[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Achtung, Dinosaurier!

Originaltitel: Movers & Shakers
  • 1985
  • PG
  • 1 Std. 20 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,2/10
611
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Achtung, Dinosaurier! (1985)
Studio head promises his dying producer and mentor, to adapt a popular sex manual into a film, despite his better judgment. Unable to figure out how to turn the nonfiction book into a narrative movie, Mulholland enlists the services of a screenwriter of popular romantic films with a bad marriage, and volatile director Sid Spokane to help him create a movie.
trailer wiedergeben1:48
1 Video
18 Fotos
SatireKomödie

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuJoe Mulholland, Head of Production at a Hollywood studio, makes a rather fool-hardy promise to a dying friend. He undertakes to make a major movie using the title - if not the content - of a... Alles lesenJoe Mulholland, Head of Production at a Hollywood studio, makes a rather fool-hardy promise to a dying friend. He undertakes to make a major movie using the title - if not the content - of a best-selling sex manual "Love in Sex". Enlisting the help of depressed screenwriter Herb ... Alles lesenJoe Mulholland, Head of Production at a Hollywood studio, makes a rather fool-hardy promise to a dying friend. He undertakes to make a major movie using the title - if not the content - of a best-selling sex manual "Love in Sex". Enlisting the help of depressed screenwriter Herb Derman and rather off-centre director Sid Spokane to try and come up with an idea or two, ... Alles lesen

  • Regie
    • William Asher
  • Drehbuch
    • Charles Grodin
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Walter Matthau
    • Charles Grodin
    • Vincent Gardenia
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    4,2/10
    611
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • William Asher
    • Drehbuch
      • Charles Grodin
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Walter Matthau
      • Charles Grodin
      • Vincent Gardenia
    • 13Benutzerrezensionen
    • 4Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    Trailer
    Trailer 1:48
    Trailer

    Fotos17

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 11
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung31

    Ändern
    Walter Matthau
    Walter Matthau
    • Joe Mulholland
    Charles Grodin
    Charles Grodin
    • Herb Derman
    Vincent Gardenia
    Vincent Gardenia
    • Saul Gritz
    Tyne Daly
    Tyne Daly
    • Nancy Derman
    Bill Macy
    Bill Macy
    • Sid Spokane
    Gilda Radner
    Gilda Radner
    • Livia Machado
    Earl Boen
    Earl Boen
    • Marshall
    Michael Lerner
    Michael Lerner
    • Arnie
    Joe Mantell
    Joe Mantell
    • Larry
    William Prince
    William Prince
    • Louis Martin
    Nita Talbot
    Nita Talbot
    • Dorothy
    Sandy Ward
    Sandy Ward
    • Doctor
    Judah Katz
    Judah Katz
    • Freddie
    Peter Marc Jacobson
    • Robin
    • (as Peter Marc)
    Sam Anderson
    Sam Anderson
    • Ray Berg
    Frances Bay
    Frances Bay
    • Betty Gritz
    Luana Anders
    Luana Anders
    • Violette
    Gene Dynarski
    Gene Dynarski
    • Board Member
    • Regie
      • William Asher
    • Drehbuch
      • Charles Grodin
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen13

    4,2611
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    5theowinthrop

    A Strange Misfire Comedy.

    I am only giving this film a "5" out of respect for it's cast headed by Walter Matthau, Charles Grodin, Steve Martin, Bill Macy, Tyne Daly, Gilda Radner, Penny Marshall, and Vincent Gardenia. Otherwise it is a peculiar satire on Hollywood that never quite works.

    Walter Matthau works at a large studio, now run by William Prince. Matthau is a successful producer there, but his mentor was Gardenia, who was once a great producer. But Gardenia has been going downhill, both creatively and physically. He has wasted millions of dollars on a film about the prehistoric world, and has even set up a huge dinosaur from the film on the grounds of the studio (much to a fed up Prince's anger). But Gardenia is taken off all other projects. He is now dying, and Matthau goes to see him. Gardenia, on the death bed, forces Matthau to do a film on a book he has just bought: a sexual guidebook. Matthau says he will, knowing it is a ridiculous promise.

    After Gardenia's death Matthau takes a close look into the sex book. This is the most popular sex guide in America, but the point is brought out in the film that if one thinks of sex lightly, as a powerful explosion from the emotion of love, it is easy to show in film, on stage, on television, on radio, in novels and short stories, or in paintings and sculpture. But if the actual physical activities involved were to be studied in a film (not a pornography film, by the way), it becomes boring.

    Still Matthau tries. He consults with Macy, a fabled film director (involved in a torrid and complicated affair with Radner - it ends when they wound each other in a shoot out). Macy's approach is to remind us of all the great film lovers of the past (Bogart among them) and how "dependable" they were. Matthau talks to Grodin, a leading screenplay writer. Grodin can't see where the drama needed for the film will come in. Matthau is advised to see the last of the great silent film lovers, the "ageless" Martin (once a rival of Valentino). He keeps talking of decades old romantic moments - but all is for naught when Matthau and Grodin and Macy see Martin is now henpecked by his harridan wife (Marshall).

    As you can see the film certainly had great direction in the script, except that despite the energy of the cast it just never rose above the one point: that discussing the physical activity of sex on film is not going to make a good movie. Somehow the script dropped a somewhat promising element: that a desperate Matthau might start dropping away from what Gardenia wished and produced a film that was a sex comedy. But for that to have fully worked, Gardenia's wacko character would have had to be alive throughout the film, and he would have had to keep the sense of taking the credit for the success of Matthau's changing the production plan to save the project. That never happens.

    I think the film tried to be philosophical but never got beyond presenting the main argument. It was a poor choice to make. MOVERS & SHAKERS may never have been a promisingly great film, but it might have been an amusing one. It is not too amusing now. Definitely not worthy of it's cast's energies at all.
    1OtherDaryl

    Bottom Rung Grodin

    This aired on TCM last night, selected by guest programmer/star/screenwriter Charles Grodin. Classic? Hardly! He seems fairly proud of this pic, though, which allows an extremely talented cast to either overplay or underplay to agonizing effect. Director Asher (an Emmy winner for Bewitched) was better in the half hour television format. A complete waste of time. I think it's supposed to satirize the dying Hollywood studio system. It was movies like this that killed it. Pairing Bill Macy and Gilda Radner as a couple? Penny Marshall is credited and we hear her voice, but to my recollection only ever actually see her feet. Tyne Daly stands around with nothing substantive to do but be ticked off.
    4planktonrules

    Decent acting but a film that couldn't help but fail at the box office.

    "Movers & Shakers" is a film written by Charles Grodin and he also produced and starred in the movie. In many ways, it reminds me of "The Player", as it's a look at some of the insiders who run Hollywood. However, the film is no where nearly as clever or enjoyable at "The Player"...in fact, it seems to have little sense of direction as well.

    The story is about a film project whose pedigree is odd. On a friend's deathbed, Joe (Walter Matthau) promises to make a movie using the same title as a famous sex book! The rest of the story is about the process...where the producers, director and writer all hash out what the film will be. Sadly, apart from the title, there's really not much more to their film.

    Again and again, I kept hoping this movie would get better and funnier. It seemed like the folks who MADE the film thought it was clever....but it never translated to the audience and is therefore a directionless and mostly unfunny comedy with some good acting.
    6uptownmyrnafan

    Too Inside for Audiences ?

    i just got done watching this movie on TCM, & i found it very funny. i saw the listing with Matthau & Grodin, & i didn't even bother to read the synopsis. That was enough for me. The story about a studio that buys the title of a book, simply for the title -- not the subject of the book. the movie focuses on how the movie studios will focus group & committee an idea to death. (a la the TV series "Action"). the young studio hot-shot keeps complaining about the 'old' age of the people working on the project ('why him? what is he 50?'). typical of the youth obsession in Hollywood, & the discarding of people in their middle-ages. those with NO life experience who trash fine or even classic movies by doing flat & soulless remakes, by flat & soulless performers. or by making inane movies about TV shows just because they grew up on those shows. that's today's Hollywood : No Real Stars, No Real Personas. just flat soulless surgically enhanced hacks. Could anyone recognize an impression of any of todays so-called stars? (& no i don't mean their catch-phrases). where's the talent of a Bogey, Gable, Carey Grant, Bette Davis, or Myrna Loy. or of a Shirley MacLaine, Peter Sellers, Paul Newman, Jack Lemmon, or Matthau? they don't make talent like that anymore. before the movie Charles Grodin asked the question : "because of today's audiences having better knowledge of the Hollywood system, would the movie play better today than it did in 1985 ?" sadly based on the other reviews here it would appear that the answer is no. i gave it 6 stars. nothing special, just a good comedy that features two of the best at their craft : Matthau & Grodin.
    1aberlour36

    A Golden Turkey

    This is surely one of the worst movies ever made. A comedy without a single laugh. The stupidity of the script, blame Charles Grodin for the entire film, is amazing. Steve Martin's performance was low, even for him. In short, awful and without redeeming features.

    Mehr wie diese

    Ein Single Kommt Selten Allein
    6,2
    Ein Single Kommt Selten Allein
    Twilight Theatre
    6,7
    Twilight Theatre
    Club Sandwich
    4,0
    Club Sandwich
    Der Zufalls-Dad
    6,3
    Der Zufalls-Dad
    Tanz in den Wolken
    6,5
    Tanz in den Wolken
    The Venice Project
    5,5
    The Venice Project
    Solo für 2
    6,7
    Solo für 2
    Ene mene muh - und Präsident bist du
    4,2
    Ene mene muh - und Präsident bist du
    Der Couch-Trip
    5,8
    Der Couch-Trip
    Ein Kellner wie der Gast ihn liebt
    7,3
    Ein Kellner wie der Gast ihn liebt
    Another Nice Mess
    5,9
    Another Nice Mess
    Tote tragen keine Karos
    6,8
    Tote tragen keine Karos

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      Charles Grodin got some of his actors friends involved in trying to pitch the film. Himself, Steve Martin, Gilda Radner, Penny Marshall and Tyne Daly all agreed to work for the least amount of money the union allowed.did so without even reading the script. When the film was finally green-lit, Grodin received no salary for writing or producing the film, only the minimum for working five weeks as an actor: about five thousand dollars for two years of work (seven years in total since the inception of the project).
    • Patzer
      The huge prop dinosaur that is mounted on the lawn of the movie studio lot changes position in respect to nearby buildings several times throughout the film.
    • Verbindungen
      Featured in At the Movies: Secret Admirer/The Goonies/Prizzi's Honor/Movers and Shakers (1985)
    • Soundtracks
      Can't We Go Home Again
      Words and Music by Mitzie Welch and Ken Welch

      Performed by Stephen Bishop

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ15

    • How long is Movers & Shakers?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 31. März 1988 (Italien)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Offizieller Standort
      • MGM
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Movers & Shakers
    • Drehorte
      • Kalifornien, USA(Location.)
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • Asher-Grodin Productions
      • United Artists
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
      • 372.438 $
    • Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
      • 9.580 $
      • 5. Mai 1985
    • Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
      • 372.438 $
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 20 Min.(80 min)
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Mono
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.85 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.