[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Solaris

Originaltitel: Solyaris
  • 1972
  • 12
  • 2 Std. 47 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
7,9/10
102.678
IHRE BEWERTUNG
BELIEBTHEIT
3.372
694
Solaris (1972)
Official Trailer ansehen
trailer wiedergeben3:19
1 Video
99+ Fotos
Abenteuer EpischEpischPsychologisches DramaScience-Fiction-EposWeltraum-Science-FictionAbenteuerDramaMysteriumScience-Fiction

Ein Psychologe wird zu einer Station geschickt, die einen fernen Planeten umkreist, um herauszufinden, was die Crew verrückt gemacht hat.Ein Psychologe wird zu einer Station geschickt, die einen fernen Planeten umkreist, um herauszufinden, was die Crew verrückt gemacht hat.Ein Psychologe wird zu einer Station geschickt, die einen fernen Planeten umkreist, um herauszufinden, was die Crew verrückt gemacht hat.

  • Regie
    • Andrei Tarkovsky
  • Drehbuch
    • Stanislaw Lem
    • Fridrikh Gorenshteyn
    • Andrei Tarkovsky
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Natalya Bondarchuk
    • Donatas Banionis
    • Jüri Järvet
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    7,9/10
    102.678
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    BELIEBTHEIT
    3.372
    694
    • Regie
      • Andrei Tarkovsky
    • Drehbuch
      • Stanislaw Lem
      • Fridrikh Gorenshteyn
      • Andrei Tarkovsky
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Natalya Bondarchuk
      • Donatas Banionis
      • Jüri Järvet
    • 380Benutzerrezensionen
    • 178Kritische Rezensionen
    • 93Metascore
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 2 Gewinne & 4 Nominierungen insgesamt

    Videos1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 3:19
    Official Trailer

    Fotos197

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 190
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung23

    Ändern
    Natalya Bondarchuk
    Natalya Bondarchuk
    • Khari
    Donatas Banionis
    Donatas Banionis
    • Kris Kelvin, psikholog
    Jüri Järvet
    Jüri Järvet
    • Doktor Snaut, kibernetik
    • (as Yuri Yarvet)
    Vladislav Dvorzhetskiy
    Vladislav Dvorzhetskiy
    • Anri Berton, pilot
    Nikolay Grinko
    Nikolay Grinko
    • Nik Kelvin, otets Krisa Kelvina
    Anatoliy Solonitsyn
    Anatoliy Solonitsyn
    • Doktor Sartorius, astrobiolog
    Olga Barnet
    Olga Barnet
    • Mat Krisa Kelvina
    • (as O. Barnet)
    Vitalik Kerdimun
    • Syn Anri Bertona
    • (as V. Kerdimun)
    Olga Kizilova
    Olga Kizilova
    • Gostya doktora Gribaryana
    • (as O. Kizilova)
    Tatyana Malykh
    • Plemyannitsa Krisa Kelvina
    • (as T. Malykh)
    Aleksandr Misharin
    • Shanakhan, predsedatel komissii Anri Bertona
    • (as A. Misharin)
    Bagrat Oganesyan
    • Professor Tarkhe
    • (as B. Oganesyan)
    Tamara Ogorodnikova
    • Anna, tetka Krisa Kelvina
    • (as T. Ogorodnikova)
    Sos Sargsyan
    Sos Sargsyan
    • Doktor Gribaryan, fiziolog
    • (as S. Sarkisyan)
    Yulian Semyonov
    • Predsedatel nauchnoy konferentsii
    • (as Yu. Semyonov)
    Vitaliy Statsinskiy
    • Chlen uchenogo soveta
    • (as V. Statsinskiy)
    Vera Sumenova
      Georgiy Teykh
      Georgiy Teykh
      • Professor Messendzher
      • (as G. Teykh)
      • Regie
        • Andrei Tarkovsky
      • Drehbuch
        • Stanislaw Lem
        • Fridrikh Gorenshteyn
        • Andrei Tarkovsky
      • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
      • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

      Benutzerrezensionen380

      7,9102.6K
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10

      Empfohlene Bewertungen

      10vbertola

      A unique experience

      It's now been some years since I last watched it. Still, I can't get rid of the impressions of emptiness, absurdity and impossibility to understand (the world, and the human mind) that this movie left into me. It can be violent to your mind, without showing a single violent image (by the way, I often see this movie as a counterpart to Clockwork Orange, even more than to 2001). It can stun you, with ten or twenty minutes of incomprehensible silence. It can deprive you of any certainty in the laws of nature - such as, people only die once - and thus leave you vulnerable and naked.

      I know that many friends to whom I've shown this move did not understand it. So I'm not saying you'll like it. But this is possibly the best (non-action) sci-fi movie ever made.

      Watch it at night, alone, when everything out of your home is dark, silent, and cold.
      McGonigle

      One of the best

      This has to be one of the best science fiction movies ever produced. Not because it's filled with gee-whiz gizmos or creepy aliens (it isn't) but because it actually gives you something to think about besides "I wonder how much they spent on *that* shot". When I was a kid, I used to love reading sci-fi because it stimulated my imagination, but as I grew up (especially once "Star Wars" came out), I found that it was harder and harder to find anything remotely resembling imagination or mystery in the genre.

      Well, this movie has restored my faith in what is possible to achieve under the guise of "sci-fi" (obviously, it's older than "Star Wars", but I didn't see it until years later, when I had basically written off the whole idea of science fiction movies). I saw it 10-15 years ago when it was re-released in the USA and liked it then, but seeing it again recently has convinced me that this is an all-time classic. As I said, it actually stimulates thought (rare enough in most sci-fi movies), but on top of that, it has a real and profound emotional impact that's far beyond what you find in most "dramas", let alone "kid stuff" like sci-fi. If this movie is intended to be an "answer" to "2001" (I'm not convinced that it is), the main contrast is that "Solaris" concerns itself with real human emotions, whereas the most interesting character in "2001" is the computer.

      For those who complain that it's boring, just go see something else. You'll obviously never get it. If the opening shot of water and plant life didn't tip you off to the fact that this movie is intentionally paced a little bit more deliberately than, say, "Buckaroo Banzai", then you should go out and try to get some sort of clue before watching this movie. It's not boring... it's SLOW. It's *meant* to be slow. Some of the scenes exist solely to set a mood, not to advance the plot. If you can't handle that, then this isn't the movie or you. But if you're able to sit still for 3 hours without squirming, and if you're able to enjoy a movie without having every idea spelled out in giant neon letters, then you just might like "Solaris", and find that it haunts you for years to come.
      8a_gulliver

      What a beautiful film

      Shame on me for not realisng the 2002 film with George Clooney was essentially a remake of a Russian film made 30 years previously. I ought to have known, I am that sort of person.

      So comes December 2009, and Film 4 show both Solaris films. I sat transfixed by the Russian film. Visually it is a thing of beauty, and it is a rare thing - a film which requires input from the viewer. This movie requires you to think for yourself...and some people find that difficult.

      I enjoy a rip-snorting entertaining action movie as much as most people, but rare films like Solaris leave me feeling so much more fulfilled. There are ambiguities, not so much loose ends untied as dots which the viewer is required to connect for himself.

      Try Solaris. If you find yourself twiddling your thumbs after 15 minutes then its probably not for you. If you find yourself glued to the screen then you know how I feel about this film.
      9OttoVonB

      "Nobody loves poetry like a Russian!"

      This line from Dr Zhivago says all you have to know about Tarkovsky. He was a thinker and a poet. An artist who's work was at once smart, engaging and aesthetically beautiful! Solaris is a world that materialized thoughts and absorbs creatures into its own consciousness. "Solaris" is an allegory on man's place in the universe, the twisted concept of reality, the meaning of love, grief and - ultimately - life. Psychiatrist Kris Kelvin goes to the station orbiting the planet-entity to assess whether the madness of it's occupants means all exploration should be discontinued. What he finds there are all the demons he has brought with him. You the viewer shall experience the same thing, for Solaris is an inviting and questioning but never manipulative film. What you'll get out of it depends on what you bring with you.

      Solaris is often accused of being slow. This is a common misinterpretation: Solaris makes you anxious, and willingly so. Too many segments are like mirrors that invite your mind to venture off into many uncomfortable a place (the traffic scene comes to mind: an allegory for the space voyage but also for fading life and powerlessness). Solaris also makes you fear, with a sense that something isn't quite right and as with the best horror films, what you dread often isn't even on screen. Solaris makes you heart ache on several occasions as well. It makes you miss loved ones and it makes you feel homesick. every additional minute that separates you from the gorgeous opening shots of nature makes you long for Earth.

      Solaris is many things but above all it is simply more than entertainment: it is a voyage for the senses, like a favorite song that binds countless disconnected feelings and thoughts. It is a poem.
      8evanston_dad

      Cerebral Sci-Fi

      It's tough to come into a film like "Solaris" without tremendous expectations after having heard for so long about its greatness. If you don't immediately feel like it's one of the best movies you've ever seen -- after hearing so many say it is -- you're either tempted to overcompensate and exaggerate how overrated it is out of a sense of defensiveness, or think something's wrong with you for being the only one not to "get it."

      As with most movies that have been saddled with the word "greatness," I understand why "Solaris" is considered to be such a watershed movie and so revered by so many, but I have to admit that I didn't personally feel myself responding to it all that much. Maybe I would on a second (or third or fourth) viewing, but I can't say I'm very compelled to watch it again. It's cerebral and philosophical, which I expected, and a bit cold and emotionally uninvolving despite the fact that it's about almost nothing but human emotions and how we react to life's biggest mysteries. I didn't warm much to the characters or ever really think of them as individual human beings so much as necessary conduits for communicating the film's philosophical ruminations. Despite being set in the vast reaches of space, it's a claustrophobic movie, which I think is intentional. We never see space, only the cramped interiors of a spaceship, and that feels right, since the movie is more about the vast universe contained within Man's head than it is about the great physical universe beyond our solar system's borders.

      What I liked most about "Solaris" is that it suggests that Man isn't really developed enough to handle breakthroughs in our understanding of the larger universe. Given the chance to explore space and engage with elements beyond our comprehension, the characters in the movie instead spend all of their time ruminating over and regretting the people they left behind on Earth and the mistakes they made there. It's almost like Mankind turns to solving giant huge mysteries as a distraction from the fact that we're not capable of cracking the lesser, more mundane mysteries of everyday life, like love, commitment, and dependence on one another.

      "Solaris" does have one chilling and memorable ending, I'll give it that. If we go poking around in what we don't understand, it seems to say, we may very well find ourselves unable to return to what we do.

      Grade: A-

      Handlung

      Ändern

      Wusstest du schon

      Ändern
      • Wissenswertes
        This was the most widely seen of Andrei Tarkovsky's films outside of the Soviet Union. However, Tarkovsky himself reportedly considered it the least favorite of the films he directed. Not being a fan of the science fiction genre (which he criticized for its "comic book trappings and vulgar commercialism"), he was nevertheless persuaded to propose this adaptation of the eponymous and popular sci-fi novel 'Solaris' to appease the Soviet censors. However, he considered the film an artistic failure because of its need for technological dialogue and special effects, which prevented it from transcending its genre; something he believed his movie Stalker (1979) did better.
      • Patzer
        At the moment when the station attains zero gravity, the candlestick passes floating in the air, with the flames burning the same as in earth. Actually, with zero gravity, the fire doesn't go upward, candle flames would rather be spherical and very weak (blue).
      • Zitate

        Dr. Snaut: Science? Nonsense! In this situation mediocrity and genius are equally useless! I must tell you that we really have no desire to conquer any cosmos. We want to extend the Earth up to its borders. We don't know what to do with other worlds. We don't need other worlds. We need a mirror. We struggle to make contact, but we'll never achieve it. We are in a ridiculous predicament of man pursuing a goal that he fears and that he really does not need. Man needs man!

      • Alternative Versionen
        The Region-4 DVD was released by Shock as part of its Distinction Series and runs at 2 hours and 49 minutes, with some noticeable cut scenes throughout the films. This 2-disc set doesn't contain any deleted/alternate scenes.
      • Verbindungen
        Edited into Spisok korabley (2008)
      • Soundtracks
        The Little Organ Book: Ich Ruf Zu Dir, Herr Jesu Christ - BWV 639
        Composed by Johann Sebastian Bach (as I. S. Bakh)

      Top-Auswahl

      Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
      Anmelden

      FAQ26

      • How long is Solaris?Powered by Alexa
      • Who is the midget in Sartorius' room?
      • What's the meaning behind the switches between black-and-white scenes and color scenes throughout the movie?
      • Who composed the main theme of this film, and what is the name of the piece?

      Details

      Ändern
      • Erscheinungsdatum
        • 20. September 1974 (Ostdeutschland)
      • Herkunftsland
        • Sowjetunion
      • Offizieller Standort
        • TVP VOD
      • Sprachen
        • Russisch
        • Deutsch
      • Auch bekannt als
        • Điều Tạo Nên Con Người
      • Drehorte
        • Akasaka, Minato, Japan(Berton's car scenes)
      • Produktionsfirmen
        • Mosfilm
        • Chetvyortoe Tvorcheskoe Obedinenie
      • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

      Box Office

      Ändern
      • Budget
        • 1.000.000 RUR (geschätzt)
      • Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
        • 22.168 $
      • Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
        • 11.537 $
        • 15. Sept. 2002
      • Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
        • 230.989 $
      Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

      Technische Daten

      Ändern
      • Laufzeit
        • 2 Std. 47 Min.(167 min)
      • Farbe
        • Color
        • Black and White
      • Sound-Mix
        • Mono
      • Seitenverhältnis
        • 2.35 : 1

      Zu dieser Seite beitragen

      Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
      • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
      Seite bearbeiten

      Mehr entdecken

      Zuletzt angesehen

      Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
      Hol dir die IMDb-App
      Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
      Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
      Hol dir die IMDb-App
      Für Android und iOS
      Hol dir die IMDb-App
      • Hilfe
      • Inhaltsverzeichnis
      • IMDbPro
      • Box Office Mojo
      • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
      • Pressezimmer
      • Werbung
      • Jobs
      • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
      • Datenschutzrichtlinie
      • Your Ads Privacy Choices
      IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

      © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.