the same planet Earth, but the planet's simply been restructured; the old occupants have left and the new ones have moved in. No longer are there countries, only cities, only business destinations.

    Pleasure is not a goal, but a side effect. The locations photographed are, as in 'Alphaville,' as in 'Sans Soleil,' not manipulated or artificial, but they are photographed in a new way. Contemporary cities look futuristic, commercial, busy, cold, with pools of dark glass and beads of light from skyscraper windows. For me, this kind of imagery is the among the most romantic and evocative. Cold, impersonal environments like these simultaneously forbid and necessitate human warmth. Intimacy becomes something to escape into.

    Michael Winterbottom and his screen-writing partner Frank Cottrell Boyce have done great work before, and inevitably, a lot of viewers and critics are dismissing 'Code 46' as a number of things, including listless and convoluted, but I think that's symptomatic of approaching this film with the wrong expectations. Far beyond simply being a trivial footnote in what will hopefully be a career of formidable longevity, I think 'Code 46' is perhaps Winterbottom's best work yet, the movie I intuited Winterbottom had dormant in him. The movie has a sort of purging effect, like Wenders' 'Until the End of the World,' and as with that film, my immediate environment felt different to me, changed, upon exiting the theater.
    8The-Proph

    Why this film is 'real'

    I loved this film! It was (to my cinematographically uncultured palate, at least) different, and the characters seemed quite unconventional. Rather than just hollow acting, I found Tim Robbins' character to be a mental curve ball, which completely altered the way the film played out. It hinted at the socialisation and culture prevalent at the time.

    I also enjoyed the (much-disputed) foreign terms slipped into the conversation - they weren't too frequent, and added a dimension - that there had been purely aesthetic as well as techno/political changes. As English becomes more dominant and other languages in the minority (and therefore more culturally significant), it is likely that foreign terms will be leaked, from the age-old Caucasian tradition of borrowing culture if nothing else.

    I also loved the fact that the cityscapes were all filmed to imply the future, rather than CG'd or whatever.

    The storyline was innovative, and there were many dead-ends which fleshed out the story and made it less linear. Unlike some, I easily followed the storyline, and I'm rather confused that some people felt that it didn't seem to touch on Code 46 itself much.

    Interesting concepts, combined with a sense of triviality surrounding much of the technology, helped to create a more textured world, and while nothing was really explained, the evidence was there for you to draw your own conclusions. If you like thinking, definitely watch this film.

    ~pr0ph37~
    8netgrazer

    Pleasing lack of visual noise

    I liked how the movie didn't scream at me, trying to deafen me with whatever kind of message the actors and director wanted to convey... I had to work a little bit to see what there was to be seen - which I like, and I found the lack of CGI and laser guns thoroughly refreshing. The pace was right, and the music fit the mood of the movie.

    The movie as a whole has a distinct human quality like I used to enjoy in those 50's sci-fi stories the way Philip K. Dick could write them. The same atmosphere that's usually gone in Dick's flashy Hollywood rewrites.

    The intercultural lingo is a lot of fun to listen to, it's not too tacky and not too overdone, it sounds almost natural to me.

    All in all a good 8 out of 10 stars from me. If there was more of a puzzle to be solved throughout the film (it does have you wonder where things are going in the beginning) I would have probably rated it even higher, because I like my stories a little mysterious and not too straightforward. I can imagine that some people find the acting slightly too bland for their tastes, but I feel it's far better to err on the side of caution than to produce another vehicle for overacting and improbable characters.
    5quillfiller

    Xlnt moody shots, subtle and restrained FX but poor storyline.

    First of all I was impressed by the moody shots of Shanghai and the other locations used. Almost had that Blade Runner feel for planting you in a believable future. So many films of this genre, and with massively higher budgets, often fail to achieve the lightness of touch shown here. Not the usual obviously nailed-on FX, but instead subtle and credible gizmos with the personalised touch, like Maria's cuckoo-call tone and graphics on her personal organiser that William uses when trying to find her. And the Esperanto-style combination of phrases everyone uses, from Spanish, French, Chinese etc could easily be envisaged in years to come.

    But what really let it down ultimately was the story. Just at the point where you wanted the narrative to move up a gear, instead it just hung there and became a bit self-indulgent. The actors made an excellent job of an often dull script. Maybe the writer couldn't think how to end it. A shame, as it was an opportunity squandered in my opinion.

    I got the feeling that Frank Cottrell Boyce, though coming up with some thought - provoking ideas in this film and having done excellent work elsewhere, possibly needed to have collaborated with another writer that could have injected some pace and fresh perspective just at the point the film ran out of steam. I'm a great fan of Michael Winterbottom's (especially on "Jude")evocative and atmospheric camera-work, but that alone couldn't salvage the film from ultimately being disappointing.

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      Code 46 refers to the twenty-two chromosome pairs, plus the two sex chromosomes in human beings.
    • Patzer
      The numerous seeming "errors in geography" are actually an intentional artistic choice. Because the film is set in a future where global cultures have become thoroughly merged, Michael Winterbottom purposely blended footage shot in Shanghai, Dubai and Rajastahn so that Shanghai has a desert outside it, etc.
    • Zitate

      Maria: Oh, you have a kid?

      William: Yeah.

      Maria: Chico or chica?

      William: Chico. Jim. His name's Jim.

      [shows her his photo]

      Maria: I bet he's very special.

      William: He is special.

      Maria: Everybody's children are so special. It makes you wonder where all the ordinary grown-ups come from.

    • Crazy Credits
      There is a looped animation running next to the names during the final credits. It shows a variety of things, including chromosomes, chromosome replication, and chemical structures.
    • Verbindungen
      Featured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: Collateral/Code 46/Stander/Little Black Book/Festival Express (2004)
    • Soundtracks
      No Man's Land
      Written by David Holmes

      Published by Universal/Island Music Ltd

      Performed by David Holmes

      Courtesy of Polydor UK Ltd

      Licensed by kind permission from the

      Universal Film and TV Licensing Division

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ20

    • How long is Code 46?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 3. März 2005 (Deutschland)
    • Herkunftsländer
      • Vereinigtes Königreich
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Offizieller Standort
      • Official site (United States)
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Kod 46
    • Drehorte
      • Dubai, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • BBC Film
      • British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
      • Kailash Picture Company
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Budget
      • 7.500.000 $ (geschätzt)
    • Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
      • 285.585 $
    • Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
      • 20.170 $
      • 8. Aug. 2004
    • Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
      • 886.018 $
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 33 Min.(93 min)
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Dolby Digital
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 2.35 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.