[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
IMDbPro

Four Dogs Playing Poker

  • 2000
  • 16
  • 1 Std. 37 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,5/10
1482
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Four Dogs Playing Poker (2000)
Home Video Trailer from MDP Worldwide
trailer wiedergeben0:42
1 Video
10 Fotos
DramaKriminalitätMysteryThriller

Vier Freunde stehlen eine wertvolle Statuette für einen gefährlichen Kunsthändler auf dem Schwarzmarkt, verlieren sie und sind gezwungen, ein tödliches Bluffspiel zu spielen, um ihr Leben zu... Alles lesenVier Freunde stehlen eine wertvolle Statuette für einen gefährlichen Kunsthändler auf dem Schwarzmarkt, verlieren sie und sind gezwungen, ein tödliches Bluffspiel zu spielen, um ihr Leben zu retten.Vier Freunde stehlen eine wertvolle Statuette für einen gefährlichen Kunsthändler auf dem Schwarzmarkt, verlieren sie und sind gezwungen, ein tödliches Bluffspiel zu spielen, um ihr Leben zu retten.

  • Regie
    • Paul Rachman
  • Drehbuch
    • Shawn David Thompson
    • William Quist
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Olivia Williams
    • Balthazar Getty
    • Arly Jover
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    5,5/10
    1482
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Paul Rachman
    • Drehbuch
      • Shawn David Thompson
      • William Quist
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Olivia Williams
      • Balthazar Getty
      • Arly Jover
    • 29Benutzerrezensionen
    • 6Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 1 wins total

    Videos1

    Four Dogs Playing Poker
    Trailer 0:42
    Four Dogs Playing Poker

    Fotos9

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung26

    Ändern
    Olivia Williams
    Olivia Williams
    • Audrey
    Balthazar Getty
    Balthazar Getty
    • Julian
    Arly Jover
    Arly Jover
    • Maria
    Jason Cairns
    • Oscar
    Ruben Moreno
    • Priest
    Daniel London
    Daniel London
    • Kevin
    Stacy Edwards
    Stacy Edwards
    • Holly
    Steve Jones
    Steve Jones
    • Tom
    • (as Stephen Phillip Jones)
    George Lazenby
    George Lazenby
    • Carlo
    John Taylor
    John Taylor
    • Dick
    • (as John Nigel Taylor)
    Tim Curry
    Tim Curry
    • Felix
    Octavia Spencer
    Octavia Spencer
    • Waitress
    • (as Octavia L. Spencer)
    Ray Berrios
    • House Security Guard
    Peter Vasquez
    Peter Vasquez
    • Data Security Guard
    • (as Peter Mark Vasquez)
    Ramiro Fabian
    • Supervisor
    Jorge Luis Abreu
    • Porter
    Forest Whitaker
    Forest Whitaker
    • Mr. Ellington
    Inday Ba
    Inday Ba
    • Punk Chick
    • Regie
      • Paul Rachman
    • Drehbuch
      • Shawn David Thompson
      • William Quist
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen29

    5,51.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    HellBoy13

    Good idea. NOT the worst movie in the world. Worth a watch.

    What's the concept behind the painting "Four Dogs Playing Poker"? Poker is a game of luck, but winning involves bluffing, lying, and aggressiveness. Dogs think they can handle these human traits, but they're just dogs. Predictable. Emotional. Easy tells.

    This movie is about four childhood friends who are all in danger of dying.

    To save themselves, they concoct a scheme to sacrifice one of them for the sake of the others. But they want to keep things anonymous to alleviate guilt, and that's where they stop trusting each other. Like four dogs playing poker, trying to figure out the other dogs' motives, not knowing who to trust...

    The details sometimes fall by the wayside in order to set up this very interesting idea, but I found the story itself to be gripping. I had to watch the whole thing to see what happened.

    Can you trust YOUR childhood friends if all your lives were on the line?
    ntsci

    betrayal and intrigue

    Previous comments seem to be either one of extreme hate or pleasure. I find the extremes fascinating. I think this movie was average. Not great, but worthwhile watching. One that you need to watch twice to get the point. I found no part of it boring. The use of poker in the title has to do with the bluffing, faking, lying and not showing all of ones cards.

    On the whole it is much better in terms of the story than most action films.

    If plots making sense was a requirement for a good movie, then I guess there are very very few movies worth watching. The plot for example of Master and Commander, a movie I really enjoyed, was based on an absurd disregard for the navel power situation in 1805 wherein Britian had obtained complete mastery over the oceans (e.g., Battle of the Nile, 1803). So why should we attack Four Dogs for a gimmicky premise. Name a movie that doesn't involve some gimmick or suspension of disbelief to get the ball rolling.

    To me the only unexplained part is why the bad guy wants a million from them, but that might also be part of the double crossing.

    In Four Dogs, the fact that so called friends agree so easily to kill one another was one of the points -- their friendship wasn't worth a half million. It must also be kept in mind that they were being manipulating into agreeing with the idea and it was done so subtly that it is not until you see the movie for the second time that you can see the manipulations that are going one. There's actually a lot of subtly in the movie. But also notice how several members of the group were all prepared to double cross the rest. The main double crosser however did give at least one of them a chance.

    It is very doubtful that the insurance scam idea would work, but the main characters didn't clue into the main problem with it -- back dating the payments on the policies -- thats a whole lotta fraud. But its a mute point, there is never any mention at the end of the film about cashing the policies in! Suggesting that the whole insurance scam was part of the doublecrossing plots and a bluff. It isn't important how fast the money will be paid out, whats important is that they players in this high stakes game, think that cashing in the policy on one of them, will save the rest.

    The fact that the ships crew had a Mexican accent (I'm assuming that the Argentinian commentator meant accent, not language, cause the language is the same), isn't that surprising since the ship has an English name and is headed toward Los Angeles (home of a very large Mexican population) -- so its more likely to have a Mexican speaking crew than an Argentinian crew.

    The whys or practicalities of the movies aren't really the main issues. The most interesting part of the movie is the crisis, the cut throat solution they come up with, how they are manipulated into the solution, and how the solution unravels (as planned).

    There a very interesting thing going on when one of the characters asks another if he could really kill her.
    35capade

    No ace, more a joker.

    A stylish thriller, with one major let-down: the whole premise is just so unbelievable that you really need to be able to suspend your disbelief for this one.

    Four young art thieves, and their mentor (a surprisingly good, but underused Tim Curry), steal a priceless statue from an Argentinian millionaire, (a surprisingly good, but underused ex-James Bond, George Lazenby!) and ship it back to the States on a cargo ship. Recipient of the said statue hears that it isn't on the ship, and promises to kill all five if it isn't delivered - or make them pay $1 million. So, what would you do? Wait and see if it turns up, do a runner and leave the country? Or build up some elaborate insurance scam whereby one of you has to kill another one, so the rest of the gang can claim $1 million insurance? They opt for the latter, and all reality goes out of the window. It's a shame, because the four 'friends' are good together, and there are some genuine thrilling moments. Its pretensions to film noir are justified an only a few occasions, and the 'twist' ending doesn't really make up for the plotholes.

    That said, certainly worth a look.
    SCHAGELA

    Not like Shallow Grave or Usual Suspects at all!

    I gave this one a shot, lured by the text on the cover that this flick would be like mix of the two very good above mentioned films. Not at all in my opinion. I think the plot is very cheaply worked out. The '4 dogs' could have found their way out of the situation more easily than making up this stupid idea about life insurances. I found the acting very poorly too, except maybe for Tim Curry.

    All in all not worth the time or money.
    5Blockmary

    Good premise, poorly done

    **SPIOLERS WITHIN**

    Four Dogs Playing Poker had a very good premise. Unfortunately, the plot gaps kill the movie. The following are issues I had with the movie:

    1. In a game of life or death, they let one person go into the bank to place the life insurance policies in the safe deposit boxes. Ultimately, this leads to the demise of the other characters. Are you kidding me?? Gee, you think she might cheat the other people and save her own life?? Surely not. Lets trust her to go in alone.

    2. There is no way they could have collected on life insurance policies that quickly, especially in a situation as suspicious as it would have been.

    3. Incriminating messages are left on various answering machines. These people are apparently not too bright.

    I will stop at this point, although I could go on forever. The acting was mediocre AT BEST. A couple of scenes were really corny, including the leaping between buildings and the woman falling off the ladder. If you are looking for a movie that is realistic, this is absolutely not it.

    5 out of 10.

    Mehr wie diese

    Die Legende vom einsamen Ranger
    5,0
    Die Legende vom einsamen Ranger
    Adam Ruins Everything
    8,1
    Adam Ruins Everything
    The Ghost Ship
    6,6
    The Ghost Ship
    Nutation
    Nutation
    Xanadu
    5,4
    Xanadu
    60 Minutes
    7,4
    60 Minutes
    Frequencies
    6,7
    Frequencies
    Born Romantic
    6,4
    Born Romantic
    Pakt der Rache
    6,1
    Pakt der Rache
    Dead Babies
    4,6
    Dead Babies
    Brillanten für die Diktatur des Proletariats
    6,2
    Brillanten für die Diktatur des Proletariats
    Tanz in den Wolken
    6,5
    Tanz in den Wolken

    Verwandte Interessen

    Mahershala Ali and Alex R. Hibbert in Moonlight (2016)
    Drama
    James Gandolfini, Edie Falco, Sharon Angela, Max Casella, Dan Grimaldi, Joe Perrino, Donna Pescow, Jamie-Lynn Sigler, Tony Sirico, and Michael Drayer in Die Sopranos (1999)
    Kriminalität
    Jack Nicholson and Faye Dunaway in Chinatown (1974)
    Mystery
    Cho Yeo-jeong in Parasite (2019)
    Thriller

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Patzer
      Kevin and Holly are listed in the credits twice.
    • Crazy Credits
      Daniel London in the role of Kevin is listed twice in the closing credits.
    • Soundtracks
      Concerto in G Major For Two Mandolins & Strings
      Written by Antonio Vivaldi

      Performed by Eliot Fisk, Guitar

      Orchestra of St. Luke

      Albert Fuller, Harpsichord

      Courtesy of MusicMasters, Inc.

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 7. September 2000 (Deutschland)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Sprachen
      • Englisch
      • Spanisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Einer für alle - Der Tod spielt mit
    • Drehorte
      • Buenos Aires, Bundesdistrikt, Argentinien
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • Half Moon Entertainment
      • New Moon Productions
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 37 Min.(97 min)
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Dolby SR
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.85 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.