IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,9/10
2372
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Im Mittelpunkt stehen vier Freunde, die zu Buchmachern werden, nur um dann festzustellen, dass ihre Welt gefährlich außer Kontrolle gerät, wenn ihre Gier die Aufmerksamkeit des organisierten... Alles lesenIm Mittelpunkt stehen vier Freunde, die zu Buchmachern werden, nur um dann festzustellen, dass ihre Welt gefährlich außer Kontrolle gerät, wenn ihre Gier die Aufmerksamkeit des organisierten Verbrechens auf sich zieht.Im Mittelpunkt stehen vier Freunde, die zu Buchmachern werden, nur um dann festzustellen, dass ihre Welt gefährlich außer Kontrolle gerät, wenn ihre Gier die Aufmerksamkeit des organisierten Verbrechens auf sich zieht.
Dominic Boeer
- Buzz Cut
- (as Dominic Böer)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This past Tuesday, While taking in the whole "Sundance experience," I got up early to see Mark Illsley's "Bookies." I was very disappointed, and would have been well served to sleep in. I recall the buzz that surrounded Illsley a few years ago (Happy Texas), and was very curious as to how he would follow up that... project. I should have left it at curiosity.
I'm not sure where exactly to begin, and I'm not going to do a point by point analysis here. My overarching feeling is that I dont' understand why this film was made. It just seems so pointless. I won't blast the acting, because a few performances were ok, and frankly, an actor can only work with what a script writer provides. The script was extremely weak and the film uncreative and obvious. Oooh - another mob related plotline! How original! I don't see how this film will find an audience, let alone be profitable. I don't even see this as a straight to video release.
My chief disappointment lies in the fact that the subject matter is very compelling. A fantastic film could be made on this subject matter. With the Superbowl right around the corner, I am reminded of how many Americans gamble - of how much money is at stake throughout an NFL season. Sure, some of that money is wagered legally in Vegas, but the lion's share of dollars at stake in "middle America" is certainly not bet through Vegas or even an offshore casino. There are people out there somewhere taking action and living a lifestyle I am curious about. Illsley's characters are not these people. And don't tell me about how the mob is out there to take back its turf. My twelve year old son could have done better(that's actually not as bad as it sounds - he is a very talented writer for a twelve year old).
Although I think this film is weak on its own merits, my chief criticism of the film is relative to the huge potential that is left on the table. I would be surprised to see this film obtain a distribution deal, particularly with the other quality films out there currently seeking such arrangements. Sorry - I hate to post negative thoughts, but this had to be said. Nothing is sadder to me than unrealized greatness.
I'm not sure where exactly to begin, and I'm not going to do a point by point analysis here. My overarching feeling is that I dont' understand why this film was made. It just seems so pointless. I won't blast the acting, because a few performances were ok, and frankly, an actor can only work with what a script writer provides. The script was extremely weak and the film uncreative and obvious. Oooh - another mob related plotline! How original! I don't see how this film will find an audience, let alone be profitable. I don't even see this as a straight to video release.
My chief disappointment lies in the fact that the subject matter is very compelling. A fantastic film could be made on this subject matter. With the Superbowl right around the corner, I am reminded of how many Americans gamble - of how much money is at stake throughout an NFL season. Sure, some of that money is wagered legally in Vegas, but the lion's share of dollars at stake in "middle America" is certainly not bet through Vegas or even an offshore casino. There are people out there somewhere taking action and living a lifestyle I am curious about. Illsley's characters are not these people. And don't tell me about how the mob is out there to take back its turf. My twelve year old son could have done better(that's actually not as bad as it sounds - he is a very talented writer for a twelve year old).
Although I think this film is weak on its own merits, my chief criticism of the film is relative to the huge potential that is left on the table. I would be surprised to see this film obtain a distribution deal, particularly with the other quality films out there currently seeking such arrangements. Sorry - I hate to post negative thoughts, but this had to be said. Nothing is sadder to me than unrealized greatness.
This is what every school going teenager dreams of. i always thought the Netherlands where missing out on a lot. we don't have school campuses here in the Netherlands, i love the idea of living on one over these. Doesn't matter if you see it in the movies or hear from people who studied in the us, the stories always sound amazing. This is one of the amazing examples what teenagers whit an idea and enough balls can accomplish. to bad they had to give it up. and "Rachael Leigh Cook"...what a FOXX!!!!
My Final conclusion; It's a easy to watch, entertaining & exciting story. well played by the actors. Love to see a part 2 on this movie.
My Final conclusion; It's a easy to watch, entertaining & exciting story. well played by the actors. Love to see a part 2 on this movie.
I really tried to like this film; I wanted it to be a success. But some weak characters kept the film from rising above a kid fantasy movie. It had little relation to real-life college gambling or real-life bookies (both of which I unfortunately became far too familiar with while living in Union CIty in the early 1970s. Galecki was a bit over the top, and one rooted for him to get shot. Stahl, on the other, was a sympathetic character, who was the voice of reason, while Luke Haas was pretty much just a third wheel in the film. The character of Hunter was also underdeveloped and suffered from poor dialog as the romantic interest. David Proval was pretty good as the older bookie, but his partner and strong-arm, Vincent, played by the competent John Diehl, was highly unrealistic as a bookie's arm. Most bookies I knew were loners, who operated on their own without strong-arms. So that device did not work well.
The story line was interesting, but once again, depending on the school (I went to Columbia U, which had no shortage of rich and powerful students with money), the volume of sports betting was just not that heavy. Most bets were between $10-$50, and the idea of a player throwing a game has been done a few times before; most notably in The Gambler, with James Caan. Occasionally, a good business student would go off the deep end and start betting $100s of dollars, but not thousands, and certainly not the amounts mentioned in this film. I would say the film was a good try, but no cigar. Because of the realism factor.
The story line was interesting, but once again, depending on the school (I went to Columbia U, which had no shortage of rich and powerful students with money), the volume of sports betting was just not that heavy. Most bets were between $10-$50, and the idea of a player throwing a game has been done a few times before; most notably in The Gambler, with James Caan. Occasionally, a good business student would go off the deep end and start betting $100s of dollars, but not thousands, and certainly not the amounts mentioned in this film. I would say the film was a good try, but no cigar. Because of the realism factor.
Bookies sometimes feels like a tv-movie but that doesn't mean it was a bad movie. It's just not a high budget movie, again nothing wrong with that, but it made it look like it was ready to be aired on television and nothing else. The story isn't bad though, it's easy to watch and the acting was decent. Johnny Galecki finally plays in something else than that dumb show The Big Bang Theory (never got what all the fuss was about with that show), and he did okay. I wouldn't categorize this movie in the comedy genre though. Comedy is supposed to make you laugh and this was clearly not the case in Bookies. It's just easy entertainment, an easy to follow story with an interesting subject of gamblers and bookies.
Just watched this movie for the first time today... This film had a good mix of funny moments and tense moments. Nick Stahl and Johnny Galecki stand out the most, I didn't really follow the whole betting bookie thing cause I'm not into that stuff. This is still a fun film to watch...the back of the box literally says "A COOL FILM" And it is!
Wusstest du schon
- SoundtracksBaby's Come Back
Written by Fridtjof Riege Nilson, Jarle Norman Bernhoft and Frederick Wallum Rod
Performed by Span
Courtesy of Universal Music Publishing
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Bookies?Powered by Alexa
- Can anyone explain why this film was made in Germany with English spoken, presumably for release in the US and UK?
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Букмекери
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 8.500.000 CA$ (geschätzt)
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 28 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen