Martine bietet Terry einen Vorsprung vor einem narrensicheren Bankhit in der Londoner Baker Street. Sie zielt auf einen Raum voller Schließfächer im Wert von Millionen von Bargeld und Schmuc... Alles lesenMartine bietet Terry einen Vorsprung vor einem narrensicheren Bankhit in der Londoner Baker Street. Sie zielt auf einen Raum voller Schließfächer im Wert von Millionen von Bargeld und Schmuck. Aber Terry und seine Crew wissen nicht, dass die Kisten auch eine Fundgrube schmutziger... Alles lesenMartine bietet Terry einen Vorsprung vor einem narrensicheren Bankhit in der Londoner Baker Street. Sie zielt auf einen Raum voller Schließfächer im Wert von Millionen von Bargeld und Schmuck. Aber Terry und seine Crew wissen nicht, dass die Kisten auch eine Fundgrube schmutziger Geheimnisse enthalten - Geheimnisse, die sie in ein tödliches Netz aus Korruption und ill... Alles lesen
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 3 Nominierungen insgesamt
- Lord Drysdale
- (as Rupert Fraser)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Its an enjoyable film, good story, production wise nothing special; could be a made for TV movie, there wasn't much action surprisingly and the jokes were thin on the ground; a snatch copy it 'aint.
Good performance from Jason Stratham in his best screwed up, looking menacing while surprised face. Good supporting cast with many faces you will recognise (spot the Eastender) apart from a terrible performance from Stephen Campbell Moore who looked like he was on a comedy show. Thought it could have maybe done with a bit more music from the 70's, Just to cement home the era a bit more.
I wouldn't bother spending money going to see this at the cinema, unless maybe its Orange Wednesday 2-4-1, more suited to a DVD viewing or wait till it hits Film Four in a year or two.
Enjoyable, better than average British film, but no Oscars coming its way.
The only complaints I have of the film are that the characters do get a little cheeky from time to time (but hey, they're British, so it's kind of expected), and there's a couple flashbacks/lapses in time that are initially confusing - although everything is clearly laid out about halfway through. Want to see a good movie? Check this one out!
The movie keeps a good pace and never takes itself too seriously. It builds up the plot lines and tries somewhat successfully to tie everything together. There is some good tension, a bit of violence (not much), and eventually, vindication for most of the parties.
The problems with the movie are numerous, but nothing that ultimately destroys the fun. Yes the movie is rife with inexplicably, unnecessary side characters (see female undercover agent in the Caribbean). Yes the movie's dialogue veers into indecipherable 1970s British slang, which gives a comedic undertone to conversations that are intended to be serious. Yes there exist rampant plot issues that make you wonder how stupid cops really are. And yes the acting is OK, at best, lets face it Jason Stracham is meant for British caper movies the way Keanu Reeves is meant to play a clueless surfer cop in Point Break - so while he's not winning any Academies, he fits these rolls just fine.
You could wait for the DVD, or if you are looking for a fun way to kill 2 hours, you should go to the theater for this one.
Unlike most films, this one requires a couple of advance tips: First, watch it with the improbable idea in mind that most of it is actual, hard-to-believe truth; second, don't be impatient. As the story of a 1971 bank robbery begins, the setting in London, the parade of seemingly unconnected stories and characters is rather confusing, complex, disjointed. But stay with it - there is a crescendo of excitement and excellence.
The true elements of "The Bank Job," some hidden until recently by Britain's "D Notice" censorship law (modified in 1993, becoming DA, or Defense Advisory) are these:
1. A big bank robbery did take place on Baker Street in 1971, culprits never found, money never recovered. After initial big headlines, the story disappeared from the newspapers.
2. There was serious police corruption in London in the 1970s, cops on payrolls of drug dealers and pornographers.
3. Princess Margaret was involved in a series of affairs, some caught on compromising photos which were not published by the otherwise relentlessly sensational British press, under the D-Notice rule.
4. There was a militant British black-power advocate, called Michael X, involved in a one-man, multi-country crime wave. (In 1971, John Lennon paid for Michael X's bail, something not mentioned in the film.)
"The Bank Job" director Roger Donaldson (of "No Way Out") brings together all these true threads in a way that may be true even in its totality, director and cast prevailing over some shoddy work from too many writers.
The content is all true, the context is excitingly possible. Did the government, in trying to prevent exposure of Princess Margaret by evidence in Michael X's possession, mastermind the bank robbery? Was MI-5 or MI-6 (says a policeman in the film: "I never remember which is which") involved, and actually assisting the robbers? Again, possibly.
The cast is remarkable: Jason Statham is the ringleader, the bad guy of "Transporter" and "The Italian Job" turning into a scourge of the really bad guys. Saffron Burrows, James Spader's vamp nemesis on "Boston Legal," brings her remarkable name and looks to the criminally and emotionally ambiguous major female role.
Peter De Jersey is a totally scary Michael X; David ("Poirot") Suchet is a frightening crime lord; and a whole host of top British stage actors fill in big roles and small ones. Don't be misled by reviews speaking of a so-so thriller - "The Bank Job" is a great deal more than that, even to the point that you may want to see it more than once.
Nothing loud and boisterous. No over-stylized cinematography, pointless set-pieces, cheesy dialogue, or over-flowing emotions.
A perfect example of why the finest movie-making talent in Hollywood is British. And possibly the best caper movie of recent times.
Had this been from Hollywood, every fine detail of the complex subtext in the story would have been blown apart. Instead, everything is under-played, the characters are superbly realistic and believable, and the script sharp as a pin. And the cast is a brilliant ensemble.
Worth many repeated viewings for the subtle humour and to get the most out of the twisting plot developements.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesWhen Eddie says, "Money may be your god, but it ain't mine," this is almost exactly what the real life lookout for the bank robbers said over his walkie-talkie during the robbery. This is known because, as in the movie, a ham radio operator tape recorded some of the conversations broadcast by the robbers.
- PatzerAlthough the film is set in 1971, signs on various shop doors seen in the film advertise that credit cards "Visa" and "Mastercard" are accepted. The name "Visa" was not used for the charge card before 1977 (replacing Barclaycard in the UK); "Mastercard" was "Master Charge" until 1979.
- Zitate
Sonia Bern: [to police officer] The whole point of having a safe deposit box is so that people like you don't know what's in it!
- Crazy CreditsDisclaimer: "The names of many people identified in this film have been changed to protect the guilty."
- SoundtracksGet It On
Written by Marc Bolan
Performed by T. Rex
Westminster Music Ltd
Administered by Essex Music of Australia Pty Ltd
Licensed courtesy of Straight Ahead Productions
Top-Auswahl
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- El robo del siglo
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 20.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 30.060.660 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 5.935.256 $
- 9. März 2008
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 64.828.421 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 51 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1