Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuOrson Welles and Elizabeth Taylor compassionately narrate this harrowing documentary about Jewish persecution in Nazi Germany, which soon turned into a notoriously industrious plan to wipe t... Alles lesenOrson Welles and Elizabeth Taylor compassionately narrate this harrowing documentary about Jewish persecution in Nazi Germany, which soon turned into a notoriously industrious plan to wipe them from existence.Orson Welles and Elizabeth Taylor compassionately narrate this harrowing documentary about Jewish persecution in Nazi Germany, which soon turned into a notoriously industrious plan to wipe them from existence.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- 1 Oscar gewonnen
- 1 wins total
Elizabeth Taylor
- Narrator
- (Synchronisation)
Orson Welles
- Narrator
- (Synchronisation)
Neville Chamberlain
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Winston Churchill
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Dwight D. Eisenhower
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Joseph Goebbels
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
- (as Josef Goebbels)
Hermann Göring
- Self - at Nuremberg Trials
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Rudolf Hess
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Heinrich Himmler
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Adolf Hitler
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Ralph Metcalfe
- Self - in 100m Final at the 1936 Olympics
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Martinus Osendarp
- Self - in 100m Final at the 1936 Olympics
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Jesse Owens
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Pope Pius XII
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
- (as The Pope)
Franklin D. Roosevelt
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
- (as Franklin Delano Roosevelt)
Joachim von Ribbentrop
- Self - at Nuremberg Trials
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Erich Borchmeyer
- Self - in 100m Final at the 1936 Olympics
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Forget the the other numerous Holocaust documentaries. This is the definitive account of the atrocities of Nazi Germany, no reenactment..just fact after fact from records of those despicable times ..backed by photos and film ..kudos to Elizabeth Taylor and Orson Wells for their heartfelt narration....upsetting to watch but has to be seen.
A documentary about the 'Final solution' to the Jewish people in Europe in the early 20th Century. Filled with period black and white photos of mass graves, death camps, historical figures and period film, this film really captures the times - definitely not the brightest time for the Jewish people but as this film shows, there is always hope. Recommended for anyone wanting to know about the holocaust - something that did happen and should not be forgotten in this new millennium.
If only one documentary film of the holocaust should be preserved, this is probably it. Riveting in its content, rich in its emotion, and outstanding in its technique, this film flirts with greatness. Indeed, the moving narration provided by both Elizabeth Taylor and Orson Welles is among the most impassioned, most heartfelt, in cinematic history.
Alas, despite its overall excellence, the film must be "marked down" because of its apparent disregard for internal consistency. Don't get me wrong - everything (and more) of what it recounts is factually true. And all of the documentary evidence it presents is as real as the screen you're looking at. No, what bothered me was the tendency over and over again for the filmmaker to use photographic material inaccurately. So, for example, to help paint the picture of the Holocaust on the Eastern Front, we are presented with multiple black and white photographs of hangings. The trouble is that many of the photos were neither of Jews nor of the Holocaust. They were of partisans and commissars (also hunted and slaughtered by the Nazis). Likewise, while the narration describes an 'aktion' in Lithuania, the photos we see are from assaults on Jewish women in Lvov. I could go on, but think you get the idea.
Again, please don't misinterpret me. I am not at all challenging the general veracity of the film nor the importance of its message. My quarrel is, simply, that too many of the illustrations used to complement the narrative are out of place and inaccurate. By and large, this probably makes little difference to things overall (whether someone was murdered in 1943 or 1944, and whether by hanging or by a bullet to the back of the neck, is irrelevant in the total enormity of the Holocaust). However, given the reality of revisionists and deniers, the last thing one would want to do, especially when making a film that in some sense "proves" the Holocaust, is to give the disbelievers any ammunition for their perverted cause. Frankly, I'm distressed by such careless selection and use of photos. I fear that this could cost the film credibility - credibility in the eyes of those who most need to have them opened.
Alas, despite its overall excellence, the film must be "marked down" because of its apparent disregard for internal consistency. Don't get me wrong - everything (and more) of what it recounts is factually true. And all of the documentary evidence it presents is as real as the screen you're looking at. No, what bothered me was the tendency over and over again for the filmmaker to use photographic material inaccurately. So, for example, to help paint the picture of the Holocaust on the Eastern Front, we are presented with multiple black and white photographs of hangings. The trouble is that many of the photos were neither of Jews nor of the Holocaust. They were of partisans and commissars (also hunted and slaughtered by the Nazis). Likewise, while the narration describes an 'aktion' in Lithuania, the photos we see are from assaults on Jewish women in Lvov. I could go on, but think you get the idea.
Again, please don't misinterpret me. I am not at all challenging the general veracity of the film nor the importance of its message. My quarrel is, simply, that too many of the illustrations used to complement the narrative are out of place and inaccurate. By and large, this probably makes little difference to things overall (whether someone was murdered in 1943 or 1944, and whether by hanging or by a bullet to the back of the neck, is irrelevant in the total enormity of the Holocaust). However, given the reality of revisionists and deniers, the last thing one would want to do, especially when making a film that in some sense "proves" the Holocaust, is to give the disbelievers any ammunition for their perverted cause. Frankly, I'm distressed by such careless selection and use of photos. I fear that this could cost the film credibility - credibility in the eyes of those who most need to have them opened.
10Sig
'Genocide' is one of the finest of many documents on the Holocaust. It richly deserves the Academy Award and all the other accolades it has received.
This is an intense documentary of the extermination of the Jewish people in the Holocaust, with much archival footage. The scenes are often gripping and horrifying in their veracity, but it is a must see for any student of the Holocaust. There is a reference close to the end of a letter from 93 virgins requesting the kaddish for them in the future - this particular letter was proved later to be a hoax (http://www.hashkafah.com) Regardless, it is an excellent documentary even with the often melodramatic voice of Elizabeth Taylor. Most Holocaust literature attempts to play down such drama because the reality simply cannot be conveyed. I will use this in film class.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesElizabeth Taylor was so upset by the experience of narrating this film, she said it gave her nightmares. She cried so much during the first recording session, she required an extra day to complete her narration.
- VerbindungenFeatured in The 54th Annual Academy Awards (1982)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Genocide?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 3.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen