The Secret Life: Jeffrey Dahmer

The Secret Life of Jeffrey Dahmer is a necessary movie. Carl Crew's acting is excellent, especially under the circumstances of a film made from documentary information, about this dull boy, who really has no life at all (within himself, at least). Carl gives the whole as extremely factual, near to the bone but not over-gory, and with emotion too. Although Jeff was known for not being the coolest of guys, and Carl portrayed Jeff in this film to be a teeny bit hip in parts - this was really pretty irrelevant. What was relevant was the facts of Jeff's life, purely! His childhood included, the whole of his years of killing, and the abandonment Jeff felt so often..unbias, nothing blamed. And if anyone was to think that Carl Crew may have 'strange notions' to do the film, he has just gone one step further than those who have written the Dahmer (et al) books, who have gone just one step further than all of the millions of people in the world who study criminology, psychology law etc etc etc. Excellent Film.

The Secret Life: Jeffrey Dahmer is slightly interesting, but it goes around in circles too much. It never really taps into his mind, or shows why he is, what he is. It just shows Dahmer luring countless victims, and that's it. The special they did on Dahmer on the show Mugshots, was much more informational and interesting. Overall, slightly interesting, but the special they did on the show Mugshots, is far better. ** (out of four)

Please allow me to, first, address comments stating how this movie was "accurate" and true to the "facts" of the case. Absolutely 💯 incorrect.

Not even close.

It jumped straight in, by him bringing the hitchhiker home and killing him while mom was sewing...???...in the house...???...as they were bench pressing ... outside the house ....?

No focus on the broken home life and absent parents that had Jeff home alone drunk all the time, nor the stalking he did of a jogger before the hitchhiker appeared, no mention of roadkill collecting he did, or his mom's addiction issues.

Then jumps straight to a hotel room - no mention of the drugging the drinks, no mention of bath houses banning him first from similar behavior.

Then, straight to Grandma with smells without explanation.

The lead actor was absolutely the OPPOSITE of Jeffrey's personality and appearance.

There was no facts at all. It was as if the writer had seen the news clips and faded in and out of consciousness while picking out parts that stuck with him and then guessing at what strung the scenes together.

The kid that was "drugged" and asking for help? Never happened. 3 women found the 14 year old child completely zombied out with a hole in his head from Jeffrey and the police believed Jeffrey when he said his "boyfriend" was just drunk and would take care of him and released him to Jeffrey - which ended his life.

There was no mention of his odd job situations, or other tenants in his apartment building.

This could not have been further from the "facts" If it was the National Enquirer, The Sun, or TMZ writing this "story".

Now, all of that being said, if you love rifftrax, (mst3k), you may dig this in the same way.... get some friends together and riff the movie together because it IS a GOLDMINE of sloppy storytelling, awful acting, and hilarious scene cuts. 😆

If you suspend reality and pretend it's not a movie about Jeffrey Dahmer (won't be hard since it's obviously not), and watch it the way you watch "cute little buggars" or "velocipastor", and have some beer, and maybe some weed and laugh, you will enjoy this film, and all it's awfulness. I do.

But no... don't listen to the reviews stating this is facts, because it couldn't be further from the facts. And low budget doesn't explain the awful writing and acting. But it's GREAT for laughs!

I bought this used and only payed $1.99 for it. That said, it's worth that kind of money. It's pretty decent for an extreme-low-budget film, but it could have been much better. To me, Carl Crew wasn't believable as Jeffrey Dahmer. He wasn't the right physical type, nor did he speak with Dahmer's distinctive nasal accent. And frankly, the constant "I should have stayed with God" diatribe becomes annoying after a while.

For a more realistic and subdued look at Dahmer's life, see the new film "Dahmer" with Jeremy Renner. Renner's performance as Jeffrey is so dead-on, it's scary. And while it doesn't get into as many of Jeffrey's killings, everyone should already know the basic story by now.

Bottom Line: If you can see this movie cheap, it's worth a look. But the 2002 movie is far superior, in my opinion.

This is a tough film to review, since several factors need to be taken into account. Let's filter the more judgmental..Ok, are you interested in the facts concerning the serial killer of Jeffrey Dahmer? Can you withstand an independent, low-budget film? Are you objective enough to NOT dislike a film solely due to its lack of stars or professional look? Well, if you said yes then you should have a mind open enough to handle this one. This film is an almost 100% accurate dramatization of Dahmer's adult life and subsequent murder spree, and is styled as an autobiography. It isn't a glamorized, unrealistic account that unfortunately the theatrical film "Dahmer" (2001) was. The movie begins with Dahmer, played quite convincingly by Carl Crew, sitting in the police car as they raid his apartment. His thoughts of what got him there are presented to us in a past-tense, narrated style that accurately explains much of Dahmer's psychoses and motives which led him to commit murder almost 20 times. We get to know the character, both the devious side as well as the side that came moderately close to living a normal life. It isn't anyone's fault but Dahmer's that 17 people died, but being a criminal psychology student, I was pleased to more than just his animalistic side represented, truthfully, in this film. You see him having a loving relationship with his grandmother as well as trying to find companionship, but of course we witness the side of him that everyone remembers. It should be noted that there is little actual onscreen violence, with much of it suggestive in shots such as spattering of blood or a body being struck through a blurred curtain. You do see two deaths that I remember, one being a pretty bloodless throat slash and the other being a man shoved alive into a barrel of acid. While you don't see anything graphic, this cruelty and the convincing acting of both Crew and his victim make this a disturbing scene. And while the actual onscreen mutilation is kept low, you will see the results. There is a prop hand and head or two, but it seems as if this was to disturb the viewer and doesn't look to be exploitive. Besides, these fake anatomical pieces are where the budget limitations are visible. Although acceptable, they look enough like fakes to not be too disturbing. The film actually concludes before Dahmer's death in 1994, due to the fact that it was released a year or two prior. That's about the only big difference from the real story, and the information that remains is, as I've stated, very true to the facts. The film quality could be better, the dialogue often sounds a little too quiet, and the acting of several characters IS a bit hammy, but it's not overboard. In my opinion, this is a flawed but ultimately honest and serious look into one of America's most remembered serial killers. I think it's safe to say the film is memorable as well, and I respect it for overcoming its limitations to deliver the story in a believable manner, aided by a thoroughly excellent Carl Crew as Dahmer.