IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,3/10
4458
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuWith the aid of his companions, a man seeks to defeat his evil brother who has taken a nun hostage.With the aid of his companions, a man seeks to defeat his evil brother who has taken a nun hostage.With the aid of his companions, a man seeks to defeat his evil brother who has taken a nun hostage.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
William Morgan Sheppard
- Ranulf
- (as Morgan Sheppard)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I am aware that this film has been badly received by most reviewers, but I cannot get myself to agree. It may be corny, cheesy, gimmicky, but for me, all the gimmicks worked. I loved the matte paintings, which most sfx connoisseurs scoff at. I loved the stiff acting, and melodramatic cornball dialogue, and the shallow Tolkienesque ambiance. I adored Jack Palance's ham acting as the villain. I loved the Elf, and the Dwarf, and the Giant, and the Witch. I loved the music (and did not notice anything particularly "70s" about it, but perhaps that was because I grew up in that era). What I loved most about it was an aspect that another commentator complained about: its incompleteness. That other commentator (from IMDb) complained that he felt like he was watching part 2 of a three-act play. Well, that's a good thing, isn't it? What is the point of immersing oneself in a fantasy world if it is going to be so small it can contain itself in a single film. The implication that I was watching a small part of a much greater story was what gave this film its charm. The cryptic references to things beyond its borders made the world created seem far vaster than it was, and helped the matte paintings seem to come to life.
-- NystulC
-- NystulC
Similar to the reputation Showgirls has received in the "its so bad its good" category, upon repeated viewing of this film you can only just marvel on how crap this film is. The acting is diabolical, the story is terrible and the special effects were done by the local primary school.
It is because it suffers from almost every cinematic angel it becomes entertaining to watch.
Kids will love it and adults will laugh at the semi-serious attempt in making a fantasy film with elves, dwarfs, giants (or rather the very large man from the carry on films) and a witch whose special powers include fire balls that look remarkably like ping pong balls painted in luminous colours.
It is because it suffers from almost every cinematic angel it becomes entertaining to watch.
Kids will love it and adults will laugh at the semi-serious attempt in making a fantasy film with elves, dwarfs, giants (or rather the very large man from the carry on films) and a witch whose special powers include fire balls that look remarkably like ping pong balls painted in luminous colours.
Voltan is a "bad man" who has sold his soul to the dark forces in exchange for power. With Voltan having killed his father, the only one that may be able to stop him is his own brother Hawk (aka "The Slayer"). The Dark Lord knows this and conspires to draw Hawk into a final battle and thus defeat him. To achieve this Voltan kidnaps a nun and demands a ransom bringing Hawk out to her aid. On his way to his battle with Voltan, Hawk meets with a small, varied group of warriors to help him in his quest.
This film takes us back to a dark time, a time of evil and madness; a time where great changes were occurring as the 1970's turned into the 1980's. It is in this time of great evil that Hawk the Slayer was thrust upon cinema audiences who endured great suffering as a result. Or maybe they didn't maybe audiences then were a lot less fussy and ate this up but somehow I doubt it. The plot is a simple quest with the usual stuff with a group of men being formed to fight the forces of evil. So far so dull and even those who love this sort of stuff will struggle to care about the very basic plot. Attempts to create relationships and character tensions fall flat at every turn and what should have driven the bigger story just doesn't work.
Of course it doesn't help that the delivery is so very tacky. The synthesised music doesn't help as disco isn't really the music one imagines hearing when watching a swords & sorcery film; it is funny rather than atmospheric. The costumes are OK but the sets are basic and the crew are always on hand with lots of dry ice to help make it look like the forest sets have been recently hosting a rock concert. The cats are rubbish and generally wooden, although my pick of the crap goes to Palance's cry of remorse at the death of his son it is the least emotional cry I think I've ever heard. Of course John Terry is just as bad, with his wooden delivery and regular slow motion horse riding. Bresslaw, Charleson, O'Farrell are all just as poor and it is hard at times to see the actors for the trees. Marcel directs without an idea of what he is trying to achieve at times he is making a serious epic, others a disco adventure and then others a TV serial. The limits of the budget are obvious but not even that excuses the use of party silly string as a weapon and various other poor effect choices.
Overall then this is best summed up by the old cliché "so bad it is good" although that actually isn't really true in this case for the majority of viewers. The plot is obvious and lacking much in the way of effort or imagination. The acting is wooden and the effects are cheap while director Marcel shows us why the majority of his career since has been in UK television rather than cinema.
This film takes us back to a dark time, a time of evil and madness; a time where great changes were occurring as the 1970's turned into the 1980's. It is in this time of great evil that Hawk the Slayer was thrust upon cinema audiences who endured great suffering as a result. Or maybe they didn't maybe audiences then were a lot less fussy and ate this up but somehow I doubt it. The plot is a simple quest with the usual stuff with a group of men being formed to fight the forces of evil. So far so dull and even those who love this sort of stuff will struggle to care about the very basic plot. Attempts to create relationships and character tensions fall flat at every turn and what should have driven the bigger story just doesn't work.
Of course it doesn't help that the delivery is so very tacky. The synthesised music doesn't help as disco isn't really the music one imagines hearing when watching a swords & sorcery film; it is funny rather than atmospheric. The costumes are OK but the sets are basic and the crew are always on hand with lots of dry ice to help make it look like the forest sets have been recently hosting a rock concert. The cats are rubbish and generally wooden, although my pick of the crap goes to Palance's cry of remorse at the death of his son it is the least emotional cry I think I've ever heard. Of course John Terry is just as bad, with his wooden delivery and regular slow motion horse riding. Bresslaw, Charleson, O'Farrell are all just as poor and it is hard at times to see the actors for the trees. Marcel directs without an idea of what he is trying to achieve at times he is making a serious epic, others a disco adventure and then others a TV serial. The limits of the budget are obvious but not even that excuses the use of party silly string as a weapon and various other poor effect choices.
Overall then this is best summed up by the old cliché "so bad it is good" although that actually isn't really true in this case for the majority of viewers. The plot is obvious and lacking much in the way of effort or imagination. The acting is wooden and the effects are cheap while director Marcel shows us why the majority of his career since has been in UK television rather than cinema.
I need the music sound track for this movie but I don't know where to look for it, Can anyone help?
The sets are awful, the acting abysmal.John Terry looks petulant. I still enjoyed it, though. It is a good movie to watch, wasted, with your friends yelling at the TV. I look at this film and I can't think what caused these actors to be in it, it can't have gotten them that much money but I suppose there was a sort of notoriety. The music is great, though, cheesy and inspirational. I need it for when I'm doing heroic deeds and complicated tasks. It would be good to have to play when I enter a room or come running up the street.
I like Voltan but he does strike me as phenomenally stupid. He is terminally dedicated to EVIL. He doesn't seem to want things of do anything that isn't in the cause of EVIL. I would of thought his character would like power or perhaps just to survive.
They all have a great way with words, either whispering lines or shouting them. I enjoyed the emotional characterisation from John Terry. He almost acted.
The sets are awful, the acting abysmal.John Terry looks petulant. I still enjoyed it, though. It is a good movie to watch, wasted, with your friends yelling at the TV. I look at this film and I can't think what caused these actors to be in it, it can't have gotten them that much money but I suppose there was a sort of notoriety. The music is great, though, cheesy and inspirational. I need it for when I'm doing heroic deeds and complicated tasks. It would be good to have to play when I enter a room or come running up the street.
I like Voltan but he does strike me as phenomenally stupid. He is terminally dedicated to EVIL. He doesn't seem to want things of do anything that isn't in the cause of EVIL. I would of thought his character would like power or perhaps just to survive.
They all have a great way with words, either whispering lines or shouting them. I enjoyed the emotional characterisation from John Terry. He almost acted.
This movie is a rare exception. After reading a lot of the reviews, I would have to say I agree with most of them. Yes, it does have bad acting, bad special effects, and bad directing but there is something about it (I can't quite put my finger on it) that makes it great!
I watch this movie every time I know it is going to be on. I guess I like what it tried to do more than what it actually did. I would honestly like to see a sequel (although too late now) done to this. They hinted toward it at the end but I guess it never came to fruition.
In summary, I would recommend seeing this movie. A rare film that is both great and bad at the same time.
I watch this movie every time I know it is going to be on. I guess I like what it tried to do more than what it actually did. I would honestly like to see a sequel (although too late now) done to this. They hinted toward it at the end but I guess it never came to fruition.
In summary, I would recommend seeing this movie. A rare film that is both great and bad at the same time.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesJack Palance was injured in a fight scene when John Terry's sword punctured his body. Palance didn't stop, and completed the take. Afterward, director Terry Marcel went over to see if Palance was all right. Palance cast any concerns aside, and continued with the shoot.
- PatzerWhen Hawk the Slayer receives the magic sword from his father, his eyes are looking straight ahead in the close-ups and not at the blade on the ground.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Clapper Board: Hawk the Slayer (1981)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Hawk the Slayer?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Hawk the Slayer
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen