El pico

One of those where were you when you first saw it films. Extraordinarily gloomy in its outlook, the only redeeming character being the dying mother.

The acting is also variable though very styylised. Gritty, unpleasant, urban and claustrophobic, the storyline just concentrates on unkowing self destruction for all.

Manzano is not a subtle actor which serves to emphasise the physicality on screen rather than any emotional nuances. The subject drugs and their impact is laboured to literal death here, but that approach works.

Ultimately very disturbing if you have western susceptibilities. The result is very effective cinema which the director did not take on board personally, a crying shame!

This is one of the most realistic and shocking movies about drugs ever made, and one of the best I have ever seen. Set in Bilbao Spain in the early 80's we meet two teenagers Paco and Urko who deal drugs for living and hag out with Betty a foreign prostitute whom together they share sex and drugs mainly Heroin, Paco also hags out with a Homosexual local artist in secret. Well, the problem begins when Paco and Urko become addicted to Heroin, and not only that, Paco is the son of a sergeant of the Guardia Civil and Urko's dad is a leader of an important political party.

The film's atmosphere is cold and dark, the scenes of drug use sex and nudity are quit explicit, the acting and direction are good, probably one of Eloy De La Iglesias's best work.

Like Chrisnine F. it's based on a true story, the sequel is also not to be missed (EL PICO 2)

Interesting and thought-provoking look about youthful delinquency , drugs and terrorism in Spain from the 80s . Intelligent , shocking and thrilling film based on facts about juvenile delinquency in north of Spain . It deals with a duo of inseparable friends turned delinquents named Paco(Jose Luis Manzano) and Urko (Javier Garcia) , together they share drugs . They are forced into street hustling and ever-expanding life of crime . Paco is son of a stiff Guardia Civil Commandant (Jose Manuel Cervino) and Urko of an Aberzale Congressman (Luis Iriondo) . The protagonists choose to live dangerously and they are forced to take a life of crime to survive and attempt to flee the suburbs of Bilbao . Paco hag out with Betty (Lali Espinet) ,an Argentinian whore who deliver them heroin . Paco also hags out with a gay sculptor (Enrique San Francisco) who helps him . Both of them scheme and carry out robberies to earn money in and around Bilbao , Baracaldo and Neguri slums . So, they'll have to gather some money and in order to get drug mainly heroin and anything that's necessary to obtain it . The young junkers in Bilbao embark on an armed robbery to raise the money that they use to rise their existence . As they attack a drug-runner named El Cojo (Ovidi Montllor) and his wife (Marta Molins) and the events get worse .

¨El Pico¨ is one of several movies dealing with youth delinquence in Spain during the 70s and early 80s along with ¨Perros Callejeros I and II¨, ¨ Los ultimos Golpes Del Torete¨, ¨Yo el Vaquilla¨, mostly realized by Jose Antonio De La Loma , ¨Navajeros , "Colegas", "El Pico 2" and especially ¨Deprisa , Deprisa¨ by Carlos Saura and later ¨La Estanquera De Vallecas ¨ , among others . These films were notorious in the years of the Spanish transition to democracy including provoking and polemic issues and played by unknown young people . His style is pretty much urban and realistic as well in the atmosphere as in the fresh dialog and attempted to take a position in favor of outcast people . Drugs , delinquency, and generational problems are the habitual subjects in these films and specially dedicated to the underworld of heroin and a very realistic look at drug addiction . Passing of time hasn't had mercy with most of those movies , but they represented a time and a way of life in the history of Spain ; and now they may seem a little bit naive . In ¨El pico¨ we watch the day-by-day of a duo of delinquents committing violent crimes , however Eloy De La Iglesia got to make a both lyric and documentary-style flick . A great look at young life and friendship in the margined side let the story flow efficiently and being realized in realistic style . We see their troubles growing in such streets , slums or "barrio" from Bilbao and outskirts as Baracaldo and Neguri and some fine locations . The director creates a sort of Spanish Neo-Realism by tackling the juvenile delinquency in the Bilbao streets from a sociological point of view . Eloy De La Iglesia shows the ugliness of those "barrios" , toughness and cold existence . The screenplay by Gonzalo Goicoechea is such strong with disagreeable events , including lots of nudism , violent scenes , though also with some ingenuousness , but in 1980, a few years after General Franco died it wasn't naive at all. Eloy De La Iglesia chose young and natural actors as Jose Luis Manzano and Javier Garcia who play their part to the hilt , unafraid of filmmaker's unsympathetic camera and the particularity of the characters . Passable photography with juicy atmosphere by Hans Burman , deemed one of the best Spanish cameraman , but unfortunately turns too much murky in some video print , being necessary a a correct remastering . Followed by another surprising sequel ¨El Pico II¨ with same actors and director .

The motion picture is professionally directed by Eloy De La Iglesia though with some flaws and gaps . De La Iglesia is a good Spanish movies director , he began working in cinema in 1966, though he became notorious in the years of the Spanish transition to democracy with shocking and polemic films as ¨El Pico 1 and 2¨ , ¨El Diputado¨, ¨The priest , ¨Clockwork terror¨ , ¨La Otra Alcoba¨ , ¨El Techo De Cristal¨, ¨La Semana Del Asesino¨ , and after ¨Bulgarian lovers¨ and many others . Drugs, delinquency, terrorism and generational problems are the habitual subjects in his films , and specially dedicated to the underworld of heroin ; as well as the gay world . With the passing of time hasn't had no mercy with most of Eloy's movies, but there they are : they represent a time and a way of life in the history of Spain ; and now they may seem a little bit ingenious . As Eloy De La Iglesia chose young and natural actors Jose Luis Manzano , Pirri, or Quique San Francisco were the usual ones . All of them early deceased by drugging , including the filmmaker . Rating : 5,5 , Acceptable and passable.

I am from Bilbao, Basque Country. I find that movie really a nice and very convincing tale of what was going on those years with GUARDIA CIVIL, Spanish police, the oppression against anything that was basque and the drugs that were used by the spanish police at that time, as a weapon against people. Against the free will of the basque politics.

Oppresion was shown on both sides of the society.

Young people was into heroin, that make them an instrument of the power, they were more interested in substance than in their freedom. And this is an important thing that is displayed into the movie, because that was what actually happened here. Of course, there was something else and it was the spanish goberment using violence and terrorism against the freedom of basque people. But that was going to be another story, told later on.

7 stars out of 10.

I know about the quinqui cinema and I have just watched "navajeros", "colegas", and then this one. In that order.

Regardless of the undeniably exploitative relationship that Eloy had with Jose Luis Manzano (due to both his position and age), I am only going to focus on his work. Having watched those three I can tell he fell in love with the subject and ran with it, but by this movie, he was also running out of energy and passion.

De la Iglesia obviously had more resources 3 years after "Navajeros", maybe because of that he felt that he needed to do more and drag this longer than necessary.

It feels like this movie should have ended with an open end by the time the guys are in the presence of the drug after being clean. Evaristo's disenchantment and doubts were already clear. The second part of the movie is more about the parents but we don't even get to know enough of Martin Aramendía, besides his affiliation.

I see that people talk about its "realistic portrayal". If we're talking about youth's problems and drug use, he had already done that before and far more effectively without a character explicitly telling us how he had changed throughout. I think some might have a more romantic perspective of the film due to its portrayal of ETA (for a second), the socialist party and the civil guard. I think the movie suffers due to its shifting focus. If it had focused mostly on fleshing out both parents and developing their relationship, I think we would have had a far superior movie. However, it is not just that, but the youth drama of any of his previous films plus many melodramatic and corny resources that made this the less enjoyable of the three films - the portrait of the dying mom was such a laughable scene.

Since he had already shown pubes, full frontals and gore before, this time De La Iglesia focused on the injections. I don't find the needles shocking but sad - I assume he let them get high on film. He would have done so but again, I don't want to talk about how these kids' realities and needs were exploitated by the admired director. Yet it seems I cannot.