Tango
- 1981
- 8 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
7,7/10
3225
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuSubsequent characters appear in a poorly-decorated room, intertwining but never colliding, all possessed by never-ending rituals.Subsequent characters appear in a poorly-decorated room, intertwining but never colliding, all possessed by never-ending rituals.Subsequent characters appear in a poorly-decorated room, intertwining but never colliding, all possessed by never-ending rituals.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- 1 Oscar gewonnen
- 6 wins total
Empfohlene Bewertungen
10Hitchcoc
In this masterpiece of timing and cinematic movement kept me enthralled for the full period. One begins to focus on a single entity and soon another moves into the room. There is true choreography everywhere. The movements of the characters never clash, they move seamlessly, doing the same repetitive dance. It's impossible for a brief review to do this justice. I would urge everyone to see this at some point.
The movie slowly grabs you. One simple layer of action is coordinated with another simple layer. A third and a fourth join this constellation of action till we have so many layers weaving about each other that I lost count. The entrance of the delightful blonde stole the show for me, adding sexiness and a dash of mischief. Great fun!
Quite simply mesmerising. I saw this in the modern art museum in Warsaw and saw it 3 times before I left the room. I think I'll probably watch it another 10 times on YouTube before I even come close to appreciating how intricate and clever it is (THIS is what marks it apart from the soppy The Snowman that some seem to think deserved the Oscar).
The interaction (without actual interaction) between the multitude of characters is fascinating to behold.
As my partner put it, "I'm freaking out!"
Tango is a fantastic short, animated as a collage of live action film clips. It begins simply, with one boy retrieving a lost ball in a repeating pattern. He is joined by others who also follow repeating patterns of their own. It climaxes with a screen packed with individuals all going about their business in complete ignorance of the actions of the others, and ends as simply as it began. All this is done without words (except for the repeated shout of a man falling from a table). If you have the opportunity, I highly recommend this artistic short.
There are few short films as quietly audacious as Zbigniew Rybczynski's Tango (1981). At first glance, it's just a room. A dozen or so characters. And a bunch of doors. But give it a moment, and you realize you're witnessing something that's less film and more a perfectly choreographed dance of chaos and control-shot, layered, and edited long before "digital" was a household word.
Rybczynski didn't just shoot a film; he invented a new way to bend time and space. Imagine dozens of characters performing their loops-slamming doors, reading newspapers, chasing a cat-all on the same stage, but none ever bumping into one another. The trick? Multiple exposures painstakingly composited together, frame by frame, before computers made such feats routine. It's a technical marvel that feels like watching a Swiss watch in motion: every cog clicking perfectly in time.
But Tango isn't just a showcase for wizardry. Beneath its mechanical beauty lies a sly commentary on the claustrophobia of everyday life-especially in Cold War Poland, where conformity was both demanded and defied. These repeated actions, these overlapping routines, capture the strange tension of living inside a system that prizes order but can't quite suppress human unpredictability.
And it's funny, too-in a deadpan, almost absurdist way. The film's title could easily be mistaken for a romantic dance, but this Tango is more about the push and pull of routine and rebellion, of isolation in a crowded room. The black-and-white visuals, coupled with a hypnotic score, make the whole thing feel like a fever dream of daily life seen under a microscope.
Watching Tango now, in an age where visual effects can create entire universes with a click, you appreciate just how ahead of its time it was. It's a film that demands patience, precision, and a willingness to be swept up in its looping world-a world that is as mesmerizing as it is oddly relatable.
In short: Tango isn't just a film. It's a reminder that even in the most regimented spaces, life finds a way to dance.
Rybczynski didn't just shoot a film; he invented a new way to bend time and space. Imagine dozens of characters performing their loops-slamming doors, reading newspapers, chasing a cat-all on the same stage, but none ever bumping into one another. The trick? Multiple exposures painstakingly composited together, frame by frame, before computers made such feats routine. It's a technical marvel that feels like watching a Swiss watch in motion: every cog clicking perfectly in time.
But Tango isn't just a showcase for wizardry. Beneath its mechanical beauty lies a sly commentary on the claustrophobia of everyday life-especially in Cold War Poland, where conformity was both demanded and defied. These repeated actions, these overlapping routines, capture the strange tension of living inside a system that prizes order but can't quite suppress human unpredictability.
And it's funny, too-in a deadpan, almost absurdist way. The film's title could easily be mistaken for a romantic dance, but this Tango is more about the push and pull of routine and rebellion, of isolation in a crowded room. The black-and-white visuals, coupled with a hypnotic score, make the whole thing feel like a fever dream of daily life seen under a microscope.
Watching Tango now, in an age where visual effects can create entire universes with a click, you appreciate just how ahead of its time it was. It's a film that demands patience, precision, and a willingness to be swept up in its looping world-a world that is as mesmerizing as it is oddly relatable.
In short: Tango isn't just a film. It's a reminder that even in the most regimented spaces, life finds a way to dance.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesOn April 11, 1983, at The 55th Annual Academy Awards (1983), Polish animator Zbigniew Rybczynski (pronounced "Rib-chin-ski") had probably the worst night that any Academy Award winner has ever had at the annual Oscar show. When presenter Kristy McNichol announced Rybczynski's short film, Tango (1981), as the winner in the Best Animated Short category, she mispronounced his name as "Zib-new-ski...sky." When Rybczynski accepted the award at the podium, the orchestra cut off his acceptance speech with the "Looney Tunes" theme. After talking with reporters in the press room backstage, Rybczynski stepped outside into an alley to have a cigarette. When he tried to re-enter the theater, an overzealous security guard refused to let him back in. Although Rybczynski was holding his Oscar, he was wearing a cheap tuxedo and tennis shoes, because he had been unable to afford better clothes. Rybczynski tried to explain things, but his English was poor, and the guard assumed he was drunk and called two police officers, who slammed the Polish director up against the wall. During the altercation, Rybczynski reportedly shouted, "American pig! I have Oscar!" and tried to kick a policeman in the groin. Rybczynski spent the night in jail before the mess was sorted out.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Pieces of Silver (1989)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Танго
- Drehorte
- Łódź, Łódź, Polen(only interiors, Studio Se-ma-for)
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 8 Min.
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.37 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen