[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
IMDbPro

Lautloser Regen

Originaltitel: Rain Without Thunder
  • 1992
  • PG-13
  • 1 Std. 25 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,0/10
343
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Lautloser Regen (1992)
Dystopian Sci-FiLegal DramaPolitical DramaDramaSci-Fi

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuIt's the year 2042 and the threat is real...women are going to prison for terminating their pregnancies. An investigating reporter is determined to reveal the truth behind the convictions.It's the year 2042 and the threat is real...women are going to prison for terminating their pregnancies. An investigating reporter is determined to reveal the truth behind the convictions.It's the year 2042 and the threat is real...women are going to prison for terminating their pregnancies. An investigating reporter is determined to reveal the truth behind the convictions.

  • Regie
    • Gary O. Bennett
  • Drehbuch
    • Gary O. Bennett
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Betty Buckley
    • Carolyn McCormick
    • Iona Morris
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    5,0/10
    343
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Gary O. Bennett
    • Drehbuch
      • Gary O. Bennett
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Betty Buckley
      • Carolyn McCormick
      • Iona Morris
    • 21Benutzerrezensionen
    • 6Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Fotos2

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung42

    Ändern
    Betty Buckley
    Betty Buckley
    • Beverly Goldring
    Carolyn McCormick
    Carolyn McCormick
    • Reporter
    Iona Morris
    Iona Morris
    • Andrea Murdoch
    Steve Zahn
    Steve Zahn
    • Jeremy Tanner
    Jeff Daniels
    Jeff Daniels
    • Jonathan Garson
    Ali Thomas
    • Allison Goldring
    Stuart Burney
    • Spencer Goldring
    Eliza Clark
    Eliza Clark
    • Piper Goldring
    Heather Lilly
    • Micka Goldring
    Alyssa Rallo Bennett
    Alyssa Rallo Bennett
    • Author Max Sinclair
    Helen Lloyd Breed
    • Alice Kappelhoff
    Katy Selverstone
    Katy Selverstone
    • Abra Russell
    • (as Katherine Selverstone)
    Frederic Forrest
    Frederic Forrest
    • Walker Point Warden
    Charles E. Gerber
    Charles E. Gerber
    • Grover Cole
    Bahni Turpin
    • 'Baby Bomb' Prisoner
    Ming-Na Wen
    Ming-Na Wen
    • 'Uudie' Prisoner
    • (as Ming Na Wen)
    John Scott
    • Health Official #1
    Andrew Spencer
    • Health Official #2
    • Regie
      • Gary O. Bennett
    • Drehbuch
      • Gary O. Bennett
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen21

    5,0343
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    t_habrock

    Too preachy and leading

    This movie could have been an interesting look at the abortion debate, however what you get is a one-sided movie that is meant to provoke paranoia.

    The movie over-indulges in perhaps one of my biggest pet peeves -- instead of letting me decide how I feel about a character and their views, it telegraphs what I'm supposed to feel, which is okay when characters are given dimension, however these characters are all pretty one-sided -- the pro-choice characters are portrayed as good but victimized people, while the pro-life side is portrayed as ominous, evil, vindictive and manipulative. No dimensions, no shades of gray, just black and white, pro-choice good and pro-life bad.

    Let me add one caveat, I am not pro-life and my feelings on this movie are not based on my feelings about abortion. I would have felt the same if the movie had reversed the roles and made the pro-choice people "evil", much like you see on TBN or the like...
    6mjneu59

    a novel approach to a familiar debate

    In the year 2042 a young college student is arrested with her mother under a new law charging them with 'fetal kidnapping', after flying to Sweden to terminate the girl's pregnancy. The set up might suggest nothing more than a thinly veiled pro-choice propaganda lecture, but the remarkably even-handed approach to a volatile subject helps make it one of the more provocative dramas in quite a while. First-time writer director Gary Bennett set himself a demanding task by designing the film to look like a documentary-in-progress, with the issues set forth through candid interviews with family, friends, lawyers, legislators, and so forth. The challenge was to write talking-head monologues that had to sound unscripted, and direct a cast of recognizable faces to look as unrehearsed as possible. The ominous music cues don't suit the mock-documentary format, and some of the pro-life fundamentalists are a little too unspeakably inhuman, but for the most part the film is a fascinating blend of science fiction with social fact, offering a compelling speculation into an all-too plausible near-future scenario.
    6hkg202

    well constructed premise, mediocre production values

    As a disclaimer, I should note that I am a friend of the director, who, by the way, is a wonderful person and very fun to work with. His film, however, has it's issues. The soundtrack is really terrible, and the all-interview, talking-heads format is limiting. These things, however, are obviously the result of a very small budget, not just bad filmmaking. The story was what impressed me, specifically the way Bennett describes the series of small changes in the political and religious arenas that could very plausibly lead to a reversal of Roe v. Wade. Unfortunately the film was released right after Clinton was elected, and people were feeling very comfortable and safe under a new, liberal administration. I think the purpose of _Rain Without Thunder_ is not "preach to the choir" but rather to keep the choir from growing complacent. And even if you're unimpressed with the plot, it's lots of fun to spot now-stars like Ming-Na and Steve Zahn (not to mention that woman from the Nicorette ads).
    9drchazan

    Scary because it could come true

    I think that most of the people who don't like this movie don't know a little bit of the background regarding one reference - Margaret Atwood's book (and movie) The Handmaid's Tale. Notice that Linda Hunt's character is from the Atwood society. Without that reference, I'm not sure everyone can understand the full weight of this film.

    Moreover, I think anyone who wants to really know if this film has a basis in reality should just look at what's happening (slowly, but apparently surely) in the USA regarding abortion laws today. Yes, this could happen in the USA and that makes it the most scary movie I've ever seen.

    A must-see for anyone who is interested in abortion issues (although pro-lifers will certainly call it bunk).
    random-70778

    Amazing ignorant of abortion laws worldwide. Main character going to Sweden for mid term abortion?

    Firstly in 1992, when this film was made, and today, the US has and does give MORE rights to women when it comes to abortion than Sweden does. Yet this bizarre film has the protagonist going to Sweden to get an abortion.

    Newsflash: in Europe people LEAVE Sweden to get abortions. today and for decades in Sweden after 18 weeks women cannot have an "at will" abortion, there must be a threat to the woman's health. In the US the average is 20-22 weeks.

    Mehr wie diese

    Eine herzliche Affäre
    5,4
    Eine herzliche Affäre
    Brennendes Schicksal
    6,8
    Brennendes Schicksal
    Die Augen meines Vaters
    5,7
    Die Augen meines Vaters
    Rage - Irrsinnige Gewalt
    5,5
    Rage - Irrsinnige Gewalt
    Die Maulwürfe
    5,8
    Die Maulwürfe
    Checking Out
    4,8
    Checking Out
    Sweethearts Dance - Liebe ist mehr als nur ein Wort
    5,7
    Sweethearts Dance - Liebe ist mehr als nur ein Wort
    Chasing Sleep
    6,2
    Chasing Sleep
    Marie - Eine wahre Geschichte
    6,6
    Marie - Eine wahre Geschichte
    Timescape
    6,4
    Timescape
    Noch dümmer
    5,8
    Noch dümmer
    South Beach
    7,9
    South Beach

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      Ming-na Wen and Steve Zahn's film debut.
    • Crazy Credits
      If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet avoid confrontation, are people who want crops without plowing up the ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning; they want the ocean without the roar of its waters - Frederick Douglass

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 5. Februar 1993 (Vereinigte Staaten)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Rain Without Thunder
    • Drehorte
      • Detroit, Michigan, USA(1992)
    • Produktionsfirma
      • Taz Pictures Production
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
      • 11.602 $
    • Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
      • 6.478 $
      • 7. Feb. 1993
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      1 Stunde 25 Minuten
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Ultra Stereo
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.85 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    Lautloser Regen (1992)
    Oberste Lücke
    By what name was Lautloser Regen (1992) officially released in Canada in English?
    Antwort
    • Weitere Lücken anzeigen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.