IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,9/10
1316
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuTwo wannabe heroes and their friends must stop a madman from giving everyone nightmares.Two wannabe heroes and their friends must stop a madman from giving everyone nightmares.Two wannabe heroes and their friends must stop a madman from giving everyone nightmares.
Lorenzo Music
- Ralph, the All-Purpose Animal
- (Synchronisation)
Judith Kahan
- The Fairy Godmother
- (Synchronisation)
- (as Judith Kahan Kampmann)
Marshall Efron
- Synonamess Botch
- (Synchronisation)
Julie Payne
- Flora Fauna
- (Synchronisation)
Hamilton Camp
- Greensleeves
- (Synchronisation)
Paul Frees
- Narrator
- (Synchronisation)
- …
T.G. Sheppard
- Rusher of Din - Office Executive
- (as William Browder)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I have grown up with this movie. I was a pre-teen when I first saw it, and I've watched it every year or so since then, and I get something different out of it each time. One of this film's strengths (and maybe one reason why it wasn't a success) is that it targets a huge cross-section of people...there is some relatively vulgar humour (I have never heard the G dialogue so I don't know how much of the humour that removed...hopefully Botch still eats the insect in his navel!), references to parts of our culture, social commentary (the Rushers of Din would LIKE to be friendly, but their just isn't any TIME), a heroic and exciting story, some disturbing nightmarish imagery, some cute stuff for the kids, lots of self-aware humour, and -- in my opinion the biggest asset -- it's damn weird. Especially the dialogue. The voice actors are phenomenal, and they occasionally mutter their lines, which adds to the strangeness of the whole project. It's great, years later, to finally decipher one of those lines!
Technically, it's amazing. The work that went into this film...I always find myself fascinated by Botch's mouth -- his rapidly moving mouth is a series of mouth photographs brilliantly matched and synced with his dialogue -- and everything just looks GOOD. And unique, in that curious tissue-paper animation style.
This is the only film I can think of that I can show to anybody, at any age. Little kids have heard worse language than what comes out of Botch's (brilliant) mouth, and so has my grandmother.
The only downside, maybe, are the dated pop songs. Bruce Hornsby (who, in my opinion, sounded bad in 1983 as well)! That said, the orchestral score is catchy, crazy, and beautiful at times, so it's not all bad.
In fact, it's all very, very good, overall.
Technically, it's amazing. The work that went into this film...I always find myself fascinated by Botch's mouth -- his rapidly moving mouth is a series of mouth photographs brilliantly matched and synced with his dialogue -- and everything just looks GOOD. And unique, in that curious tissue-paper animation style.
This is the only film I can think of that I can show to anybody, at any age. Little kids have heard worse language than what comes out of Botch's (brilliant) mouth, and so has my grandmother.
The only downside, maybe, are the dated pop songs. Bruce Hornsby (who, in my opinion, sounded bad in 1983 as well)! That said, the orchestral score is catchy, crazy, and beautiful at times, so it's not all bad.
In fact, it's all very, very good, overall.
This is the kind of picture John Lassiter would be making today, if it weren't for advances in CGI. And that's just to say that he'd be forgotten, too, if technology hadn't made things sexy and kewl since 1983. _Twice..._ has got the same wit, imagination, and sense of real excitement that you'd find in a Pixar flick, only executed under the restrictions of the medium c. 1983. Innovative animation techniques combine with a great script and excellent voicing to produce a movie that appeals on lots of levels. It should be spoken of in the same breath with _Spiritited Away_ and _Toy Story_.
I kind of liked this animated film, at least the first time. On the second viewing, this George Lucas-produced movie was too slow for me. Why I found that, I can't remember (it's been awhile) but on my first look I remember the uniqueness of this movie.
It is different from the rest simply because it gives you a combination of animation and black- and-white stills. It goes back and forth and sometimes on the same scene. The visuals aren't the only strange aspects. You also get a dash of zaniness in this comedy. You just don't know what crazy thing you are going to see next. There are so many unexplainable scenes that it's one of these films is better seen than explained!
I traded the VHS, along with others, for DVDs when they first came out. Now, I wish I could see this again......on DVD.
It is different from the rest simply because it gives you a combination of animation and black- and-white stills. It goes back and forth and sometimes on the same scene. The visuals aren't the only strange aspects. You also get a dash of zaniness in this comedy. You just don't know what crazy thing you are going to see next. There are so many unexplainable scenes that it's one of these films is better seen than explained!
I traded the VHS, along with others, for DVDs when they first came out. Now, I wish I could see this again......on DVD.
Man , I always forget how good this film is until someone says "Are you here to work or what"? And I start to reply "I am here to what, and where am I? ( Paraphraising the film) Love the story, my twin girls thikn it is "The Bomb"!! (a ggod thing they tell me!) It is soo sad Warner Bros does not run with this on DVD with alot of the behind the scenes stuff. Especially since they have NO other "Lucas" propertierws I am aware of in the Library at the studio in Burbank!
You never know a good thing till it's gone do ya ol' WB????
You never know a good thing till it's gone do ya ol' WB????
Animation I shall always have a soft-spot for, and while Twice Upon a Time is not one of the best animated movies I've seen, it is still great especially for how unique it is. The animation has a style that I have never seen before in an animated film but it is an interesting one. It is colourful and the character features especially Botch's mouth are just as impressive. The nightmarish scenes are incredibly haunting, the accidental nightmare sequence is a definite standout, in fact of any animated film I've seen recently it was this scene that really stood out as uniquely fascinating and hugely impactful. Some of the pop tunes are on the dated side, but are still very catchy. The incidental score is one of Twice Upon a Time's greatest assets, very beautiful and addicting, there are some crazy aspects as well that fit very well. The script is witty and funny, the humour is quite racy for the time but very effective still, while the story is exciting, the characters are interesting the voice acting from particularly Lorenzo Music and Marshall Efron is top-notch. All in all, unique and great animated movie, sadly also it is underrated. 9/10 Bethany Cox
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAt a 2015 Q&A at BAM Cinematek, John Korty revealed why there was a version of the film with strong language. The film was always intended to be appropriate for young children, and Korty's final cut was almost identical to the 1991 home video release. After answer prints had been made based off his final cut, Korty went to New York to begin pre-production on another project while test screenings of "Twice Upon a Time" were taking place in California. Bill Couturié one of the film's producers and co-writers, noted that college-aged audience members frequently walked out during the first ten minutes. After nearly the entire audience at a screening at USC walked out, Couturié reassembled some of the voice actors to record more profane versions of the film's dialogue in the hopes that it would keep teens and adults interested enough to watch the film to completion. John Korty was kept completely out of the loop on these changes, and didn't find out until he was watching the film at its premiere. Korty was furious, even more so when he found out release prints were made using this more profane version. Theater programmers didn't know these changes had been made either, and one of the few theaters in the country to show the film on its original release ran it on a double bill with the G-rated Mrs. Brisby und das Geheimnis von NIMH (1982). When outraged parents notified theater management, Twice was pulled from further showings.
- Zitate
Greensleeves: Happy as rats they are. They tap dance not, neither do they fart.
- Crazy CreditsThe first half of the end credits features a collage of pictures of crew-members.
- Alternative VersionenThere are two major versions of the film. John Korty's original version, and a version which added profanity and vulgar dialogue to several scenes (Botch's opening monologue to his minions, Botch's dialogue while he's in his bathtub, Botch ordering his minions out to get the spring, Botch's ecstatic response when Rudy returns with the spring, and some muttering by Scuzzbopper after his manuscript was dropped from the Murkworks (through a window) by Botch). This latter version had a very limited theatrical release in 1983, and was shown at least twice on HBO in 1984-1985 (see Trivia for why there were two versions in the first place). Warner Archive's 2015 DVD version gives viewers the option to watch the film with the original audio or the more vulgar re-recorded dialogue.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Animation Lookback: The Best of Stop Motion - Independent Films (2015)
- SoundtracksTwice Upon A Time
Written by Maureen McDonald, Tom Ferguson & Michael McDonald
Performed by Maureen McDonald
Executive Producer Michael McDonald
Produced by Ken Melville & Dawn Atkinson
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Twice Upon a Time?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Drömmarnas land
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 14 Min.(74 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen