[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Signs - Zeichen

Originaltitel: Signs
  • 2002
  • 12
  • 1 Std. 46 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,8/10
404.077
IHRE BEWERTUNG
BELIEBTHEIT
1.009
454
Mel Gibson, Joaquin Phoenix, Rory Culkin, and Abigail Breslin in Signs - Zeichen (2002)
CT #2, post
trailer wiedergeben1:35
4 Videos
99+ Fotos
Alien-InvasionDramaMysteryScience-FictionThriller

Eine Familie, die auf einem Bauernhof lebt, findet auf ihren Feldern mysteriöse Kornkreise, was auf etwas Furchterregenderes hindeutet.Eine Familie, die auf einem Bauernhof lebt, findet auf ihren Feldern mysteriöse Kornkreise, was auf etwas Furchterregenderes hindeutet.Eine Familie, die auf einem Bauernhof lebt, findet auf ihren Feldern mysteriöse Kornkreise, was auf etwas Furchterregenderes hindeutet.

  • Regie
    • M. Night Shyamalan
  • Drehbuch
    • M. Night Shyamalan
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Mel Gibson
    • Joaquin Phoenix
    • Rory Culkin
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    6,8/10
    404.077
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    BELIEBTHEIT
    1.009
    454
    • Regie
      • M. Night Shyamalan
    • Drehbuch
      • M. Night Shyamalan
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Mel Gibson
      • Joaquin Phoenix
      • Rory Culkin
    • 2.5KBenutzerrezensionen
    • 202Kritische Rezensionen
    • 59Metascore
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 3 Gewinne & 34 Nominierungen insgesamt

    Videos4

    Signs
    Trailer 1:35
    Signs
    Why M. Night Shyamalan Put on His "Boogie Shoes" for 'Knock at the Cabin'
    Clip 4:02
    Why M. Night Shyamalan Put on His "Boogie Shoes" for 'Knock at the Cabin'
    Why M. Night Shyamalan Put on His "Boogie Shoes" for 'Knock at the Cabin'
    Clip 4:02
    Why M. Night Shyamalan Put on His "Boogie Shoes" for 'Knock at the Cabin'
    'Knock at the Cabin' Cast: Extended Interviews
    Interview 15:42
    'Knock at the Cabin' Cast: Extended Interviews
    What Roles Has Joaquin Phoenix Turned Down?
    Video 3:02
    What Roles Has Joaquin Phoenix Turned Down?

    Fotos110

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 104
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung29

    Ändern
    Mel Gibson
    Mel Gibson
    • Graham Hess
    Joaquin Phoenix
    Joaquin Phoenix
    • Merrill Hess
    Rory Culkin
    Rory Culkin
    • Morgan Hess
    Abigail Breslin
    Abigail Breslin
    • Bo Hess
    Cherry Jones
    Cherry Jones
    • Officer Paski
    M. Night Shyamalan
    M. Night Shyamalan
    • Ray Reddy
    Patricia Kalember
    Patricia Kalember
    • Colleen Hess
    Ted Sutton
    Ted Sutton
    • SFC Cunningham
    Merritt Wever
    Merritt Wever
    • Tracey Abernathy
    Lanny Flaherty
    Lanny Flaherty
    • Mr. Nathan
    Marion McCorry
    • Mrs. Nathan
    Michael Showalter
    Michael Showalter
    • Lionel Prichard
    Kevin Pires
    • Brazilian Birthday Boy
    Clifford David
    Clifford David
    • Columbia University Professor
    Rhonda Overby
    • Sarah Hughes
    Greg Wood
    • TV Anchor
    Paul L. Nolan
    • Mexico City Reporter
    • (Synchronisation)
    • (as Paul Nolan)
    Ukee Washington
    Ukee Washington
    • Off-Screen TV Anchor
    • (Synchronisation)
    • Regie
      • M. Night Shyamalan
    • Drehbuch
      • M. Night Shyamalan
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen2.5K

    6,8404K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    bctitan04

    Fantastic Movie

    This is definitely one of the best movies that I have seen in years. The dialogue is smart, the camera work is perfect and the information and background setting are divulged to the audience at precisely the right pace and exactly the right moment. Mel Gibson turns in his best performance that I can remember and so does Pheonix, who is extremely funny and plays a very real and well defined character. The movie is coincidently the scariest movie that I can remember seeing in theatres, and the scary moments are guaranteed to haunt you for a few days afterwards at least, but the movie is so much better than that and its so much more than a movie about aliens. As everyone knows from reviews, "Signs" means more than just crop signs, but "signs" are never portrayed in a cheesy way, but in a realistic and honest sense, and capturing such a deep topic without going overboard or making a mockery of it seems very hard these days, so that makes the film all the more impressive. Basically, its just awesome, it really is. Go see it.
    8lavaside-60237

    Honestly Shocked

    I'm honestly shocked this has a 6.8 on IMDb.

    A bunch of people used to a 'twist'?

    A bunch of people who think all alien movies must contain explosions?

    A combination of both?

    Great casting.

    Great acting.

    Great writing.

    Lots of tension.

    One of the most serious explorations of faith in cinema.

    Just an all around really good movie.

    Joaquin Phoenix steals the show.

    I will say, it does have a very morose vibe - being the back drop is everyone being sad because the mom had died. I wonder if that is what turned people off. The subject of aliens plays second fiddle to it.

    Yeah, if I had to put my finger on it, I'd bet that's it.
    7hitchcockthelegend

    Now then, swing away Merill, again.

    Signs is written and directed by M. Night Shyamalan. It stars Mel Gibson, Joaquin Phoenix, Rory Culkin, Abigail Breslin and Cherry Jones. Music is scored by James Newton Howard and cinematography by Tak Fujimoto.

    Still reeling from the death of his wife, former man of the cloth Graham Hess (Gibson) lives and works on his farm with his two young children and younger brother. When the family awakes one morning to find a huge crop circle in their plantation, it is asked if it's a prank or the sign of alien contact?

    I don't know if M. Night Shyamalan discouraged the marketing of Signs? Where evidence very much pointed to it being an alien invasion movie for all the family to enjoy? But Signs is anything but a family alien invasion movie. The trailers were deliberately vague, there was a mystery element hanging over the picture and with the Shyamalan CV already boasting the phenomenally successful The Sixth Sense and the divisive, but very moody, Unbreakable, hopes were pitched somewhere between excited and intrigued. Gibson on board, and Phoenix as well, good selling points without a doubt. However, Signs is a grower, a film that pays better dividends on further viewings once armed with the knowledge of what sort of theme drives it on. Yet it still frustrates greatly and you can see why it proved so divisive.

    Shyamalan's movie is primarily about faith, the loss of such, the alien visitors are merely a component of this theme, they act as the catalyst that takes Graham to the pinnacle of his voyage of discovery. The meditations on faith and grief are subtle initially but they drive the picture forward, but then Manoj Shyamalan slips into sermonising and his picture strives for a huge ending to justify it, which unfortunately never arrives, this after having been tickled and baited by the mystery of what the aliens want, friend or foe? Questions leap out such as will the Hess family come through this latest crisis in one piece? And will this "invasion" marry up with the director's thematics that he is so keen for us to open our hearts to? The answers to these questions are mixed, and take further viewings to digest fully. That is if you can forgive the downright idiocy of the alien visitors in the first place?

    The last third has killed the film for many, which is a shame given the excellence on offer in the first hour. Shyamalan's camera is wonderfully fluid, his mise en scène is ace and he garners wonderfully low-key performances from his cast. While as much as his critics hate to acknowledge it, the director has a brilliant knack for building suspense, the ability to draw the viewer into his world, playing on our basic inquisitive nature. That he hasn't delivered on his promise, both here with the finale to the film and later in his overall directing career (though this writer personally loves The Village), is hard to argue against, but there is major talent there buried in his egocentric/confused make up. Elsewhere, James Newton Howard's score is channelling Herrmann and Fujimoto's photography is sublime, this really is a beautiful movie to look at.

    Definitely not a family film, and not really an alien invasion film, with it showcasing both the good and bad aspects of its director. Yet still compelling and pretty enough to warrant a second viewing me thinks. 7/10
    9j0hn22

    Probably, one of the best alien movies

    The plot of the movie was very interesting and so mysterious. The storyline was very well written, totally different than any other alien movies. The filming location of the movie was basic, just an old farmhouse, but I really liked it! The characters were very interesting, so likeable and well-developed. The casting was really good and the acting was nice. The opening scene of the movie was kinda intense and totally unexpected. Overall, it was an unexpected movie that didn't had many plot twists nor jumpscares. But, it was very intense and so creepy (especially, the scenes that the aliens were shown in the screen). Alien's design was just fine, not very realistic but they were terrifying. In my opinion, it's probably one of the best alien movies I have ever seen! It was so good and I would definitely, recommend it to anyone. Last but not least, the ending scene was totally unexpected and kinda shocking.
    xfile731

    Visually terrific

    M. Night Shyamalan has done it again, and this time, better. If 'Unbreakable' left skepticism about the young director, `Signs' will make you a believer again.

    Mel Gibson and his family, one boy, one girl, and Gibson's younger brother (Joaquin Phoenix) take residence in the small town of Bucks County, Pennsylvania. Gibson's wife is not a member of this household (we find out why, later). Shot over and around a 'Walton's-style' house and surrounded by crops, we get the eerie feeling that we are to be entangled here for the next two hours. Immediately, the children notice gigantic perfect circular shapes or signs as we like to call them, appearing within the crops. Is this a hoax or War of the Worlds? And, that's all you need to know. The rest of film will dazzle you with style, suspense, and downright scariness.

    The key ingredients to this recipe for storytelling is one half Close Encounters of the Third Kind, a dash of Stephen King, sprinkled with Orson Wells. Shyamalan also uses Hitchcock like close ups, wicked camera angles, and a blasting score. You are locked in as soon as the movie begins. You will tilt your head in wonder and confusion, as characters in the film do. There is a deep desire to figure this all out, while your stuck in the middle of nowhere, nowhere being Bucks County.

    The picture gives us two ultimate dilemmas to wrestle with. Two basic questions we must ask ourselves. Are our daily occurrences and the paths we choose Coincidence? Or, are is it just plain Luck? Shyamalan weaves these posing questions into a subplot, with trickery until the end. From scene to scene, he leaves no fades to black. As one scene ends the other smartly begins. That's what keeps the audience watching as if we were tucked tightly into our beds and rapidly turning pages of a good book. Each page is significant. This movie isn't just about crops. That's what makes Shyamalan such a keen filmmaker. He has the talent and ability to fog up the film, and distract you with different propositions.

    Shyamalan uses technique to peak his story, rather than dialogue. His masterful and favorite formula is the usage of flashbacks, which gives the audience a chance to catch up on what they might have missed. He emphasizes his points by re-occurring scenes and replaying them for the grand effect, the 11th hour, until he hits you with the finale. Whether you believe the outcome or not, you cannot deny his aptitude for storytelling.

    This nervous and paranoid feature film with a heart-pounding ending is terrific. I was still thinking about it when I left the theater. You too, will enjoy the ride. But, when it's over, say your prayers, get into bed, pull the sheets over your head, breathe a sigh of relief, and close the book!

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      Joaquin Phoenix replaced Mark Ruffalo, who had to pull out of the film due to a brain tumor. It was later found to be benign.
    • Patzer
      They nail boards on the outside of inward-opening doors. Obviously this isn't going to prevent the doors from being opened, but anything is better than nothing and they're panicking anyway. Moreover, when Merrill asks Graham how they will know if boarding the windows will work, Graham replies, "Because they seem to have trouble with pantry doors". Graham is implying that if the aliens have trouble with pantry doors, boarding them can only help. Doing so also may give everyone, especially the children, a sense of hope and/or security.
    • Zitate

      Graham Hess: People break down into two groups. When they experience something lucky, group number one sees it as more than luck, more than coincidence. They see it as a sign, evidence, that there is someone up there, watching out for them. Group number two sees it as just pure luck. Just a happy turn of chance. I'm sure the people in group number two are looking at those fourteen lights in a very suspicious way. For them, the situation is a fifty-fifty. Could be bad, could be good. But deep down, they feel that whatever happens, they're on their own. And that fills them with fear. Yeah, there are those people. But there's a whole lot of people in group number one. When they see those fourteen lights, they're looking at a miracle. And deep down, they feel that whatever's going to happen, there will be someone there to help them. And that fills them with hope. See what you have to ask yourself is what kind of person are you? Are you the kind that sees signs, that sees miracles? Or do you believe that people just get lucky? Or, look at the question this way: Is it possible that there are no coincidences?

    • Crazy Credits
      The end credits are black text that rolls over a black screen with a illuminated blue circle in the middle, instead of the traditional white text on a flat black background.
    • Alternative Versionen
      There is actually an alternative version of this movie, which had different noises for the aliens, prior to release. The noises did not make into the final product. The aliens sounded more demonic than the mostly (although equally scary) alien noises they ended up having. It alone could have gotten the movie an R on the basis of "terror" alone. It was mostly edited out to keep the movie from being too dark, although some of the things about the aliens were demonic, and kept in the movie. "Signs" got away with a lot for a PG-13 movie. To find them, via the comments, go to the Youtube video to the "Signs" trailer, courtesy of user Rob Jackson (the Rotten Videos group's copy of the video; just type "Signs 2002 trailer Rotten Videos," and look for Rob Jackson's comments, they have the links to some of the clips from that version; courtesy of user Kaylin Starlight).
    • Verbindungen
      Edited into Signs: Deleted Scenes (2003)

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ26

    • How long is Signs?Powered by Alexa
    • When the Aliens communicate, why do they sound like squirrels?
    • What is "Signs" about?
    • Is "Signs" based on a book?

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 12. September 2002 (Deutschland)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Offizieller Standort
      • Official site
    • Sprachen
      • Englisch
      • Portugiesisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Señales
    • Drehorte
      • Bucks County, Pennsylvania, USA
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • Touchstone Pictures
      • Blinding Edge Pictures
      • The Kennedy/Marshall Company
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Budget
      • 72.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
    • Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
      • 227.966.634 $
    • Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
      • 60.117.080 $
      • 4. Aug. 2002
    • Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
      • 408.247.917 $
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 46 Min.(106 min)
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Dolby Digital EX
      • SDDS
      • DTS
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.85 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.