[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Nightmare 2 - Die Rache

Originaltitel: A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge
  • 1985
  • 16
  • 1 Std. 27 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,5/10
82.417
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Nightmare 2 - Die Rache (1985)
Home Video Trailer from New Line Home Entertainment
trailer wiedergeben1:29
1 Video
99+ Fotos
Body HorrorSlasher HorrorSupernatural HorrorTeen HorrorHorror

Ein Teenager wird in seinen Träumen vom verstorbenen Kindermörder Freddy Krueger verfolgt, der ihn besitzen will, um seine Herrschaft des Terrors in der realen Welt fortzusetzen.Ein Teenager wird in seinen Träumen vom verstorbenen Kindermörder Freddy Krueger verfolgt, der ihn besitzen will, um seine Herrschaft des Terrors in der realen Welt fortzusetzen.Ein Teenager wird in seinen Träumen vom verstorbenen Kindermörder Freddy Krueger verfolgt, der ihn besitzen will, um seine Herrschaft des Terrors in der realen Welt fortzusetzen.

  • Regie
    • Jack Sholder
  • Drehbuch
    • David Chaskin
    • Wes Craven
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Robert Englund
    • Mark Patton
    • Kim Myers
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    5,5/10
    82.417
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Jack Sholder
    • Drehbuch
      • David Chaskin
      • Wes Craven
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Robert Englund
      • Mark Patton
      • Kim Myers
    • 471Benutzerrezensionen
    • 158Kritische Rezensionen
    • 43Metascore
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 2 Nominierungen insgesamt

    Videos1

    A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddys Revenge
    Trailer 1:29
    A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddys Revenge

    Fotos253

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 247
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung27

    Ändern
    Robert Englund
    Robert Englund
    • Freddy Krueger
    Mark Patton
    Mark Patton
    • Jesse Walsh
    Kim Myers
    Kim Myers
    • Lisa Webber
    Robert Rusler
    Robert Rusler
    • Ron Grady
    Clu Gulager
    Clu Gulager
    • Mr. Walsh
    Hope Lange
    Hope Lange
    • Mrs. Walsh
    Marshall Bell
    Marshall Bell
    • Coach Schneider
    Melinda O. Fee
    Melinda O. Fee
    • Mrs. Webber
    Tom McFadden
    • Mr. Webber
    • (as Thom McFadden)
    Sydney Walsh
    Sydney Walsh
    • Kerry
    Edward Blackoff
    • Biology Teacher
    Christie Clark
    Christie Clark
    • Angela Walsh
    Lyman Ward
    Lyman Ward
    • Mr. Grady
    Donna Bruce
    • Mrs. Grady
    Hart Sprager
    • Teacher
    Allison Barron
    • Girl on Bus
    JoAnn Willette
    JoAnn Willette
    • Girl on Bus
    Steve Eastin
    Steve Eastin
    • Policeman
    • Regie
      • Jack Sholder
    • Drehbuch
      • David Chaskin
      • Wes Craven
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen471

    5,582.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    7Falconeer

    Weird, Creepy Film...

    This has got to be the strangest horror sequel of all time, next to "Exorcist II: The Heretic," which was another brave risk that failed commercially due to it's weirdness and different tone. But the terms "weird and creepy" are not really an insult when describing a horror film. Those dark, sexual overtones in this movie lent it a haunting and sinister feel, and a truly nightmarish tone. I don't think audiences in 1985 were ready for something like this, but no matter; the reason to see this film is for the appearance of Robert Englund as the burnt child killer, Fred Kruger, and before this character was made into a joke in later films, this guy had to be the most horrifying monster of all time. And he is intensely scary in this film, which succeeds in preserving the dark tone of the original. Something the first two films managed to succeed in doing, was making scenes filmed in the bright sunlight, seem as scary and menacing as the night scenes with all the fog and shadows. Of course that locker room scene with the pervy coach was filmed at night, and I found that to be extremely unsettling, and like nothing else I had seen in other movies of the genre. Another good thing about this sequel is how it looks like the first film, with it's sets and lighting and camera work. That is the connection that it needed to connect to the first one, and the inclusion of Nancy's diary was a great way to bring her character into the new movie. The four friends in the sequel brought to mind the dynamics of the original, with the four friends dealing with the menace of Fred Kruger. I also thought the idea of Kruger possessing the body of the main character in order to be able to kill in the real world, was pretty intense. This one is different, and will not please some of the Elm Street fanbase, but the fact that Fred Kruger has never been more creepy and terrifying than in THIS movie, should make it a major selling point for "Freddy's Revenge..."
    5TheLittleSongbird

    This revenge is more damp than it is terrifying

    The original 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' is still to me one of the scariest and best horror films there is, as well as a truly great film in its own right and introduced us to one of the genre's most iconic villains in Freddy Krueger. It is always difficult to do a sequel that lives up to a film as good as 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' let alone one to be on the same level.

    'A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge' is not to me the dreadful film as reputed, but, while its attempts to do something different is admirable, it should have been much better than it turned out to be. It is very difficult to not feel disappointed when you inevitably compare 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' to its first sequel and find that the drop in quality is so significant and hard to ignore. Whether 'Freddy's Revenge' is the worst of the series is debatable, to me and many others it is one of the weaker ones.

    'Freddy's Revenge' is not a complete waste of time. It starts off very promisingly, with the bus scene is thrillingly unsettling. Easily the film's scariest moment and the scene one remembers the most. Robert Englund is still very freaky and shows why Freddy is so iconic as a villain, he may not be quite as terrifying but the material isn't as strong here and he is still highly effective.

    It's not a bad-looking film, there is a slickness to it and there are some nightmarish effects. There are some eerie moments, though none of the rest of the film lives up to the bus scene, and some amusing dark humour. The music is suitably haunting.

    However, there are also a fair share of problems. The scares don't come enough, and while there are effective ones there are also just as many that are perfunctory and pretty tame by 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' series standards. Credit is due for trying to do something different and there are parts that do intrigue. A tighter pace and less pedestrian direction would have made the execution better, as well as trying to do less and focus more on the quality of the scares and how the story is told.

    Jesse is such a dull damp squib of a character who lacks a quick-thinking or logical brain let alone any kind of presence. The one-note expressionless acting of Mark Patton accentuates this. The rest of the cast are nowhere near as bad, but when it comes to the acting the only one to properly rise above the material is Englund. Lastly, the ending is a slap in the face and really undoes Freddy's character, he would never do what he does at the end and it doesn't make sense for him to do it.

    Overall, not that bad but could have been much better. 5/10 Bethany Cox
    5mentalcritic

    At least it had the guts to be a bit different...

    Now that Nightmare is up to seven or eight sequels, while Friday The 13th is up to ten (and counting), it must be hard to look back on the days when horror films tried to be vaguely original or even different. With all the Screams and I Know What Your Breasts Did Last Summers, making Freddy's Revenge in these "enlightened" days would be just about impossible.

    But culture, and particularly youth culture, in the 1980s was considerably different, certainly far less conservative and anti-creative. In those days, The Cure were a big thing, and even the most basic of pop sludge was far more creative than what we have today. Not to mention that it was far easier to make dodgy films and get them released theatrically.

    A Nightmare On Elm Street Part 2 picks up five years after the original, although it was a rush-job filmed less than a year after said original was out of the theatre. The film company, at that time the independent startup known as New Line, saw a quick and easy meal ticket that only required them to convince Robert Englund to submerge himself in what looks like three tons of multi-coloured latex. So the idea of a decent script, decent actors, or decent photography, went right out the window.

    Which is kind of sad, really, when you consider that this is the only Freddy film in which an original premise is used. You might want to skip the rest of this paragraph if you have yet to see it. In it, a young man (whose behaviour is consistent with repressed homosexuality, in one of those hilarious plot coincidences) has just moved into the house from which Nancy originally dealt with Freddy. With the help of the sort of girlfriend any other male (and even some females) of this age would want to climb atop of at every opportunity, our hero attempts to fight off Freddy (and his own gayness), which in turn creates some very interesting plot devices. The moment when our heroine is holding up a carving knife at Freddy, who gives her a graphic and terrifying demonstration of the fact that she'll kill her (confused) lover if she kills Freddy, could have been one of the most horrific moments in the entire series. I am not quite convinced that it isn't, given that the only other episode in the series that was vaugely adult after this point was Part 3.

    Unfortunately, the actors hired for these roles cannot act their way out of a wet paper bag. The only cast member with acting skills that even compare to Robert Englund's would be Marshall Bell. I am convinced that his turn here as the (gay) gym teacher was what got him hired to be in Total Recall and StarShip Troopers. Mark Patton (no relation to the Mike Patton who leads Mr. Bungle or the Mike Patton who was an early cast member in You Can't Do That On Television) is terrible - his only talent, as such, is to scream like a seventy-year-old woman. The actors who play his family look as if they belong on a cheap knock-off of Family Ties. The best actor in the whole piece was the budgie, who seemed to decide he would rather explode than be in this idiotic film a second longer.

    When all is said and done, Robert Louis Stevenson said it much better in The Frightening Tale Of Doctor Jekyll And Mister Hyde (although there are no shortage of adaptations to that work which suck more than this). Normally, I would give this effort a three out of ten, but it gets two bonus points because it is like no other episode in the Nightmare canon, and that is a damned good thing when you put it alongside episodes four through seven.
    7Captain_Couth

    Freddy's back to terrorize a confused teenage boy!

    Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2 (1985) was the second film in the Freddy Krueger series. This time his main target is the son of a man who just but the Elm Street house. Freddy preys on this sexually confused kid and forces him to do his bidding and uses him to serve his twisted needs. Can poor Jesse over come the strong willpower of Freddy? Will he be able to discover his true self? Watch and find out, you'll be surprised! Strange stuff.

    What I liked about this film was the filmmakers tried to do something different, and it almost killed the series. The plot and storyline was too complex and byzantine for you average horror film. Much of the film's hidden context and meaning would go over the heads of most horror film fans. If Sigmund Freud were alive today he would've had a field day trying to figure out this one. Sadly underrated and unfairly neglected..

    Strongly recommended
    5Smells_Like_Cheese

    Pretty sad

    A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge, the second installment in the Nightmare on Elm Street series and probably the worst in the series. I was lucky enough to get the boxed DVD set of A Nightmare on Elm Street series and I got to see all the sequels. I think this is the sequel that I disliked the most, just because it didn't at all add up to what the first film was. It was like watching a cheesy teenager show with a twist of Nightmare on Elm Street. The kid who's the new victim, Jesse, is like Kevin Bacon's character in Footloose where he's not excepted by anyone, now just mix Footloose with Nightmare on Elm Street and you've got A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge. The story had potential, but it just failed.

    Jesse is the new kid in town and he has moved into Nancy Thomson's old house. Not too soon is he having the same horrific nightmares that Nancy was having about Freddy Krueger. Jesse confides in his neighbor/crush, Lisa, she doesn't believe him until she starts having the nightmares herself. She researches Freddy and finds out that he is after Jesse's body and wants to take it over. But she may be too late when he does enter Jesse's body and is after her and all the rest of the kids at Jesse's high school.

    A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge isn't bad, just compared to the series, yeah, it's the worst in that category. The story had something, but it wasn't delivered well. But just think about what A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge was compared too with it's first film that was an ultimate classic. So maybe that's why we have such a problem with the film. But I would recommend it if you wanna see the sequels, but if you're watching it without knowing the first story, I don't think you'll enjoy it.

    5/10

    Mehr wie diese

    Nightmare 3 - Freddy lebt
    6,7
    Nightmare 3 - Freddy lebt
    Nightmare on Elm Street 4
    5,6
    Nightmare on Elm Street 4
    Nightmare on Elm Street 5 - Das Trauma
    5,0
    Nightmare on Elm Street 5 - Das Trauma
    Nightmare - Mörderische Träume
    7,4
    Nightmare - Mörderische Träume
    Freddy's New Nightmare
    6,4
    Freddy's New Nightmare
    A Nightmare on Elm Street 6: Freddy's Finale
    4,7
    A Nightmare on Elm Street 6: Freddy's Finale
    Freddy vs. Jason
    5,7
    Freddy vs. Jason
    A Nightmare on Elm Street
    5,2
    A Nightmare on Elm Street
    Freitag, der 13. Teil 4 - Das letzte Kapitel
    6,0
    Freitag, der 13. Teil 4 - Das letzte Kapitel
    Und wieder ist Freitag der 13.
    5,6
    Und wieder ist Freitag der 13.
    Freitag, der 13. - Jason kehrt zurück
    6,1
    Freitag, der 13. - Jason kehrt zurück
    Freitag, der 13. Teil 6 - Jason lebt
    6,0
    Freitag, der 13. Teil 6 - Jason lebt

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      New Line Cinema originally didn't ask Robert Englund to return as Freddy Krueger and refused to give him a pay raise. A stuntman was cast as Freddy at the start of production. After two weeks of filming, Robert Shaye realized this was a terrible lapse in judgment, fired the stuntman, hired Englund, and met his demands.
    • Patzer
      There is an instance in which the same scene is used twice: after the gym fight when Grady and Jesse are holding the push-ups pose in the field, as punishment (at around 10 mins). This is the same scene used for when Jesse insults Schneider in the locker room (at around 28 minutes). The same people pass behind the fence.
    • Zitate

      [the kid approaches Freddy Krueger around the pool, standing up for the other frightened kids]

      Do-Gooder: [holding his hands up, walking to Freddy] Just tell us what you want, all right? I'm here to help you.

      Freddy Krueger: Help yourself, fucker!

      [as Freddy slices his shoulder and throws him against the flaming barbecue pit]

    • Alternative Versionen
      The original Australian VHS release features only Christopher Young's main title playing over the end credits.
    • Verbindungen
      Featured in The Best of Stephen King's World of Horror (1986)
    • Soundtracks
      Terror In My Heart
      Written by Rick Shaffer

      Produced and Performed by The Reds

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ19

    • How long is A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 19. März 1987 (Westdeutschland)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Pesadilla en Elm Street 2: La venganza de Freddy
    • Drehorte
      • 1428 N. Genesee Avenue, Hollywood, Los Angeles, Kalifornien, USA(Jesse's House)
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • New Line Cinema
      • Heron Communications
      • Smart Egg Pictures
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Budget
      • 3.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
    • Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
      • 29.999.213 $
    • Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
      • 2.865.475 $
      • 3. Nov. 1985
    • Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
      • 29.999.213 $
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      1 Stunde 27 Minuten
    • Sound-Mix
      • Mono
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.85 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    Nightmare 2 - Die Rache (1985)
    Oberste Lücke
    What is the Japanese language plot outline for Nightmare 2 - Die Rache (1985)?
    Antwort
    • Weitere Lücken anzeigen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.