Während Andys Mutter in eine psychiatrische Klinik eingeliefert wird, wird der kleine Junge in Pflegefamilien untergebracht, und Chucky, die entschlossen ist, Andys Seele zu beanspruchen, is... Alles lesenWährend Andys Mutter in eine psychiatrische Klinik eingeliefert wird, wird der kleine Junge in Pflegefamilien untergebracht, und Chucky, die entschlossen ist, Andys Seele zu beanspruchen, ist nicht weit davon entfernt.Während Andys Mutter in eine psychiatrische Klinik eingeliefert wird, wird der kleine Junge in Pflegefamilien untergebracht, und Chucky, die entschlossen ist, Andys Seele zu beanspruchen, ist nicht weit davon entfernt.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
- Chucky
- (Synchronisation)
- Van Driver
- (as Charles C. Meshack)
- Liquor Store Clerk
- (as Herb Braha)
- Tommy Doll
- (Synchronisation)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
But, there's something important to think about. A key question. Does it work?
And the answer to that question: Sort of, I guess.
Following a wild opening in which Chucky (voiced by the fantastic Brad Dourif) is re-constructed in a way that I actually found quite intriguing, he escapes and sets off to find his old target- young Andy Barclay (Alex Vincent), who is in the process of being placed into a new foster home. With his new body, Chucky hopes to finally be able to transfer his tormented spirit into a human host once and for all. And so a sort-of deadly game begins, as Chucky infiltrates Andy's new home, and toys with him, causing him distress and picking off the people around him, leading up to a final confrontation that I can only describe as epic in scope and quite satisfying.
Returning screenwriter Don Mancini seems more at home this time around (after some apparent drama with the first film going into rewrites), and relishes in the chaos of the storyline. You can feel a writer just having fun with the material when you watch this film. Everything is bigger. Stakes rise to new heights. Set-pieces are more encompassing and wild. And there are new ideas being explored left and right.
John Lafia's guidance as director is quite good. While the original film was slick and grounded, Lafia here goes for stylized visuals that lend a unique quality to the film, making it feel more akin to a fairy-tale. And I really enjoyed that aspect of the production. Although at times it does take you out of the movie, because things are a little TOO stylish. (A scene where a character has to run around a maze of boxes, while suspenseful, will probably make you chuckle and exclaim "Who stacks boxes like that?!")
I found the performances admirable. Alex Vincent grows quite a bit as a young performer. Though I didn't mention it in my review of the first film, I never found his acting organic or believable. He was just a little too young and a little too cute for you to believe the emotions he was trying to convey. But here, he knocks it out of the park. He's a bit older, as had more experience acting, and is able to give a really remarkable, compelling performance for a child-actor. Supporting roles by the likes of Christine Elise and Jenny Agutter are also quite good. Particularly Elise as "Kyle", Andy's older "Foster Sister", who becomes the person he connects with most in the story. She has a lot of heart in her performance, and comes off well on- screen, and along with Andy, is the one person you really care for.
And of course there is Brad Dourif. He IS Chucky. His role is a perfect blend of different elements, combining to create a near-ideal slasher-movie villain. Dourif's voice is commanding and threatening, yet also oddly endearing and amusing when it needs to be. His delivery is spot-on in every scene. And he is able to take charge of every scene he's in.
All of this being said, I do think there are a lot of fundamental issues with the film. And I do believe that despite rampant strengths, it just doesn't quite "gel together" as it did in the first movie.
Despite the more grandiose scale and qualities of the film, I thought it didn't do quite as good a job at forging human connections. With so much chaotic content, the smaller moments just seemed to become lost in translation, which is a pretty big issue. This is a film of style over substance.
I also felt that the film lost me at a few times. Some of the performers aren't up to snuff (despite the main cast being great), some of the deaths are bizarre and weak, and some moments just seemed silly, or went on for far too long.
If the film could have gone through just a little bit more trimming and re-editing, I think it could easily have matched the quality of the original.
But still, as it stands, "Child's Play 2" is highly enjoyable, albeit flawed. And I think that in the grand scheme of things, it's definitely worth checking out for all fans of horror. If the story doesn't win you over, the crazy, mythical style just might.
I give it an average 6 out of 10.
Another amazing performance by Alex Vincent who starred as Andy. He did great in this sequel and it was great seeing him on screen again. He brought on a incredible performance going against Chucky once again. Also Brad Dourif did great playing the Voice of Chucky. Chucky was funny and dangerous this time around again. Also great acting by Christine Elise and the entire cast.
I recommend Child's Play 2 and The Child's Play Series To Everyone. Looking forward In Seeing More Created. PHENOMENAL HORROR CLASSIC!
The evil Chucky doll finds his way to the household, switches places with the toy doll and buries it, setting the stage for things to come. Credibility really is strained by the time we get to the schoolroom scene where Chucky has followed the boy to school, lands magically in his classroom and manages to start trouble between the boy and the teacher, who subsequently gets killed by Chucky after the boy has climbed out a window. Takes quite an imagination to think of these plot lines, but when the imagination runs wild plausibility begins to suffer.
Following the schoolhouse segment, the bizarre incidents keep piling up as Chucky gets away with more and more havoc and no one believes the boy is telling the truth--just as in the original.
None of the incidents are as startling or as well staged as in CHILD'S PLAY, but it still manages to hold the interest with some original touches tinged with fright and a weird sense of humor. Especially good are the effects toward the end when Chucky holds the spunky adopted girl and boy captive as the story speeds toward an ending in the toy factory. The factory sequence has some grotesque chills as one of the workers gets caught up in the doll machinery and Chucky himself suffers quite a few "happenings" at the toy factory before he's liquidated by the boy.
Entertaining nonsense despite the strain on credibility.
**1/2 (out of four)
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThere were many rumors about why Catherine Hicks didn't reprise her role as Karen Barclay in the sequel with the popular being that she was pregnant by husband Kevin Yagher who operated the animatronic Chucky doll, but the simple fact was that the director John Lafia wanted to take the story in a new direction. A direction that didn't include her character aside from a unfilmed opening courtroom scene that had her be sent to a mental institution. Despite not reprising her role, she was constantly on set for the sequel to visit her husband.
- PatzerAt the end of the first movie when Chucky is burnt, his left eye is there and his right is melted shut. But at the beginning of this movie, when they are cleaning him, his left eye is gone and his right eye is opened and there.
- Zitate
Andy Barclay: [Approaches the Good Guy doll who reminds him of Chucky] I hate you.
Chucky: [In a Good Guy voice] Hi, I'm... Tommy, and I'm your friend to the end! Hidey-ho! Ha, ha, ha!
- Alternative VersionenThe bootleg workprint contained graphic shots of the teacher being killed.
- VerbindungenEdited into Heads Blow Up! (2011)
- SoundtracksNew China
Written and Performed by Vox Populi International
Produced by John Stanley
Top-Auswahl
- How long is Child's Play 2?Powered by Alexa
- How did Chucky escape from the Simpsons' basement?
- What happened to Andy's mother Karen Barclay from the original "Child's Play"?
- How did Chucky come back to life?
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Chucky: el muñeco diabólico 2
- Drehorte
- 118 Pier S Ave, Long Beach, Kalifornien, USA(Play Pals Toy Factory)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 13.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 28.501.605 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 10.718.520 $
- 11. Nov. 1990
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 35.763.605 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 24 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1