Tödliche Tricks

Good Scenes and Good acting. however? The writers should have come up with a better ending. Peter Falk should have insisted on it. Columbo actually risks his life betting that the murderer will try to TAKE his life at the end. If he didn't take the bait? Columbo would have been killed, I will not say how. People need to watch it. However, you need a whole lot of "Suspension of Disbelief"

After a hiatus of over a decade Peter Falk returns as the dogged and persistent homicide detective Columbo of the LAPD. As usual he's got himself a suspect who thinks he's a cut or two above the hoi ploi.

Anthony Zerbe is our victim here and he's a magician in the tradition of Harry Houdini. And as history has taught us one of Houdini's sidelines was the exposure of psychics whom he thought were all a gang of frauds.

Zerbe knows that Anthony Andrews is a fraud and he's got some personal knowledge of that because they have some history together. Zerbe by the way is no saint either.

Zerbe is done in by one of his magician's props, a guillotine he uses in his act that proves to be all too real.

One thing about this episode, like in a few others Columbo doesn't have much of a case, he just hopes the suspect trips himself up. Andrews does in fact, but Peter Falk puts himself in harm's way to do it.

But of course he gets his man.

Although I am not a fanatic about Columbo, whenever I come across an episode while I'm channel surfing, I take it. The Columbo mysteries definitely beat the offerings of many other shows, even the Columbo entries that aren't as strong as others... which this one happens to be.

Let me make clear that I didn't hate or merely dislike this entry - I was to a significant degree entertained. But at the same time I saw some significant weaknesses. The most obvious one is the fact that this entry was designed to fit a two hour time slot, while the older episodes were made for a ninety minute time slot. While you might think that more Columbo would be great, for this particular mystery it is a problem. The setup takes far, far longer than usual; it takes a long time for Columbo to make his first appearance. And after Columbo starts to make his investigation, there are a few other places where the story seems unnecessarily padded out.

Also, there are some predictable touches here and there, though that may be because I know the hero so well by now, I have a good idea how he works.

But I'm glad I saw this entry despite its flaws. It's always nice to see this character, who is a little older but still a brilliant and interesting detective. Series fans should enjoy this entry, though people unfamiliar with Columbo should probably start with some of the older (and stronger) episodes first before watching this entry.

Without being absolutely outstanding, Columbo Goes to the Guillotine is a solid and nice return for the great detective. The second half does drag though, and some scenes go on for too long, but other than that it is a very good episode, helped primarily by a good script and a clever plot with some interesting magic tricks. The locations and photography as per usual are striking, and the music is good as well. The acting isn't outstanding but it is still good. Peter Falk I have no problem with, while Anthony Andrews gives a good turn as well, while the supporting cast while not as good are solid. Overall, it is a nice return for Columbo, with an 8/10. Bethany Cox

Not bad as a TV movie and pretty much in tune with the classical Columbo of 70s. But this one has a few annoying defects, I must say.

1. Was that long setup really necessary? Couldn't we simply learn of the shared past of the duo and how the younger one was scamming the military in 10 minutes instead of the 20 or 30 that began to look like a lifetime? I'm all for long openings, but as long as they serve their purpose perfectly. There was some dead weight on the first act of this one. (catch that pun!)

2. How exactly did Columbo "catch" the killer this time? I mean, okay, he somewhat confessed but... Was there really any hard evidence? Or even a soft one? The ending suggested that Columbo was gonna book him for the attempted murder against himself only. How will THAT hold in court?!? No witnesses, nothing solid... This killer will walk! And... Given he is okay with murdering Columbo (not the crime in investigation, but another one that is, by the way) WHY wouldn't he do it right now, given the lieutenant is all by himself, totally unprotected against a much younger and taller man?

3. The trick done during the test... Are military officials so dumb they would fall for it? Not bad, but the overcomplication with the process had to be a giveaway for the people funding that paranormal study. Given Columbo solved it thanks to help from a 13 year old kid, especially.

4. I get the entertainment value with the name "Columbo Goes to the Guillotine" and the suspense of seeing our beloved detective in that position. But, FFS, please, NO! This is SO FAR from being credible! Has Columbo gone INSANE? Will he really be risking his own life? Gambling on which side the killer would place the collar piece? "Safe" will behead him, the other side will be harmless. That's Russian roulette! What if the guy WAS guilty BUT didn't want to behead Columbo? I mean... Really, really dumb!... This could happen only if Columbo was tired of his wife and life and willing to actually commit suicide by the hands of a murderer. I could be on board with that final scene if we were shown that the collar piece was fixed in such a way that Columbo would be at no risk, and that other officially assigned people could be there to catch the confession of the killer, but no... You can't end a Columbo episode so abruptly, detached from the very basics of his modus operandi and certain legislative facts.

I won't say it's bad TV overall, but it certainly is some missed chance in comparison to that other, classical episode involving magic, guest starring Jack Cassidy.