[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Without Evidence

  • 1995
  • 16
  • 1 Std. 39 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,9/10
1296
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Without Evidence (1995)
VerschwörungsthrillerDramaKriminalitätMysteriumThriller

Die Geschichte dreht sich um eine mögliche Verschwörung hinter dem realen Mord an Michael Francke, dem Gefängnisdirektor von Oregon.Die Geschichte dreht sich um eine mögliche Verschwörung hinter dem realen Mord an Michael Francke, dem Gefängnisdirektor von Oregon.Die Geschichte dreht sich um eine mögliche Verschwörung hinter dem realen Mord an Michael Francke, dem Gefängnisdirektor von Oregon.

  • Regie
    • Gill Dennis
  • Drehbuch
    • Phil Stanford
    • Gill Dennis
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Scott Plank
    • Anna Gunn
    • Andrew Prine
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    3,9/10
    1296
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Gill Dennis
    • Drehbuch
      • Phil Stanford
      • Gill Dennis
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Scott Plank
      • Anna Gunn
      • Andrew Prine
    • 16Benutzerrezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Fotos28

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 22
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung54

    Ändern
    Scott Plank
    Scott Plank
    • Kevin Francke
    Anna Gunn
    Anna Gunn
    • Liz Godlove
    Andrew Prine
    Andrew Prine
    • John Nelson
    Angelina Jolie
    Angelina Jolie
    • Jodie Swearingen
    Paul Perri
    Paul Perri
    • Sgt. Unsoeld
    Kristen Peckinpah
    • Katie Francke
    Allen Nause
    • Dale Penn
    • (as Alan Nause)
    Chris Mastrandrea
    • Anthony
    Danny Bruno
    Danny Bruno
    • Field Sergeant
    Ernie Garrett
    • Michael Francke
    Eric Hull
    • David
    Ed Collier
    • Fisk
    Geof Prysirr
    • Pat Francke
    Michael Russo
    • Konrad Garcia
    Jason Tomlins
    • Frank Gable
    W. Earl Brown
    W. Earl Brown
    • Grace
    Chris Nelson Norris
    • Hunsaker
    • (as C. Nelson Norris)
    Ellen Wheeler
    • Bingta Francke
    • Regie
      • Gill Dennis
    • Drehbuch
      • Phil Stanford
      • Gill Dennis
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen16

    3,91.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    4DEPRESSEDcherry

    Conviction without evidence

    Written in part by a journalist who has dedicated much of his career to this true story, it unsurprisingly doesn't deviate from the perspective that the conspiracy the movie presents is true. It may well be the case that the version of events on offer here is the truth, unfortunately, that doesn't guarantee a well-told story. The quality is a little rough around the edges. For a movie so focused on a real-life story, it's really lacking in telling that story. Everything just tends to drift by from scene to scene with very little fleshed out. It gives the impression that the makers were overly cautious, and as such used as little creative license as possible. This movie presents its story at the expense of entertaining you. The main cast do put in a good shift and work well with what they're given. Don't be fooled by the cover as Angelina Jolie isn't in the movie for long, but she does steal the show when she appears. The ending might well be as far as the story goes at the time of filming, but it won't leave any satisfaction.
    1alltakes

    Simple sell. Advertised with Jolie. Crappy movie.

    This movie rides on Angelina Jolie's name (and that's in retrospect looking at it from now)--she's not even a primary character here. She's a passing character here. This is (albeit announced as so) a story based on a real event, that basically follows the storyline to a: "Is that it???" You might as well watch an episode of America's Unsolved Mysteries (or whatever it was called). This takes you through a true occurrence that was never solved. BUT...it leaves you at the same place.... STILL UNSOLVED!!! What's worse is that it doesn't really leave you with anything to "chew" on (i.e., something to talk about at work or with friends/family to talk about). It just...ends. It doesn't even leave you with captions for "if you have seen call..." This movie is essentially HALF a movie that leaves you at the, "What's gonna happen now???" point. And there is no, "What's gonna happen now," the credits start rolling...
    1goertzen-3

    A great movie for insomniacs!

    I love movies- I'd watch a movie every day if I had time. There are very few movies I don't watch to the bitter end- even if it's obvious they're duds. But this dud takes the cake. I was watching it with my little brother and after he had drifted off to sleep for the third time I figured this was enough. (Unfortunately I stayed awake the whole time!) So I quit watching. Out of curiosity I checked how much time was left in the movie. Eight minutes. I could not have cared less how it ended. Boring. Boring. Boring. Lots of footage of the "hero" driving a car. Unexplained plot gaps. Very poor level acting. I think it was re-released now because Angela Jolie was in it and she's hot in Hollywood right now. (The movie came out in 1995.) We got it from the new release section in the movie store, and what a rip-off. -This is easily the most boring movie I've ever seen
    redhottcrystal

    Is it over yet?

    This movie said it was based on a true story so I thought it might be interesting. From the start the movie was disappointing.Little information is built upon the characters leaving you not knowing enough about any of them for them to be very likable. Just when the movie seems to be going in the right direction it falls short. Situations develop but with little detail. There seemed to be too much information trying to be crammed into the movie.It was like one scene he asked for the autopsy report and ,cut, next scene he gets the report in the mail.Toward the end of the movie I just kept wondering when is the movie going to be over. Then the ending is there and you don't even know it because the whole movie just drags on. It ends so abruptly that you still have questions, but really you could care less if they are answered.A total waste of time and money.
    1shood9

    where did the ending go.....

    This had jolie on the front cover (it appears as if she is the main character) so I thought great this should be good. What a joke she is in about 3 scenes. The movie was appalling. It had no plot, just seemed to move from scene to scene with parts missing, and to top it all of did not seem to end. I know not all movies have to have endings but this just seemed to cut off before you find out if he uncovers the cover up and who are the people he should be so scared of. For a true life story it should not be hard to have an ending as it already exists. I think they just got bored filming it, I know I did watching it. If I was Jolie I would sue for associating her name in such a big way. As you may have guessed from this rant this is a crap movie and to avoided at all costs, unless you need help sleeping.

    Mehr wie diese

    Love Is All There Is
    5,0
    Love Is All There Is
    Playing God
    5,6
    Playing God
    Hell's Kitchen - Vorhof zur Hölle
    4,6
    Hell's Kitchen - Vorhof zur Hölle
    Nichts als Trouble mit den Frauen
    5,2
    Nichts als Trouble mit den Frauen
    Foxfire
    6,1
    Foxfire
    True Women
    6,6
    True Women
    Hackers - Im Netz des FBI
    6,2
    Hackers - Im Netz des FBI
    Ein mutiger Weg
    6,6
    Ein mutiger Weg
    Cyborg 2
    3,9
    Cyborg 2
    Alice & Viril
    4,9
    Alice & Viril
    Nur noch 60 Sekunden
    6,5
    Nur noch 60 Sekunden
    Der Zocker
    5,1
    Der Zocker

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      In conjunction with the home video release in the U.S., a $1 million reward was offered for information leading to the conviction and sentencing of the murderer(s) of Michael Francke, the crime on which the movie is based.
    • Crazy Credits
      At the ending of the movie credits the following notice appears: A reward of up to one million dollars ($1.000.000) is herby offered for voluntary testimony leading to the apprehension, arrest, conviction and sentencing of the persons responsible for the murder of Michael Francke on January 17 or 18, 1989. Such reward will be paid by MFD, Ltd. on sentencing of the criminal or criminals. All claims for reward must be made to MFD, Ltd. within 10 days of the apprehension of the person specified in the notice of reward. MFD, Ltd. shall be the sole judge of any dispute arising over the reward. In addition. MFD, Ltd. shall be the sole judge of person or persons entitled to share in the reward. The decision of MFD, Ltd. on any point connected with the reward shall be conclusive and final.

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ

    • How long is Without Evidence?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 21. Oktober 2011 (Deutschland)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Evidence
    • Drehorte
      • Florida, USA
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      1 Stunde 39 Minuten
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Ultra Stereo

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.