Inspektor Wexford ermittelt
Originaltitel: The Ruth Rendell Mysteries
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,8/10
770
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Von kalten, mit Felsen übersäten Mooren bis hin zu komfortablen Vorstadtsiedlungen erforscht die preisgekrönte Schriftstellerin Ruth Rendell die dunklen Risse zwischen Freunden und Familienm... Alles lesenVon kalten, mit Felsen übersäten Mooren bis hin zu komfortablen Vorstadtsiedlungen erforscht die preisgekrönte Schriftstellerin Ruth Rendell die dunklen Risse zwischen Freunden und Familienmitgliedern, die zum Mord motivieren.Von kalten, mit Felsen übersäten Mooren bis hin zu komfortablen Vorstadtsiedlungen erforscht die preisgekrönte Schriftstellerin Ruth Rendell die dunklen Risse zwischen Freunden und Familienmitgliedern, die zum Mord motivieren.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I love a good British mystery, especially of the pre-2000 variety. Hence I was excited when YouTube suggested I watch a few episodes of Ruth Rendell.
But boy, what a disappointment. What could be a reasonably entertaining (and even then, hardly more than that) 30-minute story gets shamelessly dragged out into four (4) episodes of 50 minutes each. Someone's getting married? Great; let's show the church; the guests arriving; the brides sashaying down the isle; the ceremony; the 'Just Married'; the couple driving off on their honeymoon. Etc. Etc. Never mind that it serves no purpose in the story whatsoever.
I can see how a lonely old person in the 1980s, with a total of two programs on their black-and-white telly, might give it a go. But for today's viewer, this show is the definition of boring.
But boy, what a disappointment. What could be a reasonably entertaining (and even then, hardly more than that) 30-minute story gets shamelessly dragged out into four (4) episodes of 50 minutes each. Someone's getting married? Great; let's show the church; the guests arriving; the brides sashaying down the isle; the ceremony; the 'Just Married'; the couple driving off on their honeymoon. Etc. Etc. Never mind that it serves no purpose in the story whatsoever.
I can see how a lonely old person in the 1980s, with a total of two programs on their black-and-white telly, might give it a go. But for today's viewer, this show is the definition of boring.
I saw "Master of the Moor and it was very poorly done many respects except for the acting and I wasted my time viewing it. Fortunately it was the only bad experience I have had with Netflix. I just thought Ruth Rendell was a better writer.
Wow,I am amazed at how bad this series is
I bought a dvd of this and was bored to death
This is supposed to be a murder series,but there is no urgency,no thrill, just old English people plodding along with their customs and traditions
I'm sure George baker is a decent actor, but he's miscast In this role, it would have suited someone tougher and smarter, not this old guy that was regularly seen taking naps and mumbling
The direction is terrible They show entire scenes that have nothing to do with the murder just to drag the time out
There was a long drawn out dinner party scene in which nothing remotely interesting happend, this went on for ages
I haven't never seen this on another TV series,it's shocking and an insult to viewers.
This is supposed to be a murder series,but there is no urgency,no thrill, just old English people plodding along with their customs and traditions
I'm sure George baker is a decent actor, but he's miscast In this role, it would have suited someone tougher and smarter, not this old guy that was regularly seen taking naps and mumbling
The direction is terrible They show entire scenes that have nothing to do with the murder just to drag the time out
There was a long drawn out dinner party scene in which nothing remotely interesting happend, this went on for ages
I haven't never seen this on another TV series,it's shocking and an insult to viewers.
We read the reviews and thought it would be a great series. The first story was carried over 4 episodes. Could have been done in an hour and still not with it! After the first episode, we were stunned and underwhelmed. However, we continued to watch (and FF where possible) to get to the merciful conclusion of the storyline. The worst "police" we've seen in any series. No focus. No passion except when they overacted. We read that Ruth Rendell based Wexford on herself. Passionless (except when overacting), no real ability to reason or solve crimes - so how was she able to write if she's like her character??? We will not waste our time on the remaining 44 episodes.
I can't believe I actually watched 2 episodes. I love Colin Firth, so I thought it might get better. It's not only terrible, it's a travesty. I'm sure Colin in embarrassed by it. I would be. Not only is the directing terrible, so is the acting! How anything so terrible makes it to the final screen. It has to be the worst I've ever seen. And the writing ... no one speaks like that. It makes me angry that something so beautifully visual could be that bad. Such potential. And for what? I'm moving on & will try to forget that I even considered watching the 3rd episode of this disaster. Sorry Colin! I think you're a great actor, but I guess we all have to have our failures. It's how we learn to move on!
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesDavid Jason is a big fan of the show and other detective series, which inspired him to play a detective in A Touch of Frost (1992).
- VerbindungenFeatured in Drama Trails: 'The Fixer' to 'Trial and Retribution' (2008)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How many seasons does Ruth Rendell Mysteries have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Los misterios de Ruth Rendell
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Inspektor Wexford ermittelt (1987) officially released in India in English?
Antwort