Heiße Grüße vom CIA

I'm not sure why I find it so difficult to enjoy the spy film genre. Whether legitimate or spoof seems to make no difference. There is something about the genre that attracts the infantile perhaps, certainly there is a fetish for playthings, gadgets (and women!) where even in the most serious maybe things are not taken too seriously. With this the first of Umberto Lenzi's spy films I thought maybe there would be a complete subversion of the genre (certainly my box cover suggests so) more a spaghetti spy story with little reverence for the old originals. But no this treads a fairly well worn path (except for the female lead) and takes itself pretty seriously at first. Gradually one feel that Lenzi throws in the towel because it does become slightly amusing and maybe more of a spoof but even so there is no hard edge, all the fights are crap, most of the dialogue laughable (not that laughable) and the sex scenes brought up short. There is some fine location shooting particularly on the streets of Cairo and later in the alps but not enough to make this very watchable.

Spies movie that is able to interest the viewer in its simplicity.

It is not something transcendental but it makes a good impression.

I can't believe how many movies of this type have come out in those years.

Two secret agents join forces in Egypt (and later in Switzerland) to locate & destroy an anti-radar device, and retrieve the plans of its design. One is a British male; the other is an American female. Her code name is 008, and, as the title suggests, she is actually the central hero(ine) of this film, quite atypically for its day. The two agents have an equal partnership, but if anyone is closer to the "sidekick" role, it's the man. Ingrid Schoeller plays what is quite possibly the first attempt of international cinema to create a female James Bond-type character: she is beautiful, curvaceous, sweet, intelligent, armed with gadgets, expert with a gun, and can handle herself in a fight without needing a man to rescue her (as she proves in a daring escape from an enemy-riddled beauty saloon). All this, combined with the lively banter between the two leads and the crazy double-twist ending (the first twist is smart; the second nonsensical!), make "A 008: Operazione Sterminio" one of the most enjoyable Eurospy movies of the period. **1/2 out of 4.

The bravura euro-crime director, and part-time cannibal fetishist Umberto Lenzi takes a strident foray into the heady, glamorous, if not a little silly, cinematic imaginarium of the 60's euro-spy actioner; and, to be fair, he certainly gives it his best shot. While it isn't quite up there with Lenzi's uber-kult offering 'Kriminal', the film certainly makes for an adequate time-waster, and would be much appreciated by those individuals who enjoy this especially frivolous, and day-glo coloured genre. '008-Operation Exterminate' is a fun ride, and makes a rather lissome, highball quaffing companion to Jess Franco's 'Lucky The Inscrutable'.

This film begins in Cairo where a special weapon has just been created that distorts long range radar making it difficult for ships to navigate correctly. As a result, the British decide to send an agent by the name of "Frank Smith" (Alberto Lupo) to Egypt where an American agent named "MacDonald" (Ingrid Schoeller) is waiting to greet him. At first, Frank is surprised to find that his American colleague is female and this creates a certain amount of sexual tension from that point on. However, what makes matters even more difficult for the two of them is the fact that the people who possess the anti-radar device know all about the identities of these two and have already made plans to terminate them upon sight. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that this wasn't one of the better "James Bond clones" ever made due in large part to the fact that neither Alberto Lupo nor Ingrid Schoeller had the same on-screen presence as many of the actors in a similar role. As a result, the sexual tension wasn't that acute which rendered most of the film somewhat dry and lifeless. That being said, this wasn't necessarily a bad film necessarily and for that reason I have rated it accordingly. Slightly below average.