Das Bildnis des Dorian Gray

One of inspired versions of the novel by Oscar Wilde. For the fair portraits of Dorian, Harry and Basil, Richard Todd offering the perfect tones for his character. For the portrait itself and its last form of degradation. For the revelation of soul to Basil and scene of murder. For the hunting scenes and for the way to reflect his character proposed by Helmut Berger.

Not the last , for the images of sin and the more realistic and profound exploration of the relation with Sybill ( not the last, for wise solution of her last gesture ).

In short, provocative, no doubts, but well integrated in the frame of 1970 sexual revolution One of fundamental good points - the manner to craft his Henry Wotton of brilliant Herbert Lom.

Massimo Dallamano's film of Oscar Wilde's work places the story to the London of the 1960s. Even though many reviews obviously didn't like this and wrote rather negative about the film, I think the story works surprisingly well.

Helmut Berger is excellent and undeniably gorgeous as the (in the end tragic) title character, but also the other actors deliver their best. Especially Herbert Lom as Henry Wotton acts absolutely great, and most of the women are not only very pretty, but also deliver convincing performances.

All in all, "Dorian Gray" surely is the most unusual film version of the writing, it is rather drama than horror, but that's what Oscar Wilde's work is too, isn't it? I guess that Oscar Wilde would have liked this.

This updating of Oscar Wilde's Victorian-age novel, "The Picture of Dorian Gray," to the 1970s and translating of the English-language text to Italian is surprisingly faithful--more so in some ways than the classic 1945 MGM version, among others. I generally don't find faithfulness important for an adaptation, but in this case it's usually for the best. And, the ways in which it does diverge from Wilde are interesting, including all of the 1970s style. I also believe that this is the first screen version to be explicit about homosexuality, which, of course, even the book wasn't (although granted, chronologically, this is only the third Dorian Gray film I've found available after the 1945 one and a 1915 silent two-reeler).

Some of the film techniques employed leave much to be desired, including the abruptness of the opening prolepsis, and its point-of-view shots of bloody hands. Some of the sex scenes are too long as well, although they're not very explicit because the bodies are generally obscured by foreground objects. Consequently, some consider this trashy or a sexploitation film, but I don't necessarily agree. At least, it could've been a lot more risqué considering its source. Anyways, it's not the gorgeous piece of art that the MGM film remains. It does, however, have plenty of 1970s fashion and style and a groovy soundtrack. It also benefits from the most-appropriate-looking (as far as being blonde, blue-eyed, young and handsome) and probably best-looking Dorian to ever appear on screen, Helmut Berger. The removal of many of Wilde's epigrams, however, leaves an unusually dull Henry.

Unlike other versions, including the 1945 and 2009 ones, this film doesn't do away almost entirely with the details of Sybil Vance's Shakespearean acting. It keeps the reason that Dorian rejects her because of her poor performance, even though she still has sex with him, as in the other movies and as just about everyone else in this film does. It bothers me that other adaptations miss the self-reflexive implications and theme of artistic illusion of this plot point. Another thing I like here is that it doesn't add a second grand romance, who is either related to Basil or Henry, for Dorian. It's entirely unnecessary. The Gladys here is an actual character from the book who partly fits that bill, instead, as well as the host of other characters from Wilde whom Dorian shags here. One of these liaisons explains his wealth, as 1970s Dorian, apparently, must work unlike his 19th-century counterpart. Another is the source of his blackmail of Alan Campbell, which is unexplained in the novel. The Alan storyline also involves photography, which is better employed here than it was in the 2009 "Dorian Gray."

Most sensationally, however, is the scene where Dorian drops the soap in the shower and Henry picks it up, and there are a few more homosexual hookups besides that. Oddly, the two characters I thought were most coded as gay when reading the novel are straight here: Basil, who gushes over his feelings for Dorian's looks in the book and fears that his portrait will expose those feelings, is merely a painter for hire here; and the usual theory of Alan's blackmail in the book is that Dorian threatened to expose his homosexuality--a crime back then, for which the author Wilde would later be sentenced. Dorian, Henry and Gwendolyn, on other hand, all take part in this iteration. I'm also rather surprised by the lack of drugs for a 1970s low-budget, supposed exploitation film. Even Wilde had Dorian visit an opium den. Regardless, this remains the most daring Dorian Gray screen adaptation to that date, which benefited by its updating to the sexual revolution.

In the late 60's in London, the model Dorian Gray (Helmut Berger) meets the aspirant actress Sybil Vane (Marie Liljedahl) and they fall in love for each other. Meanwhile, his friend Basil Hallward (Richard Todd) concludes his painting, and Dorian Gray, fascinated with the picture, proposes the devil to exchange his soul per a permanent youth and beauty. From this moment on, the character and behavior of the former sweet Dorian changes and he becomes a corrupt and amoral man, sex driven and capable of destroying many lives inclusive Sibyl's. While his friends grow older, Dorian remains young never aging, but his painting discloses his innermost ugliness, fruit of his despicable social conduct.

"Dorian Gray" is a good contemporary adaptation of the famous Oscar Wilde's classic novel "The Picture of Dorian Gray", which I believe is one of the books most read, or at least known, worldwide. Everybody is familiarized with this dramatic and evil story. The handsome Helmut Berger fits perfectly to the role and I really liked this underrated movie. Massimo Dallamano's version is original, attractive and has a good international cast. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "O Retrato de Dorian Gray" ("The Picture of Dorian Gray")

Note: On 14 July 2022, I saw this film again.

Updated to the Swinging Sixties, produced by infamous exploitation guru Harry Alan Towers and directed by a one-time cameraman from 'spaghetti' Westerns, this is - incredibly enough! - one of the best versions of Oscar Wilde's oft-filmed Decadent classic. At the very least, such a hedonistic decade allows for a frank portrayal of Dorian's bisexuality, promiscuity and drug addiction - hinted at so strongly in the novel, but barely glimpsed in Albert Lewin's 1945 film classic.

Its trump card is the presence of gorgeous Helmut Berger as 'the god named Dorian' (to quote the Italian title). If there was ever a more inspired bit of casting in film history, I can't think of it right now. Best known as the protege of Luchino Visconti, the beauteous Berger here proves himself as an actor in his own right. In or out of his deliciously camp Carnaby Street wardrobe, Berger glows with golden-limbed hedonism and seductive evil!

Backing him up is a splendid supporting cast. Herbert Lom as the sinister gay aesthete Lord Henry Wotton, whose barbed witticisms are lifted directly from Wilde. Margaret Lee and Eleonora Rossi Drago as two Sapphic jet-setters. Isa Miranda as a raunchy and vulgar American millionairess. (Her outfits would make Fellini blush for shame!) Not too sure about Euro-porn starlet Marie Liljedahl and Richard Todd is a bore as the painter Basil Hallward.

But even when the acting falters, the outrageously kitsch costumes and settings make this film a visual delight! Will I ever recover from that first sight of Dorian's zebra-lined 60s shag pad? Somehow I doubt it. This whole film is sleazy, trashy, vulgar, over-the-top...a shameless piece of camp on every level. Poor old Oscar Wilde would have adored every minute of it! And so do I!