Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA passenger jet loses a portion of its fuselage in flight over Hawaii and is forced to make an emergency landing.A passenger jet loses a portion of its fuselage in flight over Hawaii and is forced to make an emergency landing.A passenger jet loses a portion of its fuselage in flight over Hawaii and is forced to make an emergency landing.
- 1 Primetime Emmy gewonnen
- 1 wins total
- Michelle Honda
- (as Ana-Alicia)
- Man
- (as Dave Cass)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
As in the classic formula, the main characters have a bit of a backstory in the set-up before takeoff. The pilot (Wayne Rogers) is an ex-flyboy from the Vietnam War, the co-pilot (Connie Sellecca) is a woman in training, and one of the stewardesses (Ana Alicia) is a single mom who wants to set a good example for her daughter. The head stewardess is Nancy Kwan, although she unfortunately has a very small part. Other passengers include a honeymoon couple, a kid coming back from vacation, old folks who are nervous about flying, and the other usual tropes you'll usually find in a disaster movie. There's some "intense" music, some low-budget special effects, and an obvious "disaster-flick" script, but somehow this tv movie gives you an emotional experience.
The opening text told me what to expect, but I was at the edge of my seat with a lump in my throat the entire time. I couldn't believe what I was seeing, and I didn't know how anyone would make it out alive. And how did Ana Alicia get up the courage to keep throwing herself up and down the aisles to help people, knowing that if she let go for a second, she'd be sucked out of the plane and killed? Truly inspiring, and although cheesy, a must-see for disaster movie fans.
Compare this with "Apollo 13" (err, the movie, not the event), where certain events were "dramatized". What - an accident in space that could result in the deaths of all on board, for the first time ever, in space, on TV, is not dramatic enough????? I wonder whether "Apollo 13" would have been "better" or "worse" without this "dramatisation"? This movie certainly opens that question. This movie shows that the understated approach _can_ work.
I also agree with the comments about the "flying hair", not only of Connie Seleca, as mentioned, but of all the women involved. My recollection of stewardesses in the 1980s is that they were somewhat more professional in appearance; those who had long hair wore it up and back. Certainly in Australian airlines of the day the flowing hair was not tolerated. This is distracting from the drama. It gives a slight soft-core porn feel to the movie, which is unnecessary and inappropriate, and spoils the whole effect.
I too could think only of Trapper when looking at the pilot. He did seem to stretch the definition of "nonchalance" to the limit:-).
In summary, I agree with the sense of this group of guidelines. A very good movie. Realistic. As to the lack of surprise ending: it doesn't harm "Titanic", it doesn't harm this one, either.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe real-life Aloha Airlines Flight 243 accident that this film is based on happened on April 28, 1988.
- PatzerGail Kornberg's gold hoop earrings disappear and reappear throughout the movie.
- Zitate
Ed Meyer, Maui Tower Supervisor: OK 243, Maui Tower, just to verify, you broke up initially. You do need an ambulance, is that correct?
Mimi Tompkins: They still don't get it! Maui Tower, Paradise 243, affirmative!
Ed Meyer, Maui Tower Supervisor: Roger, how many do you think are injured?
Mimi Tompkins: We have no idea! We are going to need assistance. We cannot communicate with our flight attendants. We are going to need assistance for the passengers when we land.
Ed Meyer, Maui Tower Supervisor: Roger, 243. We have an ambulance on the way.
Mimi Tompkins: I hope he doesn't mean ambulance in the singular.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 802: Saint Maud (2021)