IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,4/10
31.972
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Die Hunde können sich in einer 4-köpfigen Familie unterhalten, in der Mama am selben Tag ihren Job verliert, an dem Papa einen Job als Pilot für einen süßen, alleinstehenden Chef bekommt.Die Hunde können sich in einer 4-köpfigen Familie unterhalten, in der Mama am selben Tag ihren Job verliert, an dem Papa einen Job als Pilot für einen süßen, alleinstehenden Chef bekommt.Die Hunde können sich in einer 4-köpfigen Familie unterhalten, in der Mama am selben Tag ihren Job verliert, an dem Papa einen Job als Pilot für einen süßen, alleinstehenden Chef bekommt.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 4 Nominierungen insgesamt
Danny DeVito
- Rocks
- (Synchronisation)
Diane Keaton
- Daphne
- (Synchronisation)
Sandra P. Grant
- Accountant
- (as Sandra Grant)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Look Who's Talking Now is not absolutely unwatchable and certainly not the worst movie ever made, but for me it is weakest of the series. I really enjoyed the first, and while watchable the second was a disappointment. Look Who's Talking Now has its good points, such as the soundtrack and the two dogs voiced wonderfully by Danny DeVito and Diane Keaton. Plus it is not too bad visually.
However, the concept has been done to death but the story feels very tired this time around, and to further disadvantage there are one too many thin and predictable gags and weak lines in the script. Other than DeVito and Keaton the other acting wasn't so impressive, this time John Travolta and Kirstie Alley seem to be phoning in their performances as the bickering couple. And the ending was far too sentimental for my liking.
Overall, perhaps worth the look but it is disappointing for me anyway. 3/10 Bethany Cox
However, the concept has been done to death but the story feels very tired this time around, and to further disadvantage there are one too many thin and predictable gags and weak lines in the script. Other than DeVito and Keaton the other acting wasn't so impressive, this time John Travolta and Kirstie Alley seem to be phoning in their performances as the bickering couple. And the ending was far too sentimental for my liking.
Overall, perhaps worth the look but it is disappointing for me anyway. 3/10 Bethany Cox
good family movie to watch on a Sunday evening full of goodness with talking dogs and this time the kids can talk for them selves also the wife is very paranoid about her husband so it ends up like bit of fights in her dreams Gangtok dogs bogs photogenic none flapping Sedgwick fisticuff this movie is great superb amazing fantastic outstanding dog fun for many people i would recommend this movie for a family of 3 or more so you can sit on your couch while the fire is on to enjoying a good comedy plus the mum(British term) and dad are the same actors so there cannot be any confusions an if any parents think this is bad for there child's life about finding out that Santa is a fake it shows you at the end that there is a Santa clause
At least the second film in this god-awful trilogy had the benefit of being so bad and inappropriate it was unintentionally hilarious. This scattershot, occasionally offensive, always unsettling and very dumb film is one of the most boring cinematic experiences in recent memory. The side plot of dogs, (how'd they score DeVito and Keaton, both of whom were doing much better that Alley or Travolta at this point in their carreers?), is useless; the 'dad is hard at work' subplot is just recycled from the second film, (they even use the same dream gag), and the plot doesn't really exist. And why does everyone keep ragging on Travolta's carreer? Being a pilot is no easy feat!
Travolta and Alley, who seem to get along in real life, seem to repel each other onscreen; maybe because they're platonically inclined to each other in reality; onscreen they're like two positively charged magnets pushing each other apart. On top of all that, the casual misogyny throughout is grating and extremely distasteful. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Travolta and Alley, who seem to get along in real life, seem to repel each other onscreen; maybe because they're platonically inclined to each other in reality; onscreen they're like two positively charged magnets pushing each other apart. On top of all that, the casual misogyny throughout is grating and extremely distasteful. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
For the most part this is a pretty fun movie and a good follow up in the "look who's talking" series. However, it needed to take another pass through the editing department. The family scenes are really well done and come across well, the plot itself is well developed, and the acting comparable. However, most of the early dog talking scenes and the dream sequences could have gone and not been missed.
While this is a bad film and the low point of Travolta's career he would bounce back a year later with Pulp Fiction.I watched this film as a kid and is a guilty pleasure.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesTabitha Lupien did her own basketball moves.
- PatzerAt the beginning of the movie when the parents are putting the children to bed, the window at the end of the hallway shows that it is still daytime.
- Zitate
[Daphne and Rocks are starting at each other]
Julie Ubriacco: Look! They like each other!
James: [to Mollie] See honey, they like each other.
Daphne: Mongrel.
Rocks: Bitch.
- Alternative VersionenThe music video "It's Christmas, C'est Noel" starring by Jordy Lemoine and the movie main stars during the end credits, was deleted on DVD editions, being replaced for a classic end credits roll with "Sleigh Ride" as musical score.
- SoundtracksHound Dog
Written by Jerry Leiber & Mike Stoller
Performed by Elvis Presley
Courtesy of The RCA Records Label of BMG Music
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 22.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 10.340.263 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 4.022.570 $
- 7. Nov. 1993
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 10.340.263 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 36 Min.(96 min)
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen