Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA British foreign intelligence spy, posing as an executive of a toy company, has his cover blown, and enemy agents try to force him to reveal the identities of his fellow operatives.A British foreign intelligence spy, posing as an executive of a toy company, has his cover blown, and enemy agents try to force him to reveal the identities of his fellow operatives.A British foreign intelligence spy, posing as an executive of a toy company, has his cover blown, and enemy agents try to force him to reveal the identities of his fellow operatives.
Carl Möhner
- Inspector
- (as Carl Moehner)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Long time since I saw this but remember liking it.
I don't think it is out on dvd.
Certainly it is never on tv anymore.
I try not to be nostalgic but in the 1970s and 1980s broadcast tv in the UK showed lots of films and I sat and watched them.
There is a British cable channel that shows old films,and I love it but it hows mostly British films,where are the old Hollywood films?
Anyway I am a spy/war/crime film fan so dvd companies get this one out there.
I don't think it is out on dvd.
Certainly it is never on tv anymore.
I try not to be nostalgic but in the 1970s and 1980s broadcast tv in the UK showed lots of films and I sat and watched them.
There is a British cable channel that shows old films,and I love it but it hows mostly British films,where are the old Hollywood films?
Anyway I am a spy/war/crime film fan so dvd companies get this one out there.
A surprisingly stylish spy flick, based in Munich and London.
It has a few twists (some of them predictable) but the aspect that intrigued me most was the information exchange.
It's all done with tremendous subtlety, and you could easily watch the entire film and miss most of the exchanges.
I had a similar experience with "Funeral in Berlin".
That's what I like about a spy film, when you can watch it superficially and miss what is really going on. So the film becomes a shill for real life spying, where the public see relative normality, but the spies, though present in the normal life of the public around them, are functioning on a completely different level.
I would have to watch this film several times to pick out and understand all of the communications.
The film was made in 1968, and is very much of that era (which I like).
It has a few twists (some of them predictable) but the aspect that intrigued me most was the information exchange.
It's all done with tremendous subtlety, and you could easily watch the entire film and miss most of the exchanges.
I had a similar experience with "Funeral in Berlin".
That's what I like about a spy film, when you can watch it superficially and miss what is really going on. So the film becomes a shill for real life spying, where the public see relative normality, but the spies, though present in the normal life of the public around them, are functioning on a completely different level.
I would have to watch this film several times to pick out and understand all of the communications.
The film was made in 1968, and is very much of that era (which I like).
It has zippy music, attractive locations and Camilla Sparv as an affable boytoy, but that world is not enough. Hits all the action man buttons of the 60s, race car driver, MI6, spy, playboy, and on. But he's not Bond and not Harry Palmer, and therein lies the problem.
Stephen Boyd miscast so the tone of the movie was not dark enough to sustain strong interest. The ending was good as she plays both Scott and Harris off each other and gets both of them, and her cohorts, out of the spy game. A better script would have concealed then revealed complex betrayals and alliances and, perhaps, who Sparv really worked for and to what purpose. Forty or so years later Casino Royale got it right.
Stephen Boyd miscast so the tone of the movie was not dark enough to sustain strong interest. The ending was good as she plays both Scott and Harris off each other and gets both of them, and her cohorts, out of the spy game. A better script would have concealed then revealed complex betrayals and alliances and, perhaps, who Sparv really worked for and to what purpose. Forty or so years later Casino Royale got it right.
Stephen Boyd made several films during the mid-to late 60's, which all seem to have "slick" plots in which he portrays a wealthy, sophisticated, cosmopolitan character sporting perfectly coiffed hair. Neither the hairstyle nor the roles seemed to suit him well, and I'll bet he was vastly relieved to switch to westerns like Shalako and The Man Called Noon in the '70's. Assignment K, however, is probably the best of the "smooth hair" movies. He's a international spy in this one and a lot of the action takes place in a ski resort so the scenery is beautiful and wintry. He and Camilla Sparv play well together and, best of all for Stephen Boyd fans like me, he is on-screen throughout the entire film, no cameos here - a major plus for this movie. Leo McKern, another wonderful character actor, turns up once again as the bad guy. (Remember him as the irascible, but lovable Captain Brandt in Lisa?) Assignment K is fairly fast-paced and somewhat exciting, especially if you enjoy a little romance with your espionage. And the ending will surprise you!
An almost decent production after the James Bond model. Stephen Boyd has not the strength and the charm of Sean Connery or Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton or Pierce Brosnan, he is in the category of George Lazenby, a slightly better than the latter. The story is in the Bond spirit, but much simpler and more predictable. The other actors are somewhat OK. Robert Hoffmann and Jeremy Kemp have small roles. Leo McKern and Michael Redgrave stand out. And the Scandinavian "beauty" named Camilla Sparv is better at marrying very rich and influential men in the world of film than in acting.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesDespite having being billed third and above the title in the main credits, Sir Michael Redgrave only has three scenes. Redgrave made this film at a time when he needed to make some money rather quickly because of a tax demand, and Stephen Boyd recommended strongly that he be cast; Redgrave had been a great help to Boyd when the latter was a struggling actor.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Changes (1970)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Assignment K?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Assignment K
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 37 Minuten
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Geheimauftrag K (1968) officially released in India in English?
Antwort