[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
IMDbPro

No Telling

  • 1991
  • Not Rated
  • 1 Std. 33 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,7/10
456
IHRE BEWERTUNG
No Telling (1991)
Horror

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuIn the name of medical research, a man experiments on animals. His relationship with his wife becomes stressed when she becomes inquisitive about his work.In the name of medical research, a man experiments on animals. His relationship with his wife becomes stressed when she becomes inquisitive about his work.In the name of medical research, a man experiments on animals. His relationship with his wife becomes stressed when she becomes inquisitive about his work.

  • Regie
    • Larry Fessenden
  • Drehbuch
    • Larry Fessenden
    • Beck Underwood
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Miriam Healy-Louie
    • Stephen Ramsey
    • David Van Tieghem
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    5,7/10
    456
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Larry Fessenden
    • Drehbuch
      • Larry Fessenden
      • Beck Underwood
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Miriam Healy-Louie
      • Stephen Ramsey
      • David Van Tieghem
    • 12Benutzerrezensionen
    • 16Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 1 Nominierung insgesamt

    Fotos5

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung26

    Ändern
    Miriam Healy-Louie
    • Lillian Gaines
    Stephen Ramsey
    • Geoffrey Gaines
    David Van Tieghem
    • Alex Vine
    Richard Topol
    Richard Topol
    • Philip Brown
    Ashley Arcement
    • Frances Boyd
    Robert Brady
    • Chuck Boyd
    Susan Doukas
    • Martha Boyd
    • (as Susan Dee)
    Ward Burlingham
    • Walter Fealy
    J.J. Clark
    • Sam Bates
    Stanley Taub
    • Dr Sykes
    Francois Lampietti
    • Simon Raft
    John Van Couvering
    • Peter Stone
    David Leslie
    • Gary
    Pamela Correnti
    • Waitress
    Raul Morfi
    • Delivery Man
    Gregory Morell
    • Delivery Man
    Neil Danziger
    • Man in White Coat
    Frank Dellario
    • Man in White Coat
    • Regie
      • Larry Fessenden
    • Drehbuch
      • Larry Fessenden
      • Beck Underwood
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen12

    5,7456
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    7lunarmm

    Striking visuals bring the message home!

    I caught this movie EARLY one morning on the Independent Film Channel. Although it's not the greatest film, it is definitely thought-provoking and I thought the visuals were amazing, especially the final images were seared in my memory.

    This film was made in 1991. Some may think this is stuff from Frankenstein and not give it another thought. It is now the year 2000 and these kind of animal and medical experiments are being done! After seeing this film, I felt like I had been kicked in the gut! Not many films have that power.
    8koralewski-s

    a little predictable, but a very good commentary on science versus sustainable solutions

    I'm a huge fan of sci-fi/thriller/horror films, and I think this film is definitely worth a watch. The pace is not as fast as some might like, but the storyline is definitely there and it's worth following to the end if you can give it time to unfold. The end was a little predictable, but that didn't make it any less impactful or horrifying for me. I'd highly recommend this to anyone who's interested in the early government conspiracy films of the early 70s (think Andromeda Strain, for example) or in the ongoing debate of making technological advances at whatever cost (i.e., stem cell research and animal experimentation).

    A good film. Worth seeing if you can find it (not currently on Netflix).
    7ThrownMuse

    Decent no-budget horror.

    This is part of what is apparently Fessenden's "Trilogy of Horror," though the horror to be found in this one is minimal. It looks like it was created on zero budget compared to Wendigo, but it is much more watchable due to its original take on a classic concept. Basic plot: Geoffrey, a scientist trying to get a grant for some top-secret work, moves to the country for the summer with his artist wife, Lillian. They grow apart because he spends to much time in the lab. She meets an environmentalist who is the antithesis of Geoffrey, and she starts questioning what exactly it is her hubby is doing in the lab all day. She makes it her mission to find out. Overall, it is a pretty uneven film. The acting is great at times and really inexcusably bad at other times. This, combined with poorly written dialogue, nearly ruins the few sequences that are supposed to be scary. One scene, which presents the viewer with some horrific imagery, has our protagonists responding somewhat lethargically, making it difficult for the viewer to be properly creeped-out by it. Some of the camera work is really creative, but some of it seems pointless. One stellar aspect throughout was the effectively creepy soundtrack. I didn't find this movie to be preachy. The story is really Lillian's, and it is rare to see a healthy splash of feminism thrown into a movie like this. Not recommended for people who cannot watch depictions of animal cruelty. The DVD includes a "making of" doc that is worth seeing.
    4athawolsux

    Somewhat intriguing but ultimately pointless

    I became interested in this movie after seeing Depraved, Larry Fessenden's latest effort, especially after seeing thematic comparisons being made between the two films.

    No Telling's plot is based on an intriguing idea and it tries to make a point about science and playing God, but ultimately it ends up being a pointless story. Nothing of note happens for much of the runtime, except for one powerful scene, and the acting is quite weak.
    xveganchrisx

    The real monsters of modern horror.. ourselves

    Despite a lot of the frustrated reviews this film got, I think credit should be given where appropriate. Fessenden is trying to remain true to the horror genre and in doing so, he analyzes modern problems such as pesticides, vivisection, etc. The Frankenstein story has been told many times in movies like The Island of Dr. Moreau, which was also about vivisection and tampering with nature. As far as the plot goes, it could have moved a little quicker. The acting was decent but nothing spectacular. Many ironies were pointed at throughout the movie such as people who eat meat but love their pet dogs and cats. If anything was offensive about this movie, it should have been! This whole genre itself has pointed the finger at what truly scares people and most often it is ourselves. Vivisection takes place legally, under the false notion that it gives us some kind of advancement. The fact that animal testing actually SLOWS the process of finding cures is scary. Change in the world has come from knocking down doors and exposing the ugly truth behind them and I think this movie does its job. Despite their low budget, they did it with the conviction that you don't find in most Holly(hollow)wood films.

    Mehr wie diese

    Habit
    6,4
    Habit
    Schizomaniac
    4,9
    Schizomaniac
    Habit
    6,6
    Habit
    Castle of Evil
    4,6
    Castle of Evil
    Robo Warriors
    4,7
    Robo Warriors
    Mixed Blood - Die Ratten von Harlem
    5,9
    Mixed Blood - Die Ratten von Harlem
    Experienced Movers
    3,8
    Experienced Movers
    The Woman Chaser
    7,0
    The Woman Chaser
    Seargeant Kabukiman
    5,7
    Seargeant Kabukiman
    Permanent Damage
    5,9
    Permanent Damage
    A Face in the Crowd
    4,1
    A Face in the Crowd
    Confessions of a Psycho Cat
    5,5
    Confessions of a Psycho Cat

    Verwandte Interessen

    Mia Farrow in Rosemaries Baby (1968)
    Horror

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Alternative Versionen
      The original cut of the film, which premiered at the Boston Film Festival and played in several other festivals (including Avoriaz), was longer. Director Larry Fessenden cut 20 minutes of footage for the theatrical release version.
    • Verbindungen
      Featured in The Making of 'No Telling' (2001)
    • Soundtracks
      What a Difference A Day Made
      Composed by Stanley Adams and María Grever

      Performed by Coleman Hawkins, Michael Warlop and His Orchestra Featuring Stéphane Grappelli and Django Reinhardt

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    Details

    Ändern
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Offizieller Standort
      • glass eye pix
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • La sindrome di Frankenstein
    • Drehorte
      • Sullivan County, New York, USA
    • Produktionsfirma
      • Glass Eye Pix
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 33 Min.(93 min)
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Mono
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.85 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.