IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,8/10
25.965
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine amerikanische Tiefseeminenkolonie stolpert über ein versunkenes sowjetisches Schiff, das ein schreckliches Geheimnis verbirgt.Eine amerikanische Tiefseeminenkolonie stolpert über ein versunkenes sowjetisches Schiff, das ein schreckliches Geheimnis verbirgt.Eine amerikanische Tiefseeminenkolonie stolpert über ein versunkenes sowjetisches Schiff, das ein schreckliches Geheimnis verbirgt.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Eugene Lipinski
- Russian Ship Captain
- (as Eugene Lipinsky)
Tom Woodruff Jr.
- Lead Creature
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Leviathan is one of those films that has "rip-off" written all over it.
Alot of it you've seen before in better films. The most obvious comparisons being Alien ( several isolated crew members, the dubious doctor, the suits etc.) and of course The Thing (a gooey monster spawned from human beings, it getting to the blood supply). I've viewed this one a few times and although it is an inferior movie it does have some pretty neat special effects, a recognizable cast and a decent music score by Jerry Goldsmith.
Not a total wet squib - it certainly has its moments. I'd give it 7/10.
Alot of it you've seen before in better films. The most obvious comparisons being Alien ( several isolated crew members, the dubious doctor, the suits etc.) and of course The Thing (a gooey monster spawned from human beings, it getting to the blood supply). I've viewed this one a few times and although it is an inferior movie it does have some pretty neat special effects, a recognizable cast and a decent music score by Jerry Goldsmith.
Not a total wet squib - it certainly has its moments. I'd give it 7/10.
Ah, yes, underwater sci-fi (and horror). From 'The abyss,' to 'SeaQuest,' to 2020's 'Underwater,' and everything in between, the niche genre has been a darling of enterprising filmmakers and studio executives. Reliably solid production design and art direction, robust effects and enticing designs for any associated creatures or entities, large casts, swell scores from well-known composers - 1989's 'Leviathan' fits the bill neatly. It really does look and sound great, and one notes what seems to me to be a fairly large budget to capitalize on what was at the time quite a trend in film. I'm not saying it's the most wholly engaging and essential of pictures, but this is a pretty good time all the same.
To repeat myself a bit, the contributions of all those behind the scenes are terrific. Costume design, hair and makeup work, effects practical and digital, props and weapons, set design and decoration, lighting, and all other such elements are superb; the facilities of the mining operation are a feast for the eyes. Direction, cinematography, editing, and the fundamentals of film-making are tight, with fine production values. There are recognizable names and faces among the ensemble, and I think everyone on hand gives swell performances.
More substantively, I think the screenplay is pretty capable in general. Characters and dialogue sometimes leave a bit to be desired, but the narrative is pretty strong, even if it's familiar in broad strokes. The scene writing is the best part of David Peoples and Jeb Stuart's contribution, with light humor in the suitable exposition that quickly gives way to growing mystery and mounting horror. And that's really the key: one could assess every little aspect day in and day out, but at the end of the day the real question is how effectively the sci-fi horror is realized - and in my opinion it's splendidly strong in 'Leviathan.' Yes, one can immediately discern clear inspiration from very famous previous titles, in multiple instances to the point of pure mimicry. That's a sure mark against this, but taken in and of itself the marine monster movie is stimulating and satisfying. The picture is filled with tinges of body horror, flashes of action-horror, and an abundance of creature feature fun. All the blood and gore, prosthetics, and fabricated creature effects are outstanding; for the strength of these alone I'd say 'Leviathan' is worth watching.
What it all comes down to for me is that by and large I think this is perfectly entertaining, with fantastic exploration of what sci-fi horror could be in the underwater setting. While it's imperfect in the first place, the biggest limiting factor is simply how how the picture undeniably borrows. If you've seen John Carpenter's 'The thing,' and if you've seen Ridley Scott's 'Alien,' then there's no small amount of George P. Cosmatos' 'Leviathan' that's going to feel recycled. It looks, sounds, and feels good, but the comparisons are so significant that they distinctly distract and detract from the viewing experience. I suppose on that note that the good news is, if you're approaching this with virginal eyes, it's going to be better still. For whatever issues it may bear, though, this is still a flick that's a sturdy recommendation for fans of the cast, and for the genre overall. So long as you don't mind abject parroting, 'Leviathan' is satisfyingly enjoyable, and not a bad way to spend 100 minutes.
To repeat myself a bit, the contributions of all those behind the scenes are terrific. Costume design, hair and makeup work, effects practical and digital, props and weapons, set design and decoration, lighting, and all other such elements are superb; the facilities of the mining operation are a feast for the eyes. Direction, cinematography, editing, and the fundamentals of film-making are tight, with fine production values. There are recognizable names and faces among the ensemble, and I think everyone on hand gives swell performances.
More substantively, I think the screenplay is pretty capable in general. Characters and dialogue sometimes leave a bit to be desired, but the narrative is pretty strong, even if it's familiar in broad strokes. The scene writing is the best part of David Peoples and Jeb Stuart's contribution, with light humor in the suitable exposition that quickly gives way to growing mystery and mounting horror. And that's really the key: one could assess every little aspect day in and day out, but at the end of the day the real question is how effectively the sci-fi horror is realized - and in my opinion it's splendidly strong in 'Leviathan.' Yes, one can immediately discern clear inspiration from very famous previous titles, in multiple instances to the point of pure mimicry. That's a sure mark against this, but taken in and of itself the marine monster movie is stimulating and satisfying. The picture is filled with tinges of body horror, flashes of action-horror, and an abundance of creature feature fun. All the blood and gore, prosthetics, and fabricated creature effects are outstanding; for the strength of these alone I'd say 'Leviathan' is worth watching.
What it all comes down to for me is that by and large I think this is perfectly entertaining, with fantastic exploration of what sci-fi horror could be in the underwater setting. While it's imperfect in the first place, the biggest limiting factor is simply how how the picture undeniably borrows. If you've seen John Carpenter's 'The thing,' and if you've seen Ridley Scott's 'Alien,' then there's no small amount of George P. Cosmatos' 'Leviathan' that's going to feel recycled. It looks, sounds, and feels good, but the comparisons are so significant that they distinctly distract and detract from the viewing experience. I suppose on that note that the good news is, if you're approaching this with virginal eyes, it's going to be better still. For whatever issues it may bear, though, this is still a flick that's a sturdy recommendation for fans of the cast, and for the genre overall. So long as you don't mind abject parroting, 'Leviathan' is satisfyingly enjoyable, and not a bad way to spend 100 minutes.
How can you go wrong with a Robocop, a Ghostbuster, a burglar from Home Alone, Pretty Woman and Axel Foley's personal assistants, and Richard Crenna????
Does it rip off Aliens? YES. Does it rip off The Thing? YES...but who really gives a rip?!?! It's just fun. Give me Stan Winston's practical effects any day too!
I remember going to the theatres when it came out, but I think I enjoyed it even more watching it 35 years later in retrospect. The stars and dialogue from the 80's was delightfully nostalgic. Grab the popcorn and go to town.
The kids might not get it, but if you were a product of the times, give it a rewatch!
Does it rip off Aliens? YES. Does it rip off The Thing? YES...but who really gives a rip?!?! It's just fun. Give me Stan Winston's practical effects any day too!
I remember going to the theatres when it came out, but I think I enjoyed it even more watching it 35 years later in retrospect. The stars and dialogue from the 80's was delightfully nostalgic. Grab the popcorn and go to town.
The kids might not get it, but if you were a product of the times, give it a rewatch!
However, that is not to say that it isn't entertaining, because it is. The film is about a group of undersea miners who discover a Soviet wreck. The wreck contains a potion that of course, one of the crew members has to drink. The potion turns out to be a formula that turns people into reptile like monsters that will eventually spread their symptoms to everybody else on board.
We have seen this all before. The Thing, the Alien series, The Deep, etc all have one idea or another that were thrown into this film. You have got the creature that takes over people's bodies(Alien, The Thing), the blood supply being depleted by the creature(The Thing), the remainder of the crew trying to escape the ship in a limited amount of time before it self destructs(Alien), and the scene where all of the guys are sitting around eating, talking about sex and other things(Alien).
This movie could have been a lot better if they had thrown something original into it. Why not use more comic relief? That may have spiced up the film a bit. However, the film is not that bad and if you cannot find anymore decent sci-fi horror films to view, this one may just be up your alley.
We have seen this all before. The Thing, the Alien series, The Deep, etc all have one idea or another that were thrown into this film. You have got the creature that takes over people's bodies(Alien, The Thing), the blood supply being depleted by the creature(The Thing), the remainder of the crew trying to escape the ship in a limited amount of time before it self destructs(Alien), and the scene where all of the guys are sitting around eating, talking about sex and other things(Alien).
This movie could have been a lot better if they had thrown something original into it. Why not use more comic relief? That may have spiced up the film a bit. However, the film is not that bad and if you cannot find anymore decent sci-fi horror films to view, this one may just be up your alley.
Leviathan follows the crew of a deep sea mining expedition who discover a wreck of a Soviet ship - the Leviathan, which is supposedly still in service. Exploring the wreck they find evidence of a mysterious 'illness' that took the lives of those on board. After smuggling some vodka back from the wreck, one of the crew starts to show signs of the same condition that killed the ship's crew, and after mutating into a genetic abomination begins to hunt the rest down...
Despite some big names this film has b-movie written all over it. Granted, the sets and special effects are actually quite good, with some disgusting body horror and slimy creatures, but the basic plot, characters and dialog feel like they are straight from a 50's sci fi horror. Not that there's anything wrong with that of course, but while watching this I did feel like I was watching a poor mans 'The Thing', with a sprinkling of Alien... and considering this came out a whole decade after the latter, at this point you really need to be stepping up your game. The characters and dialog are not as good as Alien, the paranoia and atmosphere is not as good as The Thing, and the underwater setting and special effects are not as good as in The Abyss (which came out the same year). It doesn't really bring anything new to the table to justify it's own existance, and as such ends up feeling derivative in pretty much every way.
Still, it's not exactly terrible or anything, and if you are into this kind of thing it can provide some passable entertainment. It's just not as good as any of the films that have so very obviously inspired it...
Despite some big names this film has b-movie written all over it. Granted, the sets and special effects are actually quite good, with some disgusting body horror and slimy creatures, but the basic plot, characters and dialog feel like they are straight from a 50's sci fi horror. Not that there's anything wrong with that of course, but while watching this I did feel like I was watching a poor mans 'The Thing', with a sprinkling of Alien... and considering this came out a whole decade after the latter, at this point you really need to be stepping up your game. The characters and dialog are not as good as Alien, the paranoia and atmosphere is not as good as The Thing, and the underwater setting and special effects are not as good as in The Abyss (which came out the same year). It doesn't really bring anything new to the table to justify it's own existance, and as such ends up feeling derivative in pretty much every way.
Still, it's not exactly terrible or anything, and if you are into this kind of thing it can provide some passable entertainment. It's just not as good as any of the films that have so very obviously inspired it...
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe experience was an adventure and a joy for Stan Winston and his monster-making team. Not only did they get to live in Rome for four months during filming, and even learn scuba diving, a recreational activity many of them continue to pursue to this day, but they also got to work with a director who was unusually generous with inviting their input. In addition to producing the creature effects, Cosmatos trusted Winston to direct the second unit action sequences. "George Cosmatos always let us take the lead in how to shoot the creature," noted Landon. "He was such a big-hearted person, he would throw up his hands, and say 'I don't know what I'm doing.' He'd just admit it and let us do what we knew how to do. We know what our characters can do and we know the best way to use them. We're thinking about what our characters are going to have to do on the set the entire time we're building them. So we are goldmines of information and knowledge. Some directors recognize that, and really rely on us."
- PatzerIn the scene where the piece of the monster is cut off by the door, the wire that pulls the cut off piece down can be seen.
- Zitate
Martin: I realize you must have gone through hell.
Justin Jones: Gone? Bitch, we're still here!
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Leviathan?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 25.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 15.704.614 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 5.029.164 $
- 19. März 1989
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 15.704.614 $
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen