Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA highly decorated Navy Seal is forced out of retirement in order to save his son's life and bring justice to the man who destroyed his career.A highly decorated Navy Seal is forced out of retirement in order to save his son's life and bring justice to the man who destroyed his career.A highly decorated Navy Seal is forced out of retirement in order to save his son's life and bring justice to the man who destroyed his career.
Edward Albert
- Senator Richards
- (as Edward Albert Jr.)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This was nothing like Last Line of Defence (part 1).
I was really disappointed.
I love Olivier Gruner usually! Please try harder.
I shall watch his next film with interest.
I was really disappointed.
I love Olivier Gruner usually! Please try harder.
I shall watch his next film with interest.
Kelly Kennedy is an amazing talent!!!! No need for a pace or plot here, this spectacular piece of feces rocks my world.....
I was very curious about EXTREME HONOR because of the cast, the genre, the fact that is available on YouTube and also because since it has 3,4 I wanted to give it a chance because, maybe it couldn't have been that bad. Boy, I was wrong. Please read the following text.
John Kennedy Brascoe (Dan Andersen) is a marine that at the beginning is seen killing another man in self-defense during a robbery and soon he is thrown out from the Marines because in the accident the son of the robber died. Soon John goes to Samuel Baker (Michael Ironside) for discussing the situation since his son is ill and Samuel says that he can't do anything and that another marine had to enter the unit. John then manages to do a robbery in Baker's mansion with the help of Frank Sparks (Michael Madsen) that go in his caveau and rob anything they can. After lots of nonsense John will find the responsible of the framing and his son, but who cares?
The problems: 1) none of the characters (except probably Madsen's) was relatable or close to be a human being as they all acted like caricatures: Baker was a jerk that even forced two gold diggers to pose like he wanted, Brascoe looked like a huge doofus (and that's why Dan Andersen never made movies after this one) and the rest are quite forgettable. The acting is on par with the qualities of the characters.
2) Some of the actions didn't make a lot of sense, and the editing was all over the place. For istance, when Sparks and his men go for the robbery and (after not showing how they blindfolded Baker) John puts a CD of classical music, and when the heist is over they open a bottle of champagne despite we haven't seen that coming and there was not that much time for taking the bottle safely to the caveaux. After a while a sniper tries to murder Brascoe while he is jogging and even tho the bullet could have hit him istantly, the bullet hits a biker that was a few steps near him. For the sake of the plot of for making the movie even longer? We don't know. And some of the scenes where the bad guys get shot are dizzy. Now I don't know if it's the print that I found on YouTube or the movie itself but I didn't saw Brascoe shooting Baker in the head, but the car door opening and Baker falling to the ground. And especially towards the end there was the VHS marking time, just proof that whoever uploaded it was bored to death too.
3) The entire thing is boring and a chore to sit through, and believe me, after it was over I felt the urge of going to bed. And although it's labeled as an action movie, there isn't even that much action.
After all I said, it's clear I won't recommend EXTREME HONOR to anybody, not even bad movie fans because it's THAT boring and sloppy and might induce some head-ache. Good concept... but bad execution. The recipe for disaster.
John Kennedy Brascoe (Dan Andersen) is a marine that at the beginning is seen killing another man in self-defense during a robbery and soon he is thrown out from the Marines because in the accident the son of the robber died. Soon John goes to Samuel Baker (Michael Ironside) for discussing the situation since his son is ill and Samuel says that he can't do anything and that another marine had to enter the unit. John then manages to do a robbery in Baker's mansion with the help of Frank Sparks (Michael Madsen) that go in his caveau and rob anything they can. After lots of nonsense John will find the responsible of the framing and his son, but who cares?
The problems: 1) none of the characters (except probably Madsen's) was relatable or close to be a human being as they all acted like caricatures: Baker was a jerk that even forced two gold diggers to pose like he wanted, Brascoe looked like a huge doofus (and that's why Dan Andersen never made movies after this one) and the rest are quite forgettable. The acting is on par with the qualities of the characters.
2) Some of the actions didn't make a lot of sense, and the editing was all over the place. For istance, when Sparks and his men go for the robbery and (after not showing how they blindfolded Baker) John puts a CD of classical music, and when the heist is over they open a bottle of champagne despite we haven't seen that coming and there was not that much time for taking the bottle safely to the caveaux. After a while a sniper tries to murder Brascoe while he is jogging and even tho the bullet could have hit him istantly, the bullet hits a biker that was a few steps near him. For the sake of the plot of for making the movie even longer? We don't know. And some of the scenes where the bad guys get shot are dizzy. Now I don't know if it's the print that I found on YouTube or the movie itself but I didn't saw Brascoe shooting Baker in the head, but the car door opening and Baker falling to the ground. And especially towards the end there was the VHS marking time, just proof that whoever uploaded it was bored to death too.
3) The entire thing is boring and a chore to sit through, and believe me, after it was over I felt the urge of going to bed. And although it's labeled as an action movie, there isn't even that much action.
After all I said, it's clear I won't recommend EXTREME HONOR to anybody, not even bad movie fans because it's THAT boring and sloppy and might induce some head-ache. Good concept... but bad execution. The recipe for disaster.
"Extreme Honor" has one thing going for it: A hilarious title! As an added bonus, a character uses it in a sentence! "You have a lot of honor, You have extreme honor." If you are renting it for the usual mugging by Michael Ironside, Oliver Gruner and Michael Madsen, you'll be disappointed. They don't have a lot of screen time.
The gunfight at the end is so fake, it's funny. Instead of bullets flying through the air like a John Woo movie, it just shows a flash of the gun and a sound effect. If you love that idea, let me introduce you to "Red Serpent"....
For more insanity, check out: comeuppancereviews.com
The gunfight at the end is so fake, it's funny. Instead of bullets flying through the air like a John Woo movie, it just shows a flash of the gun and a sound effect. If you love that idea, let me introduce you to "Red Serpent"....
For more insanity, check out: comeuppancereviews.com
Well, I already knew about the shameless advertising this movie is guilty of before going into it. The names of Michael Ironside, Michael Madsen and Oliver Gruner are displayed in big letters on the front-cover of the DVD, yet they only have supporting rolls in this flick. The leading character, John Kennedy Brascoe, a (soon to be former) Navy S.E.A.L. lieutenant, is portrayed by Dan Andersen. Now where the hell did they find this guy and who is he? Apparently he did this one and only movie in 2001 and then completely disappeared from the face of the earth. Because I am so intrigued by this, I guess I'm going to do a little internet research on this man. It's already very obvious that the film-makers were trying to introduce him as the next big action star, but sadly that plan failed miserably. Now I must say that he at least tried to put down a performance of some sort, but as an actor, his skills are extremely limited. And on top of that it seems that he somewhat feels uncomfortable in front of a camera. Other than that, no offense please, the guy's pretty ugly-looking too. But I won't hold that against him, 'cause he can't help that little fact. So, nice try Mr. Andersen and I'm sorry this whole movie-thing didn't seem to have worked out very well for you.
So what about the movie? Well, as an action-flick, this one fails big time. And that's not even because it's poorly executed or something. In the 5-minute-long opening scene, this movie promises to be an action-packed (because of several guns at display) B-movie with an international software-smuggling plot. But after that, to my utmost surprise, this turns into a soap-opera family drama and all this lasts for the next 40(!)minutes or so. Fortunately, during all this, Michael Ironside, Oliver Gruner and Charles Napier have already graced the screen with their limited screen-time. Charles Napier actually only has a little cameo, as he is in only one scene. But it was fun seeing this big-mouthed cult-icon again. Michael Ironside is once again very enjoyable as the filthy rich (and illustriously corrupt) Mr. Baker. And Oliver Gruner? Well, everyone knows the man isn't a great acting talent. But I always have so much fun when I see him delivering his lines with that almost incomprehensible accent of his. He even has trouble saying "I'm taking you out, a$$h@Le!", so you can imaging what fun it is seeing him trying to pronounce "dishonourable discharge". After those 40 minutes, Michael Madsen enters the ring, and well, he's just cool as ice, as always.
Probably the only sequence worth watching is the organized robbery of Mr. Parker's mansion. Another funny line comes from Michael Ironside: "Who in this little soap-opera of yours, would be best served by you dying?". Now, was writer/director Steven Rush trying to be witty here? By applying some self-mockery here and referring to the fact that this whole movie actually is more like a soap-opera than an action-movie anyway. Or maybe Michael Ironside came up with that line himself, after having read the script? I sure would love to give him some credit for that. And even more funny was the fact that Mr. Parker had to give no less than 3 hints to John Brascoe before he could guess who placed the hit-contract on his head. I mean, how dumb is this ex-Navy S.E.A.L character? And there are even some more enjoyable but extremely uninspired and predictable twists in the plot. And of course the obligatory love-interest (including love-scene) for Johnny Brascoe.
Now, I can somehow imagine that on paper this screenplay perhaps didn't even look that bad. It's just sad that this movie neither works as an action movie or a drama (with the latter aspect being portrait in a just too cheap type of fashion). And strangely I didn't even mind wasting 90 minutes of a lazy Sunday afternoon on EXTREME HONOR. Must have been because of Ironside, Madsen and Gruner's funny accent. So there you have the 3 solid points this movie deserves.
So what about the movie? Well, as an action-flick, this one fails big time. And that's not even because it's poorly executed or something. In the 5-minute-long opening scene, this movie promises to be an action-packed (because of several guns at display) B-movie with an international software-smuggling plot. But after that, to my utmost surprise, this turns into a soap-opera family drama and all this lasts for the next 40(!)minutes or so. Fortunately, during all this, Michael Ironside, Oliver Gruner and Charles Napier have already graced the screen with their limited screen-time. Charles Napier actually only has a little cameo, as he is in only one scene. But it was fun seeing this big-mouthed cult-icon again. Michael Ironside is once again very enjoyable as the filthy rich (and illustriously corrupt) Mr. Baker. And Oliver Gruner? Well, everyone knows the man isn't a great acting talent. But I always have so much fun when I see him delivering his lines with that almost incomprehensible accent of his. He even has trouble saying "I'm taking you out, a$$h@Le!", so you can imaging what fun it is seeing him trying to pronounce "dishonourable discharge". After those 40 minutes, Michael Madsen enters the ring, and well, he's just cool as ice, as always.
Probably the only sequence worth watching is the organized robbery of Mr. Parker's mansion. Another funny line comes from Michael Ironside: "Who in this little soap-opera of yours, would be best served by you dying?". Now, was writer/director Steven Rush trying to be witty here? By applying some self-mockery here and referring to the fact that this whole movie actually is more like a soap-opera than an action-movie anyway. Or maybe Michael Ironside came up with that line himself, after having read the script? I sure would love to give him some credit for that. And even more funny was the fact that Mr. Parker had to give no less than 3 hints to John Brascoe before he could guess who placed the hit-contract on his head. I mean, how dumb is this ex-Navy S.E.A.L character? And there are even some more enjoyable but extremely uninspired and predictable twists in the plot. And of course the obligatory love-interest (including love-scene) for Johnny Brascoe.
Now, I can somehow imagine that on paper this screenplay perhaps didn't even look that bad. It's just sad that this movie neither works as an action movie or a drama (with the latter aspect being portrait in a just too cheap type of fashion). And strangely I didn't even mind wasting 90 minutes of a lazy Sunday afternoon on EXTREME HONOR. Must have been because of Ironside, Madsen and Gruner's funny accent. So there you have the 3 solid points this movie deserves.
Wusstest du schon
- SoundtracksAfraid To Love
Written by Joe Lervold & J.Elle
Performed by The Joel Evans Quartet
Courtesy of Cinemasters
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 30 Min.(90 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen