IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,4/10
409
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe lives of a sedate suburban family turn rather gruesome with the arrival of a house-guest who is not what he seems to be.The lives of a sedate suburban family turn rather gruesome with the arrival of a house-guest who is not what he seems to be.The lives of a sedate suburban family turn rather gruesome with the arrival of a house-guest who is not what he seems to be.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Rebecca Goldsmith
- Shirley
- (Synchronisation)
- (as Rebecca Southam)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I would have given this movie a 7, but for the last minute. For 90 minutes it is an average good thriller with good acting and moments of suspense. Good to watch. The last minute spoils the thought of this movie for me. Now it is barely a 6.
I live near a second-hand shop where you can always find heaps of DVDs for prices between 1 and 2 EUR. Ideal for rediscovering long-forgotten direct-to-video films from the late 1990s and early 2000s.
So I bought No One Can Hear You, a thriller from 2001. Only 10 reviews, the last one over 10 years ago and barely 4.3/10 on IMDB for the moment. A bad movie?
Not at all! I found this early 2000s film really exciting. Well, the story was clearly not very original and the budget was not very big.
The film was sold at the time as Horror of the Slasher type and that will be part of the explanation for the low score: if you are looking for a really dirty, bloody, groomy film, it is better to choose another film. But for those looking for a thrilling Who Done It with a serial killer, you'll get a lot. The acting is good for this type of film, the filmography is solid and the story builds tension well!
Highly recommended for thriller fans to pick up from the second-hand racks!
So I bought No One Can Hear You, a thriller from 2001. Only 10 reviews, the last one over 10 years ago and barely 4.3/10 on IMDB for the moment. A bad movie?
Not at all! I found this early 2000s film really exciting. Well, the story was clearly not very original and the budget was not very big.
The film was sold at the time as Horror of the Slasher type and that will be part of the explanation for the low score: if you are looking for a really dirty, bloody, groomy film, it is better to choose another film. But for those looking for a thrilling Who Done It with a serial killer, you'll get a lot. The acting is good for this type of film, the filmography is solid and the story builds tension well!
Highly recommended for thriller fans to pick up from the second-hand racks!
First one family is murdered than another and both have a teen beauty queen in each family. Sheriff Barry Corbin is looking towards the young male population of his town as potential killers. However radio news reporter Kelly McGillis has her own ideas. She recalls a very similar slasher case in a neighboring town several years ago and tries to interest Corbin. Of course he's rather obtuse. Guess who's right on the subject.
She's got reason for concern as her daughter Kate Elliott was good friends with the other two murdered girls. We're given an interesting trio of suspects. Backpacker Kieran Hutchison, the James Dean wannabe Daniel Gillies, and somewhat nerdy kid Tom Huntington. There's also a really dumb deputy in the mix in Craig Parker.
I never as a rule expect much from these films and I'm not disappointed. The cast goes through the motions and collects their paychecks.
Hey Elliott could have wound up married to the wrong one.
She's got reason for concern as her daughter Kate Elliott was good friends with the other two murdered girls. We're given an interesting trio of suspects. Backpacker Kieran Hutchison, the James Dean wannabe Daniel Gillies, and somewhat nerdy kid Tom Huntington. There's also a really dumb deputy in the mix in Craig Parker.
I never as a rule expect much from these films and I'm not disappointed. The cast goes through the motions and collects their paychecks.
Hey Elliott could have wound up married to the wrong one.
Why would anyone waste perfectly good film for something this bad is beyond me. The only reason I watched this movie through is that I was unable to leave my bed at the time. The acting's horrible, but that's not the problem. The music's lousy, but that is also not the problem. The problem is this: there isn't one original scene, one original idea, one comprehensible line of dialogue or one believable character in the whole messy 90 minutes of it. To quote my beloved "Singin' in the rain" - DID SOMEBODY ACTUALLY GET PAID FOR WRITING THIS? The movie is an incomprehensible mess, a hastily stuck together bunch of clichés. Don't bother. In fact, discourage others from watching. You'll be doing them a favour.
The acting of the the two female victims and the main lead are excruciatingly bad, Are they even American?! Mixed in with some blatant overacting and a bland script this movie is a real turkey. Avoid.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesEmily Barclay's debut.
- PatzerAfter Ben is dead, it is suddenly morning again, when a few moments before that is was still pitch black outside.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 32 Min.(92 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen