Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA novelist blackmails his now married ex-girlfriend into having an affair with him.A novelist blackmails his now married ex-girlfriend into having an affair with him.A novelist blackmails his now married ex-girlfriend into having an affair with him.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Rudolph Valentino
- Jose Dalmarez
- (as Rudolf Valentine)
Arthur Earle
- Carlos - the Butler
- (as Arthur Earl)
Aileen Pringle
- Inez Salles
- (as Aileen Savage)
Alex Shannon
- Campos Salles - Her Father
- (as Alex K. Shannon)
Jean Gauthier DeTrigny
- Alvarez - His Son
- (as Gene Gauthier)
Peggy Bolton
- Vera's Child
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Restored at UCLA, "Stolen Moments" is an 85-year-old film featuring Rudolph Valentino in one of the villainous roles he played before stardom hit. Here, he has a mustache and looks a bit fuller in the face as he plays a smooth, oily, amoral writer who wants to trade sex for some passionate letters he received from a now married woman (Marguerite Namara).
Not much of this movie remains. When Valentino became a star, the film was recut to enhance his role, as it originally was a showcase for Namara, an opera singer. All that remained after that was the re-cut version, and it has not survived in its entirety. What does remain is in remarkable shape.
Valentino is very good, and although some of the old silent film acting like the widening of the eyes is disconcerting, it's certainly forgivable. We're fortunate to be able to see him this early in his career. I will reiterate something I said about other films of this era: I don't know how much Lasik surgery one has to have before being able to read all the notes that were received by characters in these silent films. It's obvious that '20s eyes were a lot sharper.
Not much of this movie remains. When Valentino became a star, the film was recut to enhance his role, as it originally was a showcase for Namara, an opera singer. All that remained after that was the re-cut version, and it has not survived in its entirety. What does remain is in remarkable shape.
Valentino is very good, and although some of the old silent film acting like the widening of the eyes is disconcerting, it's certainly forgivable. We're fortunate to be able to see him this early in his career. I will reiterate something I said about other films of this era: I don't know how much Lasik surgery one has to have before being able to read all the notes that were received by characters in these silent films. It's obvious that '20s eyes were a lot sharper.
This was Valentino's last film before he appeared in Rex Ingram's THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE, the film that made him a star -- so great a star that the original six reels of this movie were cut down to three and edited to make his role more important.
It's a fairly old-fashioned movie for 1920: a still camera, mostly one- and two-shots and the frame is frequently irised in to provide a specific composition, a technique that Hollywood had largely abandoned by this time, preferring to let the objects and people provide their own compositions. The story is also old-fashioned and the entire thing was done to showcase the female lead, Margeurite Namara. Who was she? Someone who was a show-biz celebrity at the time. Really, the only talent connected with this picture whose name has survived well is Valentino and perhaps Gene Gauthier.
Although his next picture would make him a star, Valentino is clearly a very talented motion picture actor by this time. He understands how to pace his movements and how to indicate his character -- and even his nationality -- by how he moves. Here he is clearly European. In the previous year's DELICIOUS LITTLE DEVIL, no one could have acted more American. Here was a man who earned his stardom. Take a look at this and other performances and see it.
It's a fairly old-fashioned movie for 1920: a still camera, mostly one- and two-shots and the frame is frequently irised in to provide a specific composition, a technique that Hollywood had largely abandoned by this time, preferring to let the objects and people provide their own compositions. The story is also old-fashioned and the entire thing was done to showcase the female lead, Margeurite Namara. Who was she? Someone who was a show-biz celebrity at the time. Really, the only talent connected with this picture whose name has survived well is Valentino and perhaps Gene Gauthier.
Although his next picture would make him a star, Valentino is clearly a very talented motion picture actor by this time. He understands how to pace his movements and how to indicate his character -- and even his nationality -- by how he moves. Here he is clearly European. In the previous year's DELICIOUS LITTLE DEVIL, no one could have acted more American. Here was a man who earned his stardom. Take a look at this and other performances and see it.
Stolen Moments (1920)
** (out of 4)
A rather dull and lifeless silent melodrama about a woman (Marguerite Namara) torn between a Latin playboy (Rudolph Valentino) and a hardworking man (Albert L. Barrett). This was originally produced to show off Namara and was released as a six-reeler but after Valentino became a star the studio went back and cut most of the story out making this a three-reeler that showed off the famous star more. With that in mind, it's really no shock that the film makes very little sense and this is certainly true during the final act, which involves a murder and an investigation. The six-reel version is now lost so this "Valentino version" is all that's left. Once again, I can't say I was too impressed with the silent icon but I do plan on getting to some of his more famous roles. Namara isn't any better in the lead but Barrett comes across with a good performance and is the main reason to see this.
** (out of 4)
A rather dull and lifeless silent melodrama about a woman (Marguerite Namara) torn between a Latin playboy (Rudolph Valentino) and a hardworking man (Albert L. Barrett). This was originally produced to show off Namara and was released as a six-reeler but after Valentino became a star the studio went back and cut most of the story out making this a three-reeler that showed off the famous star more. With that in mind, it's really no shock that the film makes very little sense and this is certainly true during the final act, which involves a murder and an investigation. The six-reel version is now lost so this "Valentino version" is all that's left. Once again, I can't say I was too impressed with the silent icon but I do plan on getting to some of his more famous roles. Namara isn't any better in the lead but Barrett comes across with a good performance and is the main reason to see this.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe film was originally a vehicle for Marguerite Namara. After Rudolph Valentino achieved stardom it was cut by approximately half its original running time with the new edit favoring Valentino. Only the edited version is known to exist. The film had its American television debut on Turner Classic Movies on May 22, 2006.
- Crazy CreditsSince the only surviving footage of this film is 3 reels long out of an original 6-reel movie, the listing of the cast credits and the crew credits are taken from the AFI Catalogue. The print itself follows the cast listing closely, with only the butler Arthur Earle not identified in the intertitles. There are no crew credits listed in the surviving print.
- Alternative VersionenIn 2006, Flicker Valley copyrighted a 35-minute version with a piano score by Jon Mirsalis. This was a restored version of the 3-reel edited version released to theaters in November 1922 to capitalize on the soaring popularity of 'Rudolph Valentino'. The original 6-reel version appears to be lost.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.33 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Stolen Moments (1920) officially released in Canada in English?
Antwort