Eine hartnäckige Anwältin übernimmt den Fall eines großen Unternehmens, das dafür verantwortlich ist, dass bei mehreren Menschen Leukämie diagnostiziert wurde, weil die Wasserversorgung der ... Alles lesenEine hartnäckige Anwältin übernimmt den Fall eines großen Unternehmens, das dafür verantwortlich ist, dass bei mehreren Menschen Leukämie diagnostiziert wurde, weil die Wasserversorgung der Stadt verseucht war.Eine hartnäckige Anwältin übernimmt den Fall eines großen Unternehmens, das dafür verantwortlich ist, dass bei mehreren Menschen Leukämie diagnostiziert wurde, weil die Wasserversorgung der Stadt verseucht war.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Für 2 Oscars nominiert
- 5 Gewinne & 10 Nominierungen insgesamt
- Mr. Granger
- (as Daniel Von Bargen)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
'A Civil Action' is based on a true story of a court case about environmental pollution that took place in Woburn, Massachusetts in the 1970s.
It was a tragic time, for the people who lost their loved ones. And the cinematic version pays respect to them. The Court Scenes are sharply written and executed, while some scenes, especially towards the end, lose pace.
Steven Zaillian's Adpated Screenplay is mostly intense and gripping. His direction, is neat as well. Cinematography by Conrad L. Hall is picture perfect. Editing is fair.
Performance-Wise: Travolta and Duvall, both own the film. Travolta is flawless as the righteous attorney, while Duvall is powerful and menacing. Among other performances, William H. Macy and James Gandolfini stand on their own with note-worthy performances. John Lithgow is perfect, as ever.
On the whole, A Must See Film!
"Slow-moving" = ...no car chases.
"poor acting" = ...no karate chops
"too long" = ...longer than a music video
"dull" = ...See "Slow-moving"
"A Civil Action" was a fine book, and the film does it justice. No, it's not perfect, but it is emotionally moving, and faithful to the non-fiction account of the case.
Some of the heart-rending short scenes featuring parents of the child-victims (the father at the deposition; the parents trying to revive the dying child in the car) were absolute masterpieces. There should be special Academy Awards available for brief scenes of this kind that are too "small" for Best Supporting Actor awards, but are, in themselves, worthy of acclaim.
The DVD brings out the cinematography which is very, very good and the picture is razor-sharp. One of Hollywood''s Hall Of Fame photographers, Conrad Hall, shot this film. Story-wise, the courtroom scenes were the most dramatic of the film but this story dealt more with the behind-the-scenes digging of information to expose thoughtless businessmen who had dumped poison in an area and people were suffering because of it. It is supposedly-based on a true story.
Another big highlight of this movie is great performance by John Travolta, perhaps his best work ever. Just the pauses and looks on his face alone greatly enhanced his performance. He was just fascinating. Language-wise, this is pretty tame except for William H. Macy, who loses his cool a few times as the assistant lawyer/financial man for the law firm battling the polluters.
It's easy to get involved with the story, but don't overlook the great photography in here.
Robert Duvall is excellent as his opposing counsel, and his character's interplay in the courtroom drama with Travolta is worth seeing the film for alone. Duvall plays quirky characters like few else in modern cinema.
Given the job of prosecuting a tannery over water pollution that has led to the death of many children, this is well written and structured - as well as being brilliantly acted and well directed.
The one complaint I would have is that this petered out a little in the finish, which was perhaps inevitable as it's a true story, and sometimes the climax of real life isn't as good as in fiction.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe real Jerome Facher was thrilled at the way he was portrayed by Robert Duvall.
- PatzerAl Eustis tells Jan he won't pay the amount of money to settle the lawsuit because once the amount is disclosed to the public, they'll file lawsuits as well. With all his years of experience in civil law, Jan should've known this is only an excuse because all contract settlement terms will remain confidential to any outside party, as the judge states at 1 hour and 30 minutes into the movie.
- Zitate
Jan Schlichtmann: [narrating] The odds of a plaintiff's lawyer winning in civil court are two to one against. Think about that for a second. Your odds of surviving a game of Russian roulette are better than winning a case at trial. 12 times better. So why does anyone do it? They don't. They settle. Out of the 780,000, only 12,000 or 11/2 percent ever reach a verdict. The whole idea of lawsuits is to settle, to compel the other side to settle. And you do that by spending more money than you should, which forces them to spend more money than they should, and whoever comes to their senses first loses. Trials are a corruption of the entire process and only fools who have something to prove end up ensnared in them. Now when I say prove, I don't mean about the case, I mean about themselves.
- Crazy CreditsThe producers wish to thank the people of Boston, Waltham, Northbridge, Charlestown, Dedham, Brimfield and Palmer, MA.
- Alternative VersionenIn the North American prints, the 1985 Touchstone Pictures logo played first, followed by the 1995 version of the 1987 Paramount Pictures plays at the beginning. The international prints had the logos alternating with Paramount played first followed by Touchstone. The North American prints ending it with the Buena Vista Pictures Distribution disclaimer, followed by the closing version of the Paramount Pictures and Touchstone Pictures logos. The international prints meanwhile had also removing the Buena Vista references and it goes directly to the closing version of Touchstone Pictures and Paramount Pictures logos.
- SoundtracksHard Workin' Man
Written by Jack Nitzsche, Ry Cooder, Paul Schrader
Performed by Don Van Vliet (as Captain Beefheart)
Courtesy of MCA Records
Under license from Universal Music Special Markets
Top-Auswahl
- How long is A Civil Action?Powered by Alexa
- What did Judge Skinner do that Jan didn't like?
- Why did Facher exhibit odd behaviors?
- What is an 'orphan'?
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 75.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 56.709.981 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 70.079 $
- 27. Dez. 1998
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 56.709.981 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 55 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1