IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,8/10
6627
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Dudley Moore und Eddie Murphy sind die Stars dieses Hightech-Abenteuers, das die moderne Kriegsführung ein paar hundert Jahre zurückwirft.Dudley Moore und Eddie Murphy sind die Stars dieses Hightech-Abenteuers, das die moderne Kriegsführung ein paar hundert Jahre zurückwirft.Dudley Moore und Eddie Murphy sind die Stars dieses Hightech-Abenteuers, das die moderne Kriegsführung ein paar hundert Jahre zurückwirft.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Charles David Richards
- Mugger
- (as Stoney Richards)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This is one of those few films from my childhood that made a strong impression on me, mainly for the Eddie Murphy's WAM joke. I remembered it had something to do with a faulty new tank in the Iraq war and US engineers at home desperately trying to make something work in it. Oh the good memories.
But now that I rewatched it, well Eddie Murphy and the tank take up only 1/5 of the movie, while everything else is dedicated to a poor plot about a looser caught up in a spy novel, later dropped and substituted for poor planning by the ministry of defense.
Besides Murphy tank escapade, only the Russian spy was entertaining to watch, but he only appeared in a couple of scenes. Everything else was a chore to watch. The special effects aren't that impressive. The idiot boss is just intolerably dumb. The portrayal of foreigners were horrid. And I have no idea why the wife and child subplot was even necessary, because you could literally replace them with a sealing fan to resolve the main flaw. Oh Guess I forgot those parts for a reason.
One of the main problems was the editing of events – the tank was developed after the main plots got resolved, but the movie was spliced like it all was happening simultaneously. Unfortunately that meant that the tank flaws were already resolved, or not, so there was really no suspense.
Let's just say the best parts of the movie were about 5-10 minutes long and I would not have missed anything rewatching it. At some points I even confused Dudley Moore's acting for a Rowan Atkinson impersonation. That confusion kept me more entertained then the actual movie.
At least some of it is good to riff over.
But now that I rewatched it, well Eddie Murphy and the tank take up only 1/5 of the movie, while everything else is dedicated to a poor plot about a looser caught up in a spy novel, later dropped and substituted for poor planning by the ministry of defense.
Besides Murphy tank escapade, only the Russian spy was entertaining to watch, but he only appeared in a couple of scenes. Everything else was a chore to watch. The special effects aren't that impressive. The idiot boss is just intolerably dumb. The portrayal of foreigners were horrid. And I have no idea why the wife and child subplot was even necessary, because you could literally replace them with a sealing fan to resolve the main flaw. Oh Guess I forgot those parts for a reason.
One of the main problems was the editing of events – the tank was developed after the main plots got resolved, but the movie was spliced like it all was happening simultaneously. Unfortunately that meant that the tank flaws were already resolved, or not, so there was really no suspense.
Let's just say the best parts of the movie were about 5-10 minutes long and I would not have missed anything rewatching it. At some points I even confused Dudley Moore's acting for a Rowan Atkinson impersonation. That confusion kept me more entertained then the actual movie.
At least some of it is good to riff over.
This is no masterpiece, but it's pretty good and offers lots of laughs and excitement. The ending is especially satisfying.
Dudley Moore does a pretty good job. I'm aware he has received acclaim for some of his roles. This isn't one of them.
I know David Rasche best as a reckless cop supposedly based on Dirty Harry. He's nearly as talented here.
Eddie Murphy dies what he does best: laugh and cry. However, I've seen better from him.
Don't expect too much, and I don't believe this film will disappoint.
Dudley Moore does a pretty good job. I'm aware he has received acclaim for some of his roles. This isn't one of them.
I know David Rasche best as a reckless cop supposedly based on Dirty Harry. He's nearly as talented here.
Eddie Murphy dies what he does best: laugh and cry. However, I've seen better from him.
Don't expect too much, and I don't believe this film will disappoint.
No amount of alcohol can render this film bearable. I saw Eddie Murphy on Letterman a few years after this dog was released, talking about why he has to be careful with which scripts he accepts. He said, "A few years back I made a film called Best Defense. And it was bad. [looks into camera] REAL bad!"
5Doom
Brilliant? Um, no. Does the ending more or less blow? Sure. But does it have its moments and does it have a serious pair of balls on it? Yep.
Best Defense deserves a (moderately) better reputation than it's been left with. For starters, even though he seems embarrassed to even be IN the movie most of the time, Dudley Moore IS funny in here and has his funny scenes (I miss him). Eddie Murphy (even though his scenes are obviously pasted in) is the 1984 Eddie Murphy that we used to love so much (you can keep the 'Disney' Eddie Murphy of late, thank you) and is worth a few good laughs, and David Rasche (yes... SLEDGE HAMMER!) is a stitch as Jeff (the KGB agent). The scene where David is throwing Dudley all around the bar is worth the price of admission alone (assuming that's a small rental fee for the VHS tape, that is).
It's worth a look, if only because it makes moves that few movies (if any) these days have the guts to make - give it a chance - see it drunk if you have to. :)
Best Defense deserves a (moderately) better reputation than it's been left with. For starters, even though he seems embarrassed to even be IN the movie most of the time, Dudley Moore IS funny in here and has his funny scenes (I miss him). Eddie Murphy (even though his scenes are obviously pasted in) is the 1984 Eddie Murphy that we used to love so much (you can keep the 'Disney' Eddie Murphy of late, thank you) and is worth a few good laughs, and David Rasche (yes... SLEDGE HAMMER!) is a stitch as Jeff (the KGB agent). The scene where David is throwing Dudley all around the bar is worth the price of admission alone (assuming that's a small rental fee for the VHS tape, that is).
It's worth a look, if only because it makes moves that few movies (if any) these days have the guts to make - give it a chance - see it drunk if you have to. :)
I actually had a bit part in this film. It was filmed in Israel around 1985 in the desert and I got to work with Eddie Murphy. In one scene I appear (for about 10 seconds)standing in a jeep behind Eddie Murphy's jeep. I only mention this because I told my parents to see the film in the theater. My biggest regret is that they had to pay FULL PRICE to sit through an awful experience. I would not recommend this film to anyone.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThough Eddie Murphy is listed as Strategic Guest Star, he claimed in an interview with David Letterman that he was paid more for his work in this film than for Nur 48 Stunden (1982) and Die Glücksritter (1983) combined.
- Zitate
Chief Padilla, Guatemala: Boom. Dead. Communista.
- Alternative VersionenABC edited just 35 seconds from this film for its 1987 network television premiere.
- VerbindungenFeatured in At the Movies: The Stinkers of 1984 (1985)
- SoundtracksOn the Road Again
Written by Willie Nelson
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Best Defense?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 18.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 19.265.302 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 7.872.297 $
- 22. Juli 1984
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 19.265.302 $
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen