Hand of Death Part 25 - Jackson's Back

From reviews and comments I have read about this film I see that not many people rate it. I however beg to differ. This a fantastic film that puts a new light on the normally one dimensional stalk and slash killer. Get your mates round, buy some beer and prepare yourself for something fresh.

The gore is spectacular and Jackson even shows his face. Think Braindead or Bad Taste or even the Troma movies. They are in no way meant to be taken seriously but to this day still rank up there as some of the finest horror movies ever made. I recommend this highly, although watch it with your tongue firmly in your cheek.

In Germany this flick is available uncut on the XT label. But this flick lays in the public domain so I guess it just will be a VHS rip. It's quit a rare flick to watch. And many people will stop watching this because after some nasty killings this flick turns into a romantic flick until the final were gore galore.

This was the first film of director Anders Palm, but he surely knew how to film this. It reminded me a bit of the way Peter Jackson filmed his early gore flicks. The biggest name in this flick will be Adrian Hough who made it into Underworld Evolution (2006), X-men The Last Stand (2006) and Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes (2011) followed by Gregory Cox seen in X-men First Class (2011). The female lead was by Fiona Evans who only did one flick.

the beginning of this flick starts really gory with a face being teared apart up to the skull, but even that wasn't enough, seeing is believing. The killings go further until Jackson (Gregory Cox) ran into Shelly (Fiona Evans). From there this flick really falls down into a pure romantic flick. And it goes on and on for almost up to the end of this flick. In between Jackson ran into situations he couldn't understand why people do react towards him. I was thinking, what is the fuss about but you really have to sit through the romantic shite until the final.

Cheap flick with excellent effects that are really gory. It also has some man and female nudity. Surely one to pick up, uncut of course.

Gore 3/5 Nudity 1/5 Effects 4/5 Story 3/5 Comedy 0/5

My review was written in March 1989 after watching the movie on Academy video cassette.

This British horror spoof (going direct to video Stateside) is on target with its script's satirical barbs, but is not well realized as a feature. Gore content of unrated version marks it for a specialty audience.

Filmmakers Anders Palm and Mark Cutforth are poking fun at the endless string of imitative Yank shriekers such as "Friday the 13th" and "Halloween" series that substitute cliches for creativity.

Antihero Gregory Cox wear a Jason-esque goalie's mask and is given to slaughtering people in gruesome fashion until he meets kindly but kinky blind girl Fiona Evans. She befriends him and beds him, even getting him to remove his mask, revealing a hideously deformed (but subpar makeup effects) face.

In striving for black humor, pic gets bogged down in some silliness, tastelessness and pretentious writing. Reflexive material as folks recognize he hero "from his movies" is overdone, climaxing with him aghast at a theater marquee hawking the 26th film in the series. Yucky gore doesn't sit well with what is basically an intellectual exercise.

Jackson (Gregory Cox) is a disfigured maniac genetically driven to mutilate and kill; misunderstood and feared, he hides his ugly face behind a hockey mask. But Jackson also has a sensitive side to his nature, one that he is finally able to express when he meets blind beauty Shelly (Fiona Evans) during one of his massacres. Unable to see his hideous features, Shelly is drawn to Jackson's existential torment, and the two begin a tender love affair. But for how long can Jackson suppress his urge to kill?

Unmasked Pt 25 veers so wildly between brutal violence, emotional drama, and seemingly humorous moments that the true intent of director Anders Palm is never absolute: is the monster's inner turmoil supposed to be satirical or serious? Are we supposed to be amused or horrified? The plot alludes to the classic monster movies of the Universal era as well as spoofing contemporary slashers, but to what avail? Try as I might, I just couldn't figure it all out; I even considered the possibility of the schizophrenic approach having been devised to reflect the duality of Jackson's personality, but this hypothesis seemed unlikely, crap movie-making being a far more plausible reason.

Eventually, I gave up with the wild conjecture to try and explain the madness I was seeing, and ended up simply enjoying the whole thing for the incredible WTF factor, the gratuitous nudity, the dreadful late 80s London fashion disasters, and the outrageous and inventive gore, of which there is plenty, and most of which is surprisingly well handled. When all else confuses, a lampstand through the skull will always make me smile.

I rented this movie a while ago and I really liked it. To my surprise I saw a copy for sale and bought yesterday. Just watched it and well, I was super disappointed. It was totally cut missing most of the gore, male/female frontal nudity and violence. I was so mad.

+Stay away from the box that says rated R+

Anyway, the movie is funny and you gotta love the clothes these people wear. The accents somethings get to you, but other than that it is a lot of fun to watch.

This is sort of a Friday the 13th comedy. The killer even wears a hockey mask!