Claire Kubik, eine hochkarätige Anwältin, findet ihre Welt auf den Kopf gestellt, als ihr Ehemann, der unter falschem Namen gelebt hat, von der Militärpolizei festgenommen und wegen Mordes a... Alles lesenClaire Kubik, eine hochkarätige Anwältin, findet ihre Welt auf den Kopf gestellt, als ihr Ehemann, der unter falschem Namen gelebt hat, von der Militärpolizei festgenommen und wegen Mordes an Dorfbewohnern vor Gericht gestellt wird, während er bei den Marines war.Claire Kubik, eine hochkarätige Anwältin, findet ihre Welt auf den Kopf gestellt, als ihr Ehemann, der unter falschem Namen gelebt hat, von der Militärpolizei festgenommen und wegen Mordes an Dorfbewohnern vor Gericht gestellt wird, während er bei den Marines war.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
That question keeps the viewer guessing for much of the film and provides some very good suspense. It's another film, however, in which there is a strong anti-U.S. military flavor, so typical in films since the 1960s.
Also, once you know the ending, I doubt if this would be a movie you would watch more than once. However, it's definitely worth a look and will entertain you for about two hours. Ashley Judd, Jim Caviezel and Morgan Freeman are three attractive lead actors, all interesting to watch, as usual.
A woman must uncover national security secrets to clear her husband,accused of war crimes in El Salvador.
Best Performance: Morgan Freeman Worst Performance: Jim Caviezel
Like Kiss the Girls, this movie is full of mystery and tension that will captivate an audience and keep the movie's pace going strong despite its simple and predictable plot. Freeman is a calm yet dynamic actor, which is perfect in his role as he teams up once again with Judd, who herself gave an energetic and dramatic performance in her attorney role. Jim Caviezel gave a strong and mysterious performance as the accused Tom, whose unknown background will leave the audience guessing.
With some good suspense and tension, it's a worthy courtroom drama for a popcorn movie night.
Grade B-
The acting is surprisedly well, especially by Caviezel. I didn't understand why he had that "outburst" at the end, but that's a minor detail. Judd is equally good as Claire, except she seemed to be too slow at some parts. So did the pacing. It seemed to drag on a little, and the genre seemed to be more like a courtroom drama instead of a crime thriller.
Morgan Freeman is OK as the lawyer Claire hires. His acting seemed a little forced at times, though. The plot, though nothing new, was one of those that were predictable, but I was enjoying it too much to care. It's very entertaining if you just sit back and watch it instead of scrutinizing every little detail of it.
But, at the end, after the final court scene, it seems to continue on for a little long after spending an hour and a half leading up to that part. The running time was a little long. And the ever-lovable Amanda Peet plays a role where she could have gotten more time and shown off her acting ability. If you sit back for two hours and leave your mind on hold, it's a very entertaining yarn.
My rating: 7/10
Rated PG-13 violence and some language.
Let's just ignore the fact that this film is a cliché, and sit back and enjoy it. It has enough actors that we love that there is something you will enjoy.
Besides Judd and Freeman, it has Jesus (James Caviezel) as the husband who is hiding his past, Amanda Peet (The Whole Nine Yards) as the slutty sister, and it is directed by Carl Franklin (Out of Time, Devil with the Blue Dress).
Anyone who has watched more than a dozen movies can easily predict what comes next as the film unfolds, maybe even the ending, although that is the most illogical part for me, so it's not going to tax your brain. It's just another good opportunity to see Judd and Freeman. That's enough for me.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesIn early versions of the script, Ashley Judd's character was to be a Harvard law professor.
- PatzerThe presiding Judge threatened to send Charlie Grimes to the brig for improper trial conduct. Mr. Grimes is a civilian and the judge doesn't have the authority to detain him in a military jail.
- Zitate
[Charlie and his dog Delilah's answering machine]
Charlie Grimes: This is C.W. Grimes and associates. If you wanna talk to Charlie you should leave a message after the beep. I you wanna talk to Delilah, you should get your head examined!
- VerbindungenFeatured in High Crimes: A Military Mystery (2002)
Top-Auswahl
- How long is High Crimes?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- High Crimes - Auf höchsten Befehl
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 42.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 41.543.917 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 14.005.550 $
- 7. Apr. 2002
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 63.781.810 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 55 Min.(115 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1