IMDb-BEWERTUNG
7,3/10
275
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe wife of a Foreign Office diplomat discovers a body in the drawing-room of her house in Kent.The wife of a Foreign Office diplomat discovers a body in the drawing-room of her house in Kent.The wife of a Foreign Office diplomat discovers a body in the drawing-room of her house in Kent.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Agatha Christie wrote numerous novels and short stories. She wrote this one as a play. Its original title, "Clarissa Finds a Body", more closely captures its mood, its spirit, and its off-center sense of humor. gridoon2016 commented that it isn't much of a movie. That much is true. Plays must follow a different set of rules and constraints than movies do. You have to judge it on its own merit. Long ago I learned the three jobs of a critic:
To explain: 1. What was done? 2. Was it done well? 3. Was it worth doing?
The first point is easy. It's a classic Agatha Christie murder mystery, drawn directly from the genre that made her famous. Its structure is predictable the way most classic murder mysteries are predictable.
As for was it done well, its mood differs from most of its genre because it has tongue firmly planted in cheek throughout, right from the opening wine-testing sequence. Christie originally wrote the play for an actress who was tired of playing "heavies". She wanted something fun. This masterpiece definitely qualifies. Penelope Keith in the starring role brings to it that level of sarcasm and fun, infused with a bit of panic from time to time. So the plot takes a fresh look at a familiar genre.
Was it worth doing? It's a diversion. It's fresh and it's familiar -- a good combination. It's fun. It's suspenseful. And the ending should satisfy most murder-mystery buffs.
So give it a chance. But be a little patient. Plays often take a little longer than movies to set themselves up, and this one is no exception.
Incidentally, I also have a copy with the Tammie Grimes introductions. Like many program decisions, this one offers yin and yang. On the positive side, it gives you much more information about Christie and her work and about this play. On the negative side, Grimes' sides interrupt the flow of the narrative. Which version is better is entirely a matter of personal taste. But give it a chance. It's worth it.
To explain: 1. What was done? 2. Was it done well? 3. Was it worth doing?
The first point is easy. It's a classic Agatha Christie murder mystery, drawn directly from the genre that made her famous. Its structure is predictable the way most classic murder mysteries are predictable.
As for was it done well, its mood differs from most of its genre because it has tongue firmly planted in cheek throughout, right from the opening wine-testing sequence. Christie originally wrote the play for an actress who was tired of playing "heavies". She wanted something fun. This masterpiece definitely qualifies. Penelope Keith in the starring role brings to it that level of sarcasm and fun, infused with a bit of panic from time to time. So the plot takes a fresh look at a familiar genre.
Was it worth doing? It's a diversion. It's fresh and it's familiar -- a good combination. It's fun. It's suspenseful. And the ending should satisfy most murder-mystery buffs.
So give it a chance. But be a little patient. Plays often take a little longer than movies to set themselves up, and this one is no exception.
Incidentally, I also have a copy with the Tammie Grimes introductions. Like many program decisions, this one offers yin and yang. On the positive side, it gives you much more information about Christie and her work and about this play. On the negative side, Grimes' sides interrupt the flow of the narrative. Which version is better is entirely a matter of personal taste. But give it a chance. It's worth it.
A brilliant adaptation of Agatha Christie's comic-thriller with a cast led brilliantly by Penelope Keith. It is a must for any fans of the author looking for a classic Christie!
10GoUSN
Being a mystery buff since childhood, Agatha Christie's books to me are all masterpieces of the genre and perhaps beyond. Their startlingly astute human observations, their pearls of wisdom, and their well-defined main characters (even without knowing their backstories) add up to perfection, with depth but not inscrutable depth.
With all that background, I somehow had never heard of this work or this film.
What a revelation. Entertaining characters and exceptional acting, all in the great tradition of literate British film. Let the Marvel fantasy universe entertain the children. We adults can delight in writing that doesn't take us for imbeciles and actually took some effort and work.
I learned it was written as a stage play, which would explain the very few foibles in the script and story line.
This is a delightful little work and a perfect film for those thinking they've seen all of the fine Christie cinematic works.
A 10.
With all that background, I somehow had never heard of this work or this film.
What a revelation. Entertaining characters and exceptional acting, all in the great tradition of literate British film. Let the Marvel fantasy universe entertain the children. We adults can delight in writing that doesn't take us for imbeciles and actually took some effort and work.
I learned it was written as a stage play, which would explain the very few foibles in the script and story line.
This is a delightful little work and a perfect film for those thinking they've seen all of the fine Christie cinematic works.
A 10.
This UK television adaptation of Dame Agatha Christie's 1954 West End hit is a lot of fun and a great way to spend a stormy night. Equal parts mystery and comedy, it tells the story of house-wife Clarissa's trials and tribulations when an unexpected body turns up at exactly the wrong time (as if there's ever a RIGHT time!!)
TV fans will recognize the marvelous Penelope Keith from GOOD NEIGHBORS and TO THE MANOR BORN, and she is as fabulous as ever as the slightly muddled Clarissa.
The producers wisely elected to give the teleplay a cozy period setting and it would make a nice addition to any Christie collection if it were ever released commercially. Here's hoping.....
TV fans will recognize the marvelous Penelope Keith from GOOD NEIGHBORS and TO THE MANOR BORN, and she is as fabulous as ever as the slightly muddled Clarissa.
The producers wisely elected to give the teleplay a cozy period setting and it would make a nice addition to any Christie collection if it were ever released commercially. Here's hoping.....
Any Monogram Charlie Chan film from the 1940s is more cinematic and faster-moving than this talkathon-boreathon, which barely qualifies as a film; it really is just a piece of filmed theater - and poorly filmed, at that (for example, there is a scene where it takes 5 minutes for 3 men to accept that there is a dead body in the room - even though the body can be easily seen from the point where they are standing). As the characters talk....and talk....and talk.....and talk....without getting anywhere, it is very tempting to start doing other things while the film drones on at the background. But do tune in for the unmasking of the killer in the last 10 minutes, which is actually chillingly well-done. Penelope Keith is lively in the lead, but she is surrounded by a bunch of stiffs (no pun intended) - excepting the killer's performance in the aforementioned climactic scene. ** out of 4 for that scene alone.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThis was watched by 5.4 million viewers on its original transmission, making it the second most popular programme of the week on BBC2.
- VerbindungenRemake of Spider's Web (1955)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen