Mord in der Rue Morgue

Edgar Allan Poe's story sees another adaptation in this 80s made-for-TV outing starring some names in George C Scott, Rebecca De Mornay and Val Kilmer. It's diverting, but very unexceptional and stagy in the details. In honesty it's the strong performances that really carry this one, especially a stalwart Scott and a headstrong De Mornay. How the cast worked of each other kept me glued. Some atmospherics are etched out nicely, with fitting period details of a turn of a century Paris and there's a dark, grim air lurking about. The deaths happen off screen, but there's something ghastly about them and that's mainly due to its effective use of sound. However the story is all about the investigation/mystery of two murdered women and it's somewhat stiff in its execution of it. Even with the script throwing around ideas, theories in its quest to uncover the motive of the puzzling deaths it just fared as a typical crime plot of outrageous circumstances. Still at least it didn't find itself getting distracted by certain sub-plots. Earnest entertainment.

When the basic story of a film is good, you naturally want to like it. But, sometimes, about half of the way through, you realize that it hasn't lived up to expectations. Edgar Allan Poe wrote a fantastic tale, no doubts there. But this film is sadly misguided.

Several factors contribute to this. First, David Epstein's screenplay effectively rips all the subtlety out of the source material. Second, director Jeannot Szwarc makes absolutely no attempt to film this in a way that takes advantage of its low budget and venue. Finally, the casting is utterly random. Accents and nationalities are thrown together with total abandon.

In spite of all that, some the cast members manage to put in good performances. George C. Scott (as Auguste Dupin) is really excellent, with great command of his dialogue. Naturally, he is miscast, but acts as if he is in a far better film. A very young Val Kilmer (as Phillipe) is good, but has almost nothing to work with. He too, is miscast, though the main reason I originally watched this. Ian McShane is certainly entertaining, but his character has no subtlety.

After the acting, there's little to say. The only quality the film has left it owes to its source material. This might have been acceptable for an original script, but as a badly adapted story, it is simply disappointing.

The editing seems haphazard at points, either that important scenes were removed, or never filmed. Dupin's realization of the culprit is never explained, nor the contents of his newspaper ad, or any of his deductive process for that matter. Phillipe's process of discovering Adolphe's unfaithfulness is also never explained.

Finally, the intelligence of the script dips considerably by the final scenes. I won't elaborate, but they have all the brains of a 1950s horror B movie. Really weak.

RATING: 6.2 out of 10

I've been waiting to see this film for about 10 years. There never was and there NEVER will be a truly great screen adaptation of Edgar Allan Poe. Because it can't be done. Given that Poe is definitely one of my favourite writers, you probably would suggest that I shouldn't watch any movie (or TV movie) based on one of his writings. True. But I love movies, and one of the best I've seen is The Pit and the Pendulum, directed by the great Roger Corman, which is an adaptation of Poe's short story and has virtually NOTHING to do with it. But Corman is Corman and he did 5 or 6 movies based (inspired by...) on Poe, and they're all classics (if you love this kind of cinema), and Vincent Price is absolutely splendid and...enough about history. Therefore, you should never expect a brilliant(or even decent)adaptation of Poe, but if you agree with that and if you are prepared to swallow characters and facts that aren't present in Poe's story (Murders in the Rue Morgue, that is) then you're in for a treat. The lugubrious atmosphere, the fluid camerawork, the impressive production design and the magnificent location all add panache to a well told (by David Epstein) and well directed (by Jeannot "Somewhere in Time" Szwarc) tale. And let's not forget the great, late George C.Scott, whose presence alone makes the film worthwile. And listen closely...If you love Poe just on paper, better stay away! If you haven't read the story (and if you like Scott), stick with it! Just remember - if you want a gore movie, wait till Dario Argento makes his own version. If you want an intellectual/perverse/subversive flick, talk to Polanski or De Palma. This one is just a TV movie.

While the basic crime plot of Poe's story is the framework of this color film noir, we have tacked onto it a melange of elements not in the story, not the least of which is having Dupin as a cashiered, or maybe just retired, Inspector of Police. The "real" Dupin was often consulted by the Prefect of Police, but he was a private citizen, a recluse if you will, with marvelous powers of ratiocination. Furthermore, where did the writers get the idea that the Prefect hated Dupin. According to the stories he pretended a supercilious attitude, but knew that often without Dupin he was nowhere. In this film, we see Dupin at work but get no details about his "ratiocination". It's a good cast, though, and interesting seeing them at work. Give it an A+ for atmosphere, but a C- for classic tale telling.

This modest but solid mid-80s TV thriller/horror is the third film version based on Edgar Allan Poe's short story with the same bone-chilling title, but they are all very different. The oldest one, released in 1932, is a delightful contemporary Mad-Scientist movie starring Bela Lugosi. The 1971 version, featuring names like Jason Robards and Herbert Lom, is also typical for its period of release, as it's a slasher set in a flamboyant Grand-Guignol theater. This version, starring the legendary George C. Scott and upcoming young talent Val Kilmer, is perhaps the least spectacular one of the bunch, but it is the adaptation that remains the most faithful to Poe's tale.

Poe's fictional character August Dupin, elegantly depicted by Scott, was actually the first super-intelligent detective. If, during "The Murders in the Rue Morgue", the character of Dupin reminds you of immortal sleuths like Sherlock Holmes or Hercule Poirot, do realize they were invented by their respective authors much later. At the beginning of the story, Dupin is embittered because he got forced to retire by the obnoxious Prefect of Police. Even a visit from his acolyte Philippe or the engagement of his beautiful daughter Claire can't cheer him up. When the whole of Paris is struck by fear and panic due to the indescribably gruesome murders of two women inside their house, Dupin finally considers focusing on something else than his chess board. Claire's fiancé is the police's only suspect, but Dupin quickly deducts the truth behind the murders is far more unusual.

If you read Poe's tale or seen the previous versions, the climax of "The Murders in the Rue Morgue" doesn't come as a surprise, of course, but the film nevertheless remains compelling thanks to the performances and the marvelous decors & scenery. Jeannot Szwarc, a more than competent genre director (and, moreover, French) clearly wanted the recreation of Paris at the turn of the century to be very detailed and accurate. Unfortunately, the pivotal murders occur off-screen. Probably because it's a TV-film production and/or because they are described in Poe's wicked imagination as ultimately savage. Poor us, horror fanatics, we don't get to see anything. Not even any short clips of the ripped apart corpses upon their discovery.