IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,1/10
1834
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuAn amnesiac youth tries to piece together his past, but what he discovers may jeopardize his future.An amnesiac youth tries to piece together his past, but what he discovers may jeopardize his future.An amnesiac youth tries to piece together his past, but what he discovers may jeopardize his future.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Sam Haft
- Samuel Ronson
- (as Samuel Haft)
Mary DeBellis
- Mrs. Ronson
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I took interest in this movie because I had purchased the book before I had even known there was a movie made of it. Movies are always different than the books, so I decided to stick with the book and read it to the end before I should rent the movie version. It took me a little while to get used to Robert Cormier's style of writing but once I got into the book, I couldn't put it down. After I got used to the style of writing, it was all I knew, wanted to know, and wanted to expect. I also couldn't put the book down because of the plot development and the story as a whole. But on a different note, let's forget the story line for a moment - I'd like to say that this book is wonderfully written. It just is. Cormier didn't just come up with a story and pull you through the book just to get to the point of it. The journey itself through each page is awesome. Barney is the most developed character because, even though it is third person, we go through his life along side him, we discover his thoughts and feelings - which I think Cormier did the most excellent job of writing in the book. Barney isn't some cheesy character. He has thoughts , feelings, and insecurities like real human beings have and just the way it is written really connected me to it and prompted introspection. At first I was really dissatisfied with the ending, thinking it was abrupt, but the more I thought about it, the way it ended (where it was at) was a good ending. It led us to assume the future without having Cormier tell us, which makes the book very good - because it makes US think about it days afterwards instead of having Cormier tell us "and that was that...the end."
Now the movie itself was OK. My opinion is most likely different from someone else's who has just seen the movie with no prior reading. The story in the movie is similar, but I don't like the way they went about converting the story into a movie. I knew first off that the movie could never be as good as the book (as most movies are) because it is unable to be as detailed and can't successfully develop Barney's character and definitely could not show us his thoughts. But what bothered me most about the movie was not only was it missing things, but it changed ideas around - almost as if the screenplay writer had confused ideas brought up in the book. There are too many for me to explain, though. Also, they could have cast more appropriate actors. I'll just show a few examples. Barney in the book was brown-eyed, bowlegged and insecure. Cassie was in her twenties, blond and blue eyed and was "out of Barney's league" considering the age difference and the situation of it all. Also, a major point made in the book was the difference between Mazzo and Barney. Mazzo was blond and beautiful. Even though his disease was apparant on his body, it never took away his handsomeness. Barney contemplated that Mazzo's beauty was going to waste, while, he, a not handsome, bowlegged boy was not ill and was going to live. A big change which I didn't like was with "the Handyman". He was a man in the book who is much less open and caring towards Barney which contributed to the atmosphere of the Complex and what Barney is going through. The movie softened it up for viewers having it be a caring women who keeps Barney's well-being in mind. I also think the director could have done better. For example, Billy the Kidney could barely walk when he was out of his wheel chair and everytime Barney talked to him, Billy had this look of pain in his eyes, which he never complained about the disease despite the fact he whined about everything else. In the movie he is different - once again, softened up. Also Allie Roon was very spastic constantly moving and stuttering. Allie in the movie was toned down version.
I can't say who would prefer the book or the movie. I prefer the book because it is much more complete, isn't afraid to tell you every detail or hide the darkness of the Complex. The movie has less of that and gives us a happier ending. Barney is very depleted in his life, but even the book can show you (in a much more complete way) he still strives for hopes and accomplishes dreams, which makes him all the more of a character to root for. But this is just the tip of the iceberg of what I am trying to say.
Read the book and see for yourself.
Now the movie itself was OK. My opinion is most likely different from someone else's who has just seen the movie with no prior reading. The story in the movie is similar, but I don't like the way they went about converting the story into a movie. I knew first off that the movie could never be as good as the book (as most movies are) because it is unable to be as detailed and can't successfully develop Barney's character and definitely could not show us his thoughts. But what bothered me most about the movie was not only was it missing things, but it changed ideas around - almost as if the screenplay writer had confused ideas brought up in the book. There are too many for me to explain, though. Also, they could have cast more appropriate actors. I'll just show a few examples. Barney in the book was brown-eyed, bowlegged and insecure. Cassie was in her twenties, blond and blue eyed and was "out of Barney's league" considering the age difference and the situation of it all. Also, a major point made in the book was the difference between Mazzo and Barney. Mazzo was blond and beautiful. Even though his disease was apparant on his body, it never took away his handsomeness. Barney contemplated that Mazzo's beauty was going to waste, while, he, a not handsome, bowlegged boy was not ill and was going to live. A big change which I didn't like was with "the Handyman". He was a man in the book who is much less open and caring towards Barney which contributed to the atmosphere of the Complex and what Barney is going through. The movie softened it up for viewers having it be a caring women who keeps Barney's well-being in mind. I also think the director could have done better. For example, Billy the Kidney could barely walk when he was out of his wheel chair and everytime Barney talked to him, Billy had this look of pain in his eyes, which he never complained about the disease despite the fact he whined about everything else. In the movie he is different - once again, softened up. Also Allie Roon was very spastic constantly moving and stuttering. Allie in the movie was toned down version.
I can't say who would prefer the book or the movie. I prefer the book because it is much more complete, isn't afraid to tell you every detail or hide the darkness of the Complex. The movie has less of that and gives us a happier ending. Barney is very depleted in his life, but even the book can show you (in a much more complete way) he still strives for hopes and accomplishes dreams, which makes him all the more of a character to root for. But this is just the tip of the iceberg of what I am trying to say.
Read the book and see for yourself.
I found this film tedious and slow. A boy admits himself into a research facility for terminal patients. He isn't terminal, but is part of an experiment to conquer cancer by removing the brain's memory of the disease. He spends most of his time interacting with the other patients and trying to remember his past. This was just another dull and tepid film in a long line of flimsy tear jerkers.
I think some replies here were a little bit harsh on the movie. Mind you, this is a movie critic's haven, so I can understand. But let's try to level here.
First of all, I knew when starting this movie that it was going to be an indie, low-budget, sort of film, so I wasn't expecting some kind of Lord of The Rings or COlor Purple. I also knew not to expect anything too complex--in my experience with movies such as these, there is more there than just a simple, plausible plot that appeals to everybody. I knew going into it: Hey this is an Elijah Wood movie. Now everything I have seen him in, with the exception of Flipper, has been in some way great, and always told a great or complex story. Summing up all of those conclusions, I went into the movie knowing I shouldn't try to apply any other movie criticisms to it until I had seen it all the way through twice in order to fully catch the drift of the movie.
That being said, the movie was fair. I don't think it is the greatest thing he has ever done; it in no way compares to the Ice Storm or Lord of The Rings. However, I think the end of the movie sort of pulls everything together and helps me to see why Elijah might've chosen to do this movie.
Here is what I liked: The ending, the one that leaves everyone questioning a few things; the sarcastic kid, Billy, and his acerbic sence of humor; the thought processes of Barney Snow (Elijah Wood seems to have mastered the subtlety that is required for this role; Most people here complained that Barney was too apathetic for someone who knew nothing about his past or future, but I think it reflects some of Elijah's character in there too. At the end you see Elijah's happiness restored, when he is able to let go of everything (the very last scene), but throughout the movie it is quiet, subtle nuances; the introvert in Elijah shines through, and I think it is fantastic, and almsot mysterious.) I also liked Mazzo, I think he was a great actor in this movie, and the role worked well with him.
Here is what I disliked: The romantic scene with Rachel Leigh Cook when he finds out she is leaving for Europe...I think their chemistry is terrible, and I don't think the actors are to blame--I think the casting directors are to blame. EW and RLC can both be great, Elijah much more so than Rachel Leigh Cook, but I don't think they worked well together at all.
Suprisingly, I think he and Jordana Brewster from the Faculty had a better chemistry. Also, I think there was too little effort put into the love story. It was like...out of nowhere...they were in love...which is okay sometimes, as long as the characters' feelings are out in the open, but their feelings weren't out in the open. It made it seem strange that the cover of the video box was Elijah and RLC hugging; to me that wasn't the greater message of the movie. THe cover should have been Elijah as the central figure, and then, perhaps, the supporting characters behind him, sort of blended into the background.
Overall, I rate it an 10 for Elijah, Billy,and Mazzo. I rate it a 7 for Rachel Leigh Cook, and I rate a 5 for that silly romantic scene that just didn't flow well with the movie(though I rewound and rewound a few times there...). I give a 9 to the ending because I like enigmatic things but it didn't flow perfectly either. Overall, that's about an 8.
First of all, I knew when starting this movie that it was going to be an indie, low-budget, sort of film, so I wasn't expecting some kind of Lord of The Rings or COlor Purple. I also knew not to expect anything too complex--in my experience with movies such as these, there is more there than just a simple, plausible plot that appeals to everybody. I knew going into it: Hey this is an Elijah Wood movie. Now everything I have seen him in, with the exception of Flipper, has been in some way great, and always told a great or complex story. Summing up all of those conclusions, I went into the movie knowing I shouldn't try to apply any other movie criticisms to it until I had seen it all the way through twice in order to fully catch the drift of the movie.
That being said, the movie was fair. I don't think it is the greatest thing he has ever done; it in no way compares to the Ice Storm or Lord of The Rings. However, I think the end of the movie sort of pulls everything together and helps me to see why Elijah might've chosen to do this movie.
Here is what I liked: The ending, the one that leaves everyone questioning a few things; the sarcastic kid, Billy, and his acerbic sence of humor; the thought processes of Barney Snow (Elijah Wood seems to have mastered the subtlety that is required for this role; Most people here complained that Barney was too apathetic for someone who knew nothing about his past or future, but I think it reflects some of Elijah's character in there too. At the end you see Elijah's happiness restored, when he is able to let go of everything (the very last scene), but throughout the movie it is quiet, subtle nuances; the introvert in Elijah shines through, and I think it is fantastic, and almsot mysterious.) I also liked Mazzo, I think he was a great actor in this movie, and the role worked well with him.
Here is what I disliked: The romantic scene with Rachel Leigh Cook when he finds out she is leaving for Europe...I think their chemistry is terrible, and I don't think the actors are to blame--I think the casting directors are to blame. EW and RLC can both be great, Elijah much more so than Rachel Leigh Cook, but I don't think they worked well together at all.
Suprisingly, I think he and Jordana Brewster from the Faculty had a better chemistry. Also, I think there was too little effort put into the love story. It was like...out of nowhere...they were in love...which is okay sometimes, as long as the characters' feelings are out in the open, but their feelings weren't out in the open. It made it seem strange that the cover of the video box was Elijah and RLC hugging; to me that wasn't the greater message of the movie. THe cover should have been Elijah as the central figure, and then, perhaps, the supporting characters behind him, sort of blended into the background.
Overall, I rate it an 10 for Elijah, Billy,and Mazzo. I rate it a 7 for Rachel Leigh Cook, and I rate a 5 for that silly romantic scene that just didn't flow well with the movie(though I rewound and rewound a few times there...). I give a 9 to the ending because I like enigmatic things but it didn't flow perfectly either. Overall, that's about an 8.
When I first came across this movie at the video store, I had previously heard nothing about it; however, the storyline interested me, and I was also familiar with both Elijah Wood and Rachael Leigh Cook.
As indicated in others' comments, the storyline depicts Barney Snow [Elijah Wood], a young man who is the only "non-terminal" patient in an experimental hospital for terminally-ill youngsters. He is initially advised by the doctor [Janeane Garofalo] to remain "detached" as he encounters the other patients. However, before long he develops friendships with several of them --- Allie, a young kid who stutters and has some sort of brain disease; Billy, a wisecracking but honest kid (he appears to me that he is in his teens) with a kidney disorder; and Alberto a.k.a "Mazzo", who appears to be around Barney's age, acts somewhat hostile and has bone cancer. Barney especially develops a close bond with Mazzo's fraternal twin sister Cassie [Rachael Leigh Cook], to whom he regularly reports Mazzo's condition as Mazzo won't see her when she visits.
The title comes from the notion that a bumblebee is able to fly even though scientifically its wings are too small, and this is the basis of the experiment being done on Barney.
Although I found the movie somewhat slow-moving, and the storyline sometimes unrealistic as he learns the truth of why he is there, I still enjoyed it. I like sensitive storylines, and even though I generally prefer they be a little less serious than what this was, this movie still ranks as one of my favorites. It was also the first time I had seen Elijah Wood in a role other than in a "cute little kiddie" or "teeny-bopper" movie, and I thought he did an excellent job. He and Rachael Leigh Cook seemed to work well together.
I wouldn't recommend this to everyone --- if you prefer something more upbeat, you probably would not like this movie. However, I would advise anyone who thinks this seems even remotely interesting to give it a chance.
As indicated in others' comments, the storyline depicts Barney Snow [Elijah Wood], a young man who is the only "non-terminal" patient in an experimental hospital for terminally-ill youngsters. He is initially advised by the doctor [Janeane Garofalo] to remain "detached" as he encounters the other patients. However, before long he develops friendships with several of them --- Allie, a young kid who stutters and has some sort of brain disease; Billy, a wisecracking but honest kid (he appears to me that he is in his teens) with a kidney disorder; and Alberto a.k.a "Mazzo", who appears to be around Barney's age, acts somewhat hostile and has bone cancer. Barney especially develops a close bond with Mazzo's fraternal twin sister Cassie [Rachael Leigh Cook], to whom he regularly reports Mazzo's condition as Mazzo won't see her when she visits.
The title comes from the notion that a bumblebee is able to fly even though scientifically its wings are too small, and this is the basis of the experiment being done on Barney.
Although I found the movie somewhat slow-moving, and the storyline sometimes unrealistic as he learns the truth of why he is there, I still enjoyed it. I like sensitive storylines, and even though I generally prefer they be a little less serious than what this was, this movie still ranks as one of my favorites. It was also the first time I had seen Elijah Wood in a role other than in a "cute little kiddie" or "teeny-bopper" movie, and I thought he did an excellent job. He and Rachael Leigh Cook seemed to work well together.
I wouldn't recommend this to everyone --- if you prefer something more upbeat, you probably would not like this movie. However, I would advise anyone who thinks this seems even remotely interesting to give it a chance.
The Bumblebee Flies Anyway was certainly a drama. People die, sad things happen, and the viewer is blown away by the stunning storytelling. That's what it's supposed to be, right? And was it, in this case? Sort of. Major plot points came and went without much surprise from me. But I still found it interesting and entertaining. The title comes from the fact that bumblebees are actually too big for their wings, and shouldn't be able to fly, but they do. The acting was fine, but it's funny to see that Elijah Wood did better than Janeane Garofolo. The script was similarly passable. Soundtrack: Pretty good, and sometimes quite effective.
On the plus side, some awesome questions are asked, and that's what makes this so powerful. I can't go into detail without giving away the plot. Overall, it's not a waste of time, but there are probably better movies out there. I'd recommend it for people who like to ponder philosophically.
On the plus side, some awesome questions are asked, and that's what makes this so powerful. I can't go into detail without giving away the plot. Overall, it's not a waste of time, but there are probably better movies out there. I'd recommend it for people who like to ponder philosophically.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesWhen Billy mentions calling a radio station to request on obscene song, the title he mentions is "Lick My Love Pump". That song is from Die Jungs von Spinal Tap (1984).
- Zitate
Barney Snow: [writing a note to himself] My name is Barney Snow. I was in a car crash. Red.
[folds the paper and sticks it under a desk lamp, then sighs and removes it]
Barney Snow: Great. I can't even remember my own name, how am I going to remember to look there?
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The Bumblebee Flies Anyway?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 35 Min.(95 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen