Der Dämon mit den blutigen Händen

Well, fans of Gothic style 50s horror will love this classic movie. For me, I was expecting a little more 'vampire' in the story, like a gorgeous vampiress dressed in a gown with fangs galore to bite the neck of those she seduces - but sadly no.

The movie starts with the Count being staked through the heart and buried, before his servant 'Karl' (who plays a good Igor like character) takes his masters body to a mental asylum to revive him.

After a Doctor is wrongly accused in court of killing a patient through blood transfusing, he is sent to the asylum for his life-long punishment, only to become a servant to the Count, who wants to use his expertise in surgical practise on other inmates, mainly their blood.

This movie has the imagery of Hammer Horror, given by it's writer Jimmy Sangster, but sadly lacks the punch of a good dramatic Vampire story.

As classic Gothic horrors go, it's worth a look.

The one enduring image from this film that has haunted me across the years is the weird hunchback assistant to the villain. Its an image that was splashed across horror magazines of my childhood. There was something about the twisted fellow with an eye that drooped to his cheek that made you want to see the movie. I never saw the film as a kid and it wasn't until tonight, well into my adulthood, that I managed to see the film. I can't say I was disappointed.

The plot concerns Dr John Pierre who is wrongly thrown in jail. He is redirected to the asylum/prison run by Dr Callistratus so that John Pierre can help Callistratus with his experiments concerning blood. As those outside the prison attempt to free him through legal means Pierre is forced to deal with the strange goings on in the prison, including fending off the sadistic Carl, the hunchbacked assistant of Callistratus.

Gothic, and grandly over the top in the way that most of the Hammer films weren't this is a cheesy but fun attempt at copying the Hammer Studios formula. It looks and feels very much like Hammer in it styling and plotting (Then again Jimmy Sangster of Hammer wrote the script) .Shot in color, the print I saw was well worn and a bit faded. I wonder how this would have looked at the time of its original release. It must have looked great. I loved the sets which were done in such a way as to give the illusion of space, unfortunately it turned every location into spaces the size of football stadiums (though in several sequences things were much too cramped).

The whole thing reminded me of the sort of thing you used to run across at 2am on late night TV with too many commercials. Actually as much as I liked the film I do think it is a bit plodding and probably could have used either trimming or a commercial break or two.

Strangely this film is very difficult to see. I'm at a loss as to why this film has fallen through the cracks over the last 40 odd years. Its not a bad movie, though it is a tad creaky and of a style they haven't done since Hammer stopped making movies. Perhaps its simply a matter of falling between the cracks in finding a distributor (it was not done by a "major producer"), or more likely the fact that there is no vampire with wings and fangs as promised in the title. What ever the real reason its a shame because this film is worth a look.

If you like Hammer style horror or good but rarely seen films, search this one out and give it a try. Its certainly worth a bag of popcorn on a Saturday night watch movies.

I couldn't agree more with the positive comments on this much-overlooked Hammer-styled gem. The 2006 Dark Sky DVD double-feature (with "The Hellfire Club") is a *must-have* for any fan of the early Hammer films. A delightful drive-in double-feature program design, including concessions ads, trailers and even an intermission, really adds to the enjoyment of the these two classic films. The transfer on both is quite respectable, certainly much superior to anything previously available, and is in anamorphic widescreen. Kudos to Dark Sky for their outstanding work on this and many other rare genre classics!

British filmmakers Robert S. Baker and Monty Berman were among the first to try and duplicate the success of Hammer Films' horror pictures and they did quite well. One of the reasons is that they used Jimmy Sangster, the same screenplay writer that Hammer did. He would write four of their five genre films. Another is that they were able to capture the look of the Hammer films as both Baker and Berman were cinematographers before becoming producers and took turns filming their movies. They occasionally directed them as well. As all their films were B movies, they were quite successful. However the team went into television in 1962 and struck it big with THE SAINT starring a young Roger Moore.

The title BLOOD OF THE VAMPIRE is a misnomer as there is no vampire in the movie. In fact there is nothing supernatural at all. What you have is a Gothic melodrama with a heavy dose of Grand Guignol added in an attempt to emulate the Hammer blockbuster THE CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN which was made the year before (1957). Hammer's iconic DRACULA with Christopher Lee was made after this film but released before it so the vampire title may have been an attempt to cash in on the success of that movie. Many online reviewers slam the film for not having an actual vampire in it which is too bad as BOTV has a lot going for it once you get past that fact.

For starters the movie is wonderfully atmospheric with a dark color palette in the opening and a wonderfully gruesome sound effect as the "vampire" is being staked. Later on there are some truly impressive dungeon sets and an underground laboratory for nefarious experiments. Celebrated Shakespearean actor Donald Wolfit (made up to look like Bela Lugosi) is Dr Callistartus, a mad scientist who drains prisoners of their blood in order to keep himself alive. Australian actor Vincent Ball and Hammer regular Barbara Shelley are the romantic couple trying to escape from the diabolical doctor. Character actor Victor Maddern is very good as a Quasimodo like character who faithfully serves the doctor.

Sangster's script borrows elements from 19th century mainstays FRANKENSTEIN, THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME, and THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO. Images and situations from this film would later turn up in Mario Bava's BLACK SUNDAY and Georges Franju's EYES WITHOUT A FACE so it did have an impact on its initial release. For years it was thought lost before turning up on VHS in the late 1980s. This 2006 Dark Sky release uses an excellent color print and is coupled with the Baker/Berman team's last horror film, THE HELLFIRE CLUB which is more of a historical adventure. The DVD comes with retro drive-in commercials and recreates the old double feature presentations...For more reviews visit The Capsule Critic.

Here's a well-done Hammer-styled "cash-in" of Horror of Dracula, interestingly enough done by a US production company and released by Universal (Universal-International in those days), which of course was the company that did all those great classic horror films that Hammer eventually updated with great success.

It is too bad that this film has been so neglected that it cannot be seen except on worn-out and ridiculously expensive factory VHS tapes that are rare, or on DVD duplicates made off of faded 16mm film prints. I saw this 30 years ago on TV from a good 35mm print and remember that the colors were great, but the recent 16mm dupe I saw was really faded. Still, increase the TV color saturation, and it's way better than nothing at all. (UPDATE: I thought I'd better update this now that a factory DVD has been recently released. No longer do you have to pay way too much to see this.)

The few occasional lapses in logic notwithstanding, this is bound to please any fan of the early Hammer horror films, and Donald Wolfit does a great turn as the doctor who has become a sort of living vampire. Though there are no real supernatural elements, this film tops many others without having to rely upon the fantastic to carry it. A fabulous beginning title sequence is followed by a great scene where the vampire-doctor is revived, with his misshapen servant beside him, and then a large bat flies out from the ceiling rafters. You would swear it was an actual bat, and then wonder how did they get it to do it just right?

As an example of the attention to detail you'll see here: during a conversation between two prisoners, a rat scurries behind one unnoticed and for no other reason than to show that the place is a squalid jail cell. Nobody sees it, yells or stomps on it, or anything you'd expect to happen in another film. It's just there and passes by. Now that's real set design!