IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,3/10
807
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuTwo wealthy aristocrats lure a virginal girl to a Spanish island for a night of sex, death and cannibalism.Two wealthy aristocrats lure a virginal girl to a Spanish island for a night of sex, death and cannibalism.Two wealthy aristocrats lure a virginal girl to a Spanish island for a night of sex, death and cannibalism.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Kali Hansa
- Kali
- (Nicht genannt)
Caroline Rivière
- Carole
- (Nicht genannt)
Lina Romay
- Silvia
- (Nicht genannt)
Pamela Stanford
- Prisoner
- (Nicht genannt)
Monica Swinn
- Prisoner
- (Nicht genannt)
Pierre Taylou
- The Tied Man
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Have you read the Most Dangerous Game, also known as The Hounds of Zaroff? It's a short story by Richard Connell that came out in the 1920s. Even if you haven't read it, no doubt you know the story, there have been countless adaptations and movies based on the same idea. People trapped on an island, and being hunted off one by one by some very sick individuals. Sounds like Battle Royale, sounds like The Condemned, even sounds like the recently popular tween flick, The Hunger Games. What can I say, it's a damn good story. But I bet no one has ever seen anything quite like Jess Franco's version of this popular tale. Can you imagine if the fans of The Hunger Games saw this?! It would blow their minds!!! This is the one and only, Countess Perverse.
Countess Perverse follows the story far more closely then the previous mentioned adaptations, our villains are even referred to as Countess and Count Zaroff. The only difference being, Franco adds a certain... flavour.. to the mix, to make this flick quite the tasty treat. And of course, when Franco is involved, we know things are bound to get a little saucy. Actually that's an understatement, think of this as a very...sensual... version of the Most Dangerous Game. Some might even call it sleazy. And it is, I do recall a rape scene that very quickly turns into a consensual encounter. And of course the forever lingering shots directed at female genitalia, oh Franco, you romantic you! For the most part, the entire cast spend most of the movie nude. And with stars such as the always gorgeous Lina Romay, it's quite a sight. Rejoice for the human form and all it's beauty!
To add more beauty to this somewhat erotic movie, we have a gorgeous setting. The island is breathtaking, it's surrounded by beautiful ocean views, menacing rock formations, and interesting architecture for the Mansion that our victims find themselves in. The scenes where our cast walk down the steps in the house, tinted red, is such an interesting and menacing shot, it really stood out for me.
Finally, the music is quite beautiful in parts and also quite tribal in others. Really sets the movie for me. Just gorgeous. I'm coming to appreciate the musical sense in Franco's work. He knows how to tone the scenes.
Final thoughts? Most people probably would dismiss this movie as trash or porn without giving it more of a chance. It's unfortunate because this movie offers so much more than that, and while some scenes might be considered borderline pornographic, the film goes above and beyond those scenes. In a similar vein to Lorna the Exorcist, it's a damn good movie and one I recommend fans or Euro horror. Just be warned that this is an 18 years and over flick. Sorry kiddies, you keep enjoying The Hunger Games.
Countess Perverse follows the story far more closely then the previous mentioned adaptations, our villains are even referred to as Countess and Count Zaroff. The only difference being, Franco adds a certain... flavour.. to the mix, to make this flick quite the tasty treat. And of course, when Franco is involved, we know things are bound to get a little saucy. Actually that's an understatement, think of this as a very...sensual... version of the Most Dangerous Game. Some might even call it sleazy. And it is, I do recall a rape scene that very quickly turns into a consensual encounter. And of course the forever lingering shots directed at female genitalia, oh Franco, you romantic you! For the most part, the entire cast spend most of the movie nude. And with stars such as the always gorgeous Lina Romay, it's quite a sight. Rejoice for the human form and all it's beauty!
To add more beauty to this somewhat erotic movie, we have a gorgeous setting. The island is breathtaking, it's surrounded by beautiful ocean views, menacing rock formations, and interesting architecture for the Mansion that our victims find themselves in. The scenes where our cast walk down the steps in the house, tinted red, is such an interesting and menacing shot, it really stood out for me.
Finally, the music is quite beautiful in parts and also quite tribal in others. Really sets the movie for me. Just gorgeous. I'm coming to appreciate the musical sense in Franco's work. He knows how to tone the scenes.
Final thoughts? Most people probably would dismiss this movie as trash or porn without giving it more of a chance. It's unfortunate because this movie offers so much more than that, and while some scenes might be considered borderline pornographic, the film goes above and beyond those scenes. In a similar vein to Lorna the Exorcist, it's a damn good movie and one I recommend fans or Euro horror. Just be warned that this is an 18 years and over flick. Sorry kiddies, you keep enjoying The Hunger Games.
Back in the early 90s, as I teen, I ust to read Darkside Magazine, and Jesus Franco always took up a portion of it.
These movies were generally not in the public gallery, and to me they looked more like soft porn than horror. I would usually skip this section, but with birth of the internet I finally got around to watching them.
I can see why the British horror magazines gave Jesus Franco attention. For sure 50 percent is misogynistic porn. Cant even say soft porn, as there are real sexual acts on camera. Probably why hey never took off in UK at the time, as they would have been banned.
It is seldom taken from a female perspective, and indulges in male dark fantasies. Female on female intercourse, and close ups of hairy vaginas take up a good part of the running time of the movie. There is also sexual violence, but it presented in a erotic sexy sort of way. It is perverse, but in horror movie perspective rather tame. Sado masochistic would be best description, a theme that always seems to crop up in his movies.
What I like about these movies most is locations, architecture, mise en scène, dress wear etc. In these areas Jesus Franco is genius.
Better than hammer horror, or anything we were producing in UK in aesthetic sense, or at least on par with the very best.
His camera explores Spanish locations, not unlike he explores the female body with a passion, and the architecture and locations used are 2nd to none. Makes some interesting use of the wide angle lens in interior shots too.
I see influence movies like this may have had on Tim Burton/ David Lynch etc. From jutting volcanic rock faces, from islands emerging from the sea, to architectural marvels, his cinematography creates a kind of ethereal flow for the most part, which makes his movies easily watchable.
If sexual content is something that particularly offends you, then you wont like this movie. It could be easily accused of not taking sexual violence seriously, or eroticising it: but from a movie fans perspective, these movies are far from a dead loss.
It could easily upset feminists for example. Others may just find it slow paced and boring, with an over preoccupation with sex scenes. These criticisms would be certainly not be unfounded either lol.
This film was interestingly enough released the same year as Franco the dictators rule ended in 1975. This movie is in French but the location is the seaside town of Alicante according to IMDB. I been there and thought it was an awful place personally, but Jesus makes it look good some how. We are on an island or at sea for the most part, which probably helped.
With the camera hes almost a Kubrick. "The Most Dangerous Game (1932)", which this movie is said to be based on, is also one of my favourite early horror movies.
These movies were generally not in the public gallery, and to me they looked more like soft porn than horror. I would usually skip this section, but with birth of the internet I finally got around to watching them.
I can see why the British horror magazines gave Jesus Franco attention. For sure 50 percent is misogynistic porn. Cant even say soft porn, as there are real sexual acts on camera. Probably why hey never took off in UK at the time, as they would have been banned.
It is seldom taken from a female perspective, and indulges in male dark fantasies. Female on female intercourse, and close ups of hairy vaginas take up a good part of the running time of the movie. There is also sexual violence, but it presented in a erotic sexy sort of way. It is perverse, but in horror movie perspective rather tame. Sado masochistic would be best description, a theme that always seems to crop up in his movies.
What I like about these movies most is locations, architecture, mise en scène, dress wear etc. In these areas Jesus Franco is genius.
Better than hammer horror, or anything we were producing in UK in aesthetic sense, or at least on par with the very best.
His camera explores Spanish locations, not unlike he explores the female body with a passion, and the architecture and locations used are 2nd to none. Makes some interesting use of the wide angle lens in interior shots too.
I see influence movies like this may have had on Tim Burton/ David Lynch etc. From jutting volcanic rock faces, from islands emerging from the sea, to architectural marvels, his cinematography creates a kind of ethereal flow for the most part, which makes his movies easily watchable.
If sexual content is something that particularly offends you, then you wont like this movie. It could be easily accused of not taking sexual violence seriously, or eroticising it: but from a movie fans perspective, these movies are far from a dead loss.
It could easily upset feminists for example. Others may just find it slow paced and boring, with an over preoccupation with sex scenes. These criticisms would be certainly not be unfounded either lol.
This film was interestingly enough released the same year as Franco the dictators rule ended in 1975. This movie is in French but the location is the seaside town of Alicante according to IMDB. I been there and thought it was an awful place personally, but Jesus makes it look good some how. We are on an island or at sea for the most part, which probably helped.
With the camera hes almost a Kubrick. "The Most Dangerous Game (1932)", which this movie is said to be based on, is also one of my favourite early horror movies.
Jesús Franco got more guts, vision and talent than a legion of today's movie directors. His movies never bore me: Countess Perverse aka La comtesse perverse belongs for sure not to my most favorite list of his works but that flick is still far more entertaining than 90% of Netflix and Amozon Prime productions of our modern days. Countess Perverse: it's trash, it's sleazy, it's funny and it's dumb for sure, but in a good way.
Countess Perverse (1974)
** 1/2 (out of 4)
The Countess (Alice Arno) and Count Zaroff (Howard Vernon) seem like your normal type of people but what horror lies within their castle walls say the otherwise. It turns out that the two are actually cannibals who are provided women by another local (Robert Woods) who the Countess hunts down with her arrow. Soon another woman (Lina Romay) is delivered for their wicked game but things don't go as planned.
Jess Franco's LA COMTESSE PERVERSE is a sexed up version of THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME and like many of the director's work from this period it's available in several versions. The film was originally a hard sell anywhere so the producer had Franco shoot more sex scenes including some hardcore ones. The film would find a release via the hardcore version and this was what was on the market for years. Finally, a 76-minute director's cut of the original version was released as well as a new hardcore version under the title SEXY NATURE.
This was my first time watching the director's cut and it's certainly better than the hardcore versions but I'd still say it falls short of being one Franco's better films. There are some interesting things scattered throughout the picture including an early sequence where one of the women are on a boat and headed towards the island. There's a really weird music score here and the visuals on the boat just make this a rather surreal sequence. The film is actually rather light on the cannibalism subject, although this here was apparently why it couldn't find a release.
The film offers up a nice cast of familiar faces. Vernon is always fun to watch in these Franco movies as is Woods. Both men offer up good performances here. Arno is extremely good in the role of the perverted countess who likes to kill women and then eat them. Romay makes one of her earliest appearances here and she's obviously easy on the eyes. The cast are certainly a major plus and especially since Franco fans will be used to most of them.
I think where the film fails is that there's really no energy or drama throughout. There's never a risk that you feel for the woman and the final hunt is rather boring and the film just doesn't contain enough to keep you fully invested in what's going on.
** 1/2 (out of 4)
The Countess (Alice Arno) and Count Zaroff (Howard Vernon) seem like your normal type of people but what horror lies within their castle walls say the otherwise. It turns out that the two are actually cannibals who are provided women by another local (Robert Woods) who the Countess hunts down with her arrow. Soon another woman (Lina Romay) is delivered for their wicked game but things don't go as planned.
Jess Franco's LA COMTESSE PERVERSE is a sexed up version of THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME and like many of the director's work from this period it's available in several versions. The film was originally a hard sell anywhere so the producer had Franco shoot more sex scenes including some hardcore ones. The film would find a release via the hardcore version and this was what was on the market for years. Finally, a 76-minute director's cut of the original version was released as well as a new hardcore version under the title SEXY NATURE.
This was my first time watching the director's cut and it's certainly better than the hardcore versions but I'd still say it falls short of being one Franco's better films. There are some interesting things scattered throughout the picture including an early sequence where one of the women are on a boat and headed towards the island. There's a really weird music score here and the visuals on the boat just make this a rather surreal sequence. The film is actually rather light on the cannibalism subject, although this here was apparently why it couldn't find a release.
The film offers up a nice cast of familiar faces. Vernon is always fun to watch in these Franco movies as is Woods. Both men offer up good performances here. Arno is extremely good in the role of the perverted countess who likes to kill women and then eat them. Romay makes one of her earliest appearances here and she's obviously easy on the eyes. The cast are certainly a major plus and especially since Franco fans will be used to most of them.
I think where the film fails is that there's really no energy or drama throughout. There's never a risk that you feel for the woman and the final hunt is rather boring and the film just doesn't contain enough to keep you fully invested in what's going on.
La comtesse perverse, directed by Jess Franco, is a film that attempts to blend elements of eroticism, horror, and drama. It tells the story of a countess who indulges in sadistic sexual games with her lovers, leading to a series of mysterious deaths.
The film's cinematography is visually captivating, with its use of shadows and lighting creating a haunting atmosphere. The surreal dream sequences add an intriguing layer to the narrative, making the viewer question what is real and what is not. However, these strengths are often overshadowed by the film's weaknesses.
One of the major issues with La comtesse perverse is its pacing. The story meanders, taking too long to develop and lacking a clear narrative arc. This results in a disjointed viewing experience, which may leave audiences feeling disengaged. Additionally, some of the performances feel stilted and overly dramatic, detracting from the overall impact of the film.
Despite these flaws, there are moments where the film manages to capture the viewer's attention. The exploration of themes such as power dynamics and sexual violence, while controversial, does provoke thought. Furthermore, the film's score, composed by Bruno Nicolai, adds a certain level of tension and suspense.
In conclusion, La comtesse perverse is a mixed bag. While it has its moments of intrigue and visual appeal, these are undermined by its slow pace and inconsistent performances. It may appeal to fans of erotic horror or those interested in exploring unconventional themes, but it falls short of being a truly satisfying cinematic experience.
The film's cinematography is visually captivating, with its use of shadows and lighting creating a haunting atmosphere. The surreal dream sequences add an intriguing layer to the narrative, making the viewer question what is real and what is not. However, these strengths are often overshadowed by the film's weaknesses.
One of the major issues with La comtesse perverse is its pacing. The story meanders, taking too long to develop and lacking a clear narrative arc. This results in a disjointed viewing experience, which may leave audiences feeling disengaged. Additionally, some of the performances feel stilted and overly dramatic, detracting from the overall impact of the film.
Despite these flaws, there are moments where the film manages to capture the viewer's attention. The exploration of themes such as power dynamics and sexual violence, while controversial, does provoke thought. Furthermore, the film's score, composed by Bruno Nicolai, adds a certain level of tension and suspense.
In conclusion, La comtesse perverse is a mixed bag. While it has its moments of intrigue and visual appeal, these are undermined by its slow pace and inconsistent performances. It may appeal to fans of erotic horror or those interested in exploring unconventional themes, but it falls short of being a truly satisfying cinematic experience.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesTwo different houses were used for the Zaroff estate: One for exteriors and a second one for interiors.
- Alternative VersionenThere is a 97 minutes version with inserted hardcore scenes.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Stephen Thrower on 'Countess Perverse' (2012)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Countess Perverse?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- The Evil Countess
- Drehorte
- Calpe, Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana, Spanien(exteriors of El Xanadu and interiors of Club Social de la Manzanera)
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 27 Minuten
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.66 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen