[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
IMDbPro

The Void

  • Video
  • 2001
  • 12
  • 1 Std. 33 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,8/10
791
IHRE BEWERTUNG
The Void (2001)
Science-FictionThriller

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA ruthless CEO holds a whistle blower captive when she tries to stop a top-secret particle acceleration experiment she fears may create a black hole on earth.A ruthless CEO holds a whistle blower captive when she tries to stop a top-secret particle acceleration experiment she fears may create a black hole on earth.A ruthless CEO holds a whistle blower captive when she tries to stop a top-secret particle acceleration experiment she fears may create a black hole on earth.

  • Regie
    • Gilbert M. Shilton
  • Drehbuch
    • Geri Cudia Barger
    • Gilbert M. Shilton
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Adrian Paul
    • Amanda Tapping
    • Andrew McIlroy
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    3,8/10
    791
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Gilbert M. Shilton
    • Drehbuch
      • Geri Cudia Barger
      • Gilbert M. Shilton
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Adrian Paul
      • Amanda Tapping
      • Andrew McIlroy
    • 29Benutzerrezensionen
    • 6Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Fotos5

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung18

    Ändern
    Adrian Paul
    Adrian Paul
    • Prof. Steven Price
    Amanda Tapping
    Amanda Tapping
    • Prof. Eva Soderstrom
    Andrew McIlroy
    • Oscar
    Lauren K. Robek
    Lauren K. Robek
    • Christine Marshall
    • (as Kirsten Robek)
    Roger Cross
    Roger Cross
    • Detective
    • (as Roger R. Cross)
    Michael Rivkin
    Michael Rivkin
    • Dr. Jason Lazarus
    French Tickner
    • Dr. Soderstrom
    Malcolm McDowell
    Malcolm McDowell
    • Dr. Thomas Abernathy
    Desiree Zurowski
    Desiree Zurowski
    • Grace
    Carlton Watson
    • Phil
    Apollonia Vanova
    Apollonia Vanova
    • Tech #1
    Martin Budny
    Martin Budny
    • Tech #2
    Ulla Friis
    Ulla Friis
    • Tech #3
    • (as Ulla Fris)
    Frank Cipriano
    • Larry
    Adam Murphy
    • Adam
    Liduina Vanderspek
    • New Tech #2
    Trevor Roberts
    Trevor Roberts
    • NewTech #3
    Matthew Sulzle
    Matthew Sulzle
    • MOW
    • (Nicht genannt)
    • Regie
      • Gilbert M. Shilton
    • Drehbuch
      • Geri Cudia Barger
      • Gilbert M. Shilton
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen29

    3,8791
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    xsgerry

    Comes close to the real world scenario with the RHIC

    This film addresses a real concern of sorts, questions which were brought up about the Heavy Relatavistic Ion Collider which used a particle accellerator to smash gold atoms together in order to study exotic quarks. It was theorized that only a one in a billion trillion squillion chance of creating a particle-sized singularity (infinite volume in zero mass) that creates black holes, gravitational wells and event horizons. So much for media scares. Why actually watched 10 minutes of the film was because I like Amanda Tapping. I then watched another ten minutes because all of a sudden she was apparently geting tastefully nude. After another ten minutes I turned off again. I think it may have been a body double, but who cares. Amanda Tapping is gorgeous, no matter whose breasts were on the screen. The film? Ah. Well, if it was made with a big budget and heavyweight hollywood actors, say, Harrison Ford and Susan Sarandon, it would be considered worthy, though provoking material. A shame a proper, real science story has been let down by poor budgeting, and the fact that Amanda Tapping is marvellous, but not well known enough for film work. On the other hand, nice breasts.
    bbbl67

    It was a good idea...

    ...but it was poorly fleshed out. The writers of the movie obviously had a technical background, because they were pretty close to reality about black hole physics. And the idea about what could possibly happen if someone created a black hole right on earth, is a very fascinating question. Unfortunately, using this idea as the basis for a movie plot by itself, doesn't seem to be enough, so they threw in a romance, a bunch of murders, etc., etc.

    I'd love to see this idea resurrected in some other, higher-budget movie, one day. But then in such a movie they may get the scientific principles wrong, but come up with better romances and political murders.
    alvoss04

    Not bad for an obviously low budget production.

    I watched this movie only because Amanda Tapping was cast in it. Although she did show great acting skill and proved beyond a doubt that she is NOT a bimbo, I was disappointed by the obvious use of a body double for the brief nude scenes. I hope Amanda will get an opportunity to star in a higher budget movie soon and that she will not be so shy about nudity. From a scientific standpoint, this was a plausible movie. From a point of reality it is a bit foolish. For example, when they are both tied to chairs and expecting to be executed, the dialogue and behavior seemed unreal. Amanda's character showed conviction and perseverance to show the data error, but then surrendered so easily when captured. Just not consistent behavior for the character. This movie is a must see for all Star gate fans, as the movie does prove Amanda's acting skills.
    5FieCrier

    abuse of science thriller marginally OK, not worth looking for though

    There's no black hole sucking down a city street as depicted on the video box cover, so let's dismiss that from the start. There's something sort of like that in the floor of a laboratory.

    As it starts, a particle accelerator lab is doing an experiment that its chief does not approve of, but which the physicist played by Malcolm McDowell has somehow pulled rank and gotten through - though he is 5,000 miles away. Lucky for him he wasn't there, too, since everybody dies.

    Years later, he's up to the same thing, expecting it to work this time (he's actually on site). The daughter of the chief who died in the previous experiment hopes to find proof of what happened, and learns it's about to happen again, only worse.

    It's not a bad movie, though overlong. I thought on its apparent budget it did make good use of special effects. Not worth seeking out, though, unless you're a particular fan of any of the lead actors.
    8kamil-8

    Excellent performance from Amanda

    I basically watched this movie for Amanda Tapping. I'm a huge fan of her. And I wasn't disappointed. I agree with some of the other comments that the storyline was disappointing, but what Amanda did with her character was quite amazing especially considering what she's been given. While her character in some ways reminded me of her Stargate SG-1 character, she gave her a completely different behaviour and much more softness - surpassed Adrian Paul and Malcolm MacDowell by far. If you're a fan of her, rent/buy it now. At least that's my suggestion.

    Mehr wie diese

    The Void
    5,9
    The Void
    Hükümsüz
    6,9
    Hükümsüz
    The Void
    4,0
    The Void
    The Devil's Tattoo
    4,4
    The Devil's Tattoo
    Flug 507 - Gefangen im Zeitloch
    4,4
    Flug 507 - Gefangen im Zeitloch
    Alien Express
    2,6
    Alien Express
    Ba'al - Das Vermächtnis des Sturmgottes
    3,7
    Ba'al - Das Vermächtnis des Sturmgottes
    Stuck
    7,4
    Stuck
    World of Tomorrow - Die Vernichtung hat begonnen
    2,1
    World of Tomorrow - Die Vernichtung hat begonnen
    Asteroid-a-Geddon
    2,5
    Asteroid-a-Geddon
    Meteor Moon
    2,4
    Meteor Moon
    Geo-Disaster
    2,9
    Geo-Disaster

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Patzer
      Eva Soderstrom mentions the Tunguska event in Siberia to Steven Price. She states it happened in 1907, when in fact it actually occurred 30 June 1908. She refers to Tunguska as a place, while Tunguska actually refers to the Stony Tunguska River. The nearest actual place to the Tunguska event site, per Google Maps, is Vanavara, Russia, about 40 miles south of the location of the Tunguska event site.
    • Zitate

      [first lines]

      Automated Voice: Video conference linkup with Washington coming in.

      Tech #1: Dr. Abernathy, how are you today?

      Dr. Thomas Abernathy: I am well, Eva. I trust we're ready to go?

      Tech #1: We are, sir.

      Dr. Thomas Abernathy: Good. I'm anxious to proceed.

      Tech #1: Initiate beam dump. Fill the anti-proton storage ring.

    • Verbindungen
      Referenced in The Black Hole (2006)
    • Soundtracks
      Is Nothing Sacred?
      Written by Mark LeVang (as Mark Le Vang) & Rick Cowling

      Published by Mom's Fudge / BMI

      Performed by Rachel Marotta

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 28. November 2003 (Argentinien)
    • Herkunftsländer
      • Vereinigte Staaten
      • Kanada
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • The Void - Experiment außer Kontrolle
    • Drehorte
      • British Columbia, Kanada
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • Lions Gate Entertainment
      • The Void Productions
      • Crescent Entertainment
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      1 Stunde 33 Minuten
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.78 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • IMDb-Antworten: Helfen Sie, Lücken in unseren Daten zu füllen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.