Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA dramatisation of the true story of Doctor Harold Shipman, a general practitioner from Hyde, Manchester, who was convicted in 2000 of murdering fifteen of his elderly patients and is suspec... Alles lesenA dramatisation of the true story of Doctor Harold Shipman, a general practitioner from Hyde, Manchester, who was convicted in 2000 of murdering fifteen of his elderly patients and is suspected of having murdered as many as two hundred others.A dramatisation of the true story of Doctor Harold Shipman, a general practitioner from Hyde, Manchester, who was convicted in 2000 of murdering fifteen of his elderly patients and is suspected of having murdered as many as two hundred others.
Mary MacLeod
- Ivy Lomas
- (as Mary Macleod)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I thought that James Bolam played the part of Dr Frederick Shipman very sensitively and he certainly did the best he could with what must have been a tough role.
The setting for the drama was very good and the scenes representing Christmas 1997 were very good. I think it caught the atmosphere of the whole thing very well.
The humour displayed by James Bolam was very authentic to the real Dr Shipman and the sense of theatre he displayed to some patients in his surgery was true to the real character which I guess must have been relatively easy for the actor to do as he is so familiar with playing in comedy.
I particularly liked the confrontations between Dr Shipman and the police as well as the interview scenes.
The high-light of James Bolam's acting in my opinion came when he broke down after being confronted with the computer evidence and we see him crying and clinging to his solicitor's legs. This was an excellent piece of acting.
2 hours was not long enough as there was so much that could have been covered and one got the feeling that it had been rushed a little, and maybe the programme makers had found it difficult to know just where to start.
I found it intriguing and sad as well. It made you think about the case and yes, maybe it did supply some understanding into how the tragedy came about.
The setting for the drama was very good and the scenes representing Christmas 1997 were very good. I think it caught the atmosphere of the whole thing very well.
The humour displayed by James Bolam was very authentic to the real Dr Shipman and the sense of theatre he displayed to some patients in his surgery was true to the real character which I guess must have been relatively easy for the actor to do as he is so familiar with playing in comedy.
I particularly liked the confrontations between Dr Shipman and the police as well as the interview scenes.
The high-light of James Bolam's acting in my opinion came when he broke down after being confronted with the computer evidence and we see him crying and clinging to his solicitor's legs. This was an excellent piece of acting.
2 hours was not long enough as there was so much that could have been covered and one got the feeling that it had been rushed a little, and maybe the programme makers had found it difficult to know just where to start.
I found it intriguing and sad as well. It made you think about the case and yes, maybe it did supply some understanding into how the tragedy came about.
This drama retraced some of the murders commited by primary care physician Harold Shipman in the Manchester area of the UK in the late 90s. Shipman was convicted of injecting his patients with lethal doses of diamorphine. Despite the highly unusual number of deaths in his practice his actions went unnoticed for a long period of time, and even now the authorities are unsure about the number of people that he may have killed. The film is low key, and does not attemot to provide any insight or reasoning into Shipman's motives, it simply documents the events as recorded in court transcripts. Nevertheless it is a powerful film; James Bolam a stalwart of light comedy in the UK is well cast. The film has caused some controversy here, as it has been shown on television before the inquiries into Shipman have been completed. Relatives of those who died tried to prevent the film been shown at this stage. On balance the events are documented as sensitively as possible; and the drama is good if very very uncomfortable viewing.
A fantastic reenactment of the Shipman case. Portrayed wonderfully by everyone involved. A definite must watch if you like old British tv.
A pretty good dramatization of how Doctor Harold Shipman finally fell under suspicion and was caught.
The production values are pretty basic but everything is well acted and the sets and locations all look pretty run of the mill and pretty realistic.
The programme takes a bit of dramatic licence obviously having to fill in many blanks.
Shipman is portrayed as charming, authoritative and highly respected and trusted. There seems little to no reason to doubt any thing he says. A few locals have doubts about the high death among his patients, many of them elderly but in excellent health and spirit. Shipman explains though that he has many patients in his surgery and that sadly death from old age does happen. Characters who do raise concerns are left looking foolish and crestfallen. Shipman continually exercises a caring bedside manner and is upheld as a pillar of the community. There's even some fantastic corpse acting.
The other main character in the story is a detective coming up for retirement who is first put onto the case when a forged will comes to light. Slowly they begin to uncover a mountain of evidence that there is a serial killer in their area. Shipman though seems able to offer a plausible defence and it's by no means certain they can prove his guilt.
The case is so famous that there's no point in trying to leave it a mystery so we know right from the beginning what he's up to. In the first scene he starts filling out the death certificate before he's even killed the victim. The drama uses a lot of actor with strong local Manchester accents to keep things feeling real.
The programme never really tries to answer the question of why he did what he did. I don't suppose we'll ever know. It seems to have had little to nothing to do with money. Nor do we know why he targeted elderly women. Was it because their deaths would be less suspicious? Was it because he had a special reason for wanting them dead. We'll never know....
Most of the acting is very good, there's just one or two extras who are truly wooden. The detective also sits down and discusses the case with a member of the public too over a drink in one scene. Pretty implausible.
Some critics will also feel maybe that this drama is exploiting an awful true story for entertainment.
The production values are pretty basic but everything is well acted and the sets and locations all look pretty run of the mill and pretty realistic.
The programme takes a bit of dramatic licence obviously having to fill in many blanks.
Shipman is portrayed as charming, authoritative and highly respected and trusted. There seems little to no reason to doubt any thing he says. A few locals have doubts about the high death among his patients, many of them elderly but in excellent health and spirit. Shipman explains though that he has many patients in his surgery and that sadly death from old age does happen. Characters who do raise concerns are left looking foolish and crestfallen. Shipman continually exercises a caring bedside manner and is upheld as a pillar of the community. There's even some fantastic corpse acting.
The other main character in the story is a detective coming up for retirement who is first put onto the case when a forged will comes to light. Slowly they begin to uncover a mountain of evidence that there is a serial killer in their area. Shipman though seems able to offer a plausible defence and it's by no means certain they can prove his guilt.
The case is so famous that there's no point in trying to leave it a mystery so we know right from the beginning what he's up to. In the first scene he starts filling out the death certificate before he's even killed the victim. The drama uses a lot of actor with strong local Manchester accents to keep things feeling real.
The programme never really tries to answer the question of why he did what he did. I don't suppose we'll ever know. It seems to have had little to nothing to do with money. Nor do we know why he targeted elderly women. Was it because their deaths would be less suspicious? Was it because he had a special reason for wanting them dead. We'll never know....
Most of the acting is very good, there's just one or two extras who are truly wooden. The detective also sits down and discusses the case with a member of the public too over a drink in one scene. Pretty implausible.
Some critics will also feel maybe that this drama is exploiting an awful true story for entertainment.
I found this to be a pretty good movie based on a real serial killer. The movie shows the events of Harold Shipman on how he kills people with lethal doses and the motive on why he does it. James Bolam does a great job playing as Harold on how he portrayed the character as a cold blooded killer who doesn't show any remorse on what he doing to his victims. The other actors did a great job with their performance in the movie too. It also shows how the authorities slowly realize there's something strange going on with these series of deaths that happening around town and start to suspect Shipman.
Harold Shipman: Doctor Death is a pretty good crime movie.
Harold Shipman: Doctor Death is a pretty good crime movie.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesJohn Hurt was offered the title role but declined because he thought the project was distasteful.
- PatzerThe cross on the grave site of Bianka Pomfret had her year of death as 1999 yet following the exhumation the plaque on her coffin revealed her date of death as 10th December 1997 - not 1999 as engraved on the cross.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen