[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Carrasco, der Schänder

Originaltitel: The Outrage
  • 1964
  • Approved
  • 1 Std. 36 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,2/10
2648
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Carrasco, der Schänder (1964)
DramaKriminalitätWestlich

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuTravelers in the 1870s Southwest discuss a recent murder trial in which all the principals told differing stories about the events.Travelers in the 1870s Southwest discuss a recent murder trial in which all the principals told differing stories about the events.Travelers in the 1870s Southwest discuss a recent murder trial in which all the principals told differing stories about the events.

  • Regie
    • Martin Ritt
  • Drehbuch
    • Michael Kanin
    • Akira Kurosawa
    • Ryûnosuke Akutagawa
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Paul Newman
    • Laurence Harvey
    • Claire Bloom
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    6,2/10
    2648
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Martin Ritt
    • Drehbuch
      • Michael Kanin
      • Akira Kurosawa
      • Ryûnosuke Akutagawa
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Paul Newman
      • Laurence Harvey
      • Claire Bloom
    • 47Benutzerrezensionen
    • 17Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    The Outrage
    Trailer 2:44
    The Outrage

    Fotos9

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 3
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung10

    Ändern
    Paul Newman
    Paul Newman
    • Juan Carrasco
    Laurence Harvey
    Laurence Harvey
    • Husband
    Claire Bloom
    Claire Bloom
    • Wife
    Edward G. Robinson
    Edward G. Robinson
    • Con Man
    William Shatner
    William Shatner
    • The Preacher
    Howard Da Silva
    Howard Da Silva
    • Prospector
    Albert Salmi
    Albert Salmi
    • Sheriff
    Thomas Chalmers
    • Judge
    Paul Fix
    Paul Fix
    • Indian
    Jeffrey Darwin Bowman
    • Baby
    • (Nicht genannt)
    • Regie
      • Martin Ritt
    • Drehbuch
      • Michael Kanin
      • Akira Kurosawa
      • Ryûnosuke Akutagawa
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen47

    6,22.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    7Nazi_Fighter_David

    Newman deserves credit for trying something boldly unusual

    Newman's fifth film for Martin Ritt, "The Outrage" was based on the classic Japanese film "Rashômon," but Ritt transplanted the tale to the South Western U.S. following the Civil War…

    Carrasco has been convicted of raping a woman (Claire Bloom) and murdering her husband (Laurence Harvey), but four eye-witness accounts conflict… All agree that the bandit raped the woman, but only one asserts that he committed the killing…

    Sadistic, defiant, and challenging, Carrasco snarls, sneers, and walks with macho arrogance, to hide the fact that he can only be strong by tying a man to a tree and raping his wife…

    The role allowed Newman to give a bravura performance, not unlike Toshiro Mifune's in the Kurosawa film, and the stylization would fit the story if everybody else weren't playing it so straight… As it is, the performance seems too showy, easily understandable, exaggerated
    proffer

    Not bad for a remake. Better than I expected.

    I'm glad I saw this film. It's probably of not much interest to someone who isn't a student of film...but if you're familiar with Kurosawa's "Rashomon" or the camera work of James Wong Howe, then it's worth a view.

    Then again....maybe you don't need to be a film buff.

    Capt. James T. Kirk as a preacher. Paul Newman with a bad mustache and equally suspicious accent. Edward G. Robinson chewing the scenery. Howard Da Silva wearing either a tumbleweed or a small dog.

    When a few minutes in, and it became clear to me that this was going to be a fairly "faithful" remake of the original...I settled in for the long haul, dreading what was to come as Hollywood took a masterpiece and "westernized" it. It wasn't as bad as I expected. I agree with an earlier comment that the final "re-telling" is pretty funny.

    I teach "Rashomon" in my History of Film course. I realize that many western students just can't fully appreciate much of the Japanese culture packed into Kurosawa's work. I'd love to figure a way to show "Rashomon" and "The Outrage" back-to-back. The better students might appreciate the artistry of Kurosawa a bit more; the lunk-heads might finally figure out what was going on. At least a couple of idiots each term seem to think the wife and the medium in "Rashomon" are the same woman. In "The Outrage" it's kinda hard to mistake Claire Bloom for an elderly Native American man.
    5abooboo-2

    Shoots Itself in the Foot

    If you're going to do a movie with multiple flashbacks told from different points of view, the ground covered in those flashbacks better be damned interesting. Such is not the case here. Each witness' version of the events in question becomes progressively more pedestrian until the final one is played for laughs. This is the movie's point, of course, that people would rather believe well-spun myths which confirm their own preconceived notions about human nature than a banal truth that won't conform. All fine and good, but it's a danged self-destructive way to tell a story. Especially when James Wong Howe's apocalyptic visuals (those rain-drenched scenes at the isolated train station are almost Blade Runner-ish in their darkness and despair) are gearing you up from the first moment for some grimly powerful examination of evil.

    The sad fact is that Laurence Harvey and Claire Bloom, as the victimized husband and wife at the heart of the film, do not come across as terribly noteworthy or distinctive. You keep waiting for some explosive revelation that might account for the idealistic Parson (played by William Shatner - young and fresh-faced but overly-mannered even then) to be so shattered by the incident that he loses his faith, but no luck. Edward G. Robinson is excellent as the old con artist with no illusions about mankind, while a close to unrecognizable Paul Newman does an entertaining Anthony Quinn impression as the dastardly bandito.

    The train station segments are sensational, film-making at its best, but the endless flashbacks are flat and tedious as hell, making this film a uniquely disappointing experience.
    artzau

    A Classic. Period.

    Sometimes, I'm amazed at the low level of commentary on these films. This one is no exception. The reviewer opening these comments comments on a "Western" as if this were a Roy Rogers or Gene Autry oater. While I'm aware that we all have the right to express our views, I would like to see a little more insight on those selecting which reviews will be presented. This film is a remake and reset of the Kurusawa classic and is a classic in its own right. Fine, fine performances are given by Newman, Harvey, Bloom, Shatner(in his pre-Kirk days), Robinson, Salmi, Da Silva and Fix in this casting of a Japanese film play-- which is a composite of two stories, BTW-- by Akira Kurusawa. It's not perfect. The role of the medium, the old Indian shaman portrayed by veteran character actor, Paul Fix, doesn't have the cultural impact of the original. There is confusion around the rape and fight scene, but these are small things. The film is marvelous and the black and white setting captures much of the shading and light contrasts of the original Rashomon. The story in both films, which Kurusawa wove out of two earlier stories, is full of archetypes but lacking much of the impending chaos of the original. The first tale of the old gate at kyoto tells of a ronin confronting an old woman and taking the blanket from an abandoned child in the time of civil war and political upheaval; the other tale, in the woods, tells of the various versions of rape, murder, honor and shame, told by each of the participants. Kurusawa blended them into an excellent film story. While the cultural background of the original sets it apart from this American version, there is much that does make it work. The genteel Southern couple, the Mexican bandido, the pragmatic sheriff, the country preacher, the snake-oil salesman and the miner/prospector, fit the Samurai, bandit, medium, etc., of the original very well. So, face it. It ain't John Wayne. But it's good cinema at it best.
    6bkoganbing

    A Little Subjectivity Here And There

    Having never seen Rashomon I'm at bit of a disadvantage in writing about The Outrage. Nevertheless it's an attempt at something a little more unusual than the average western.

    As even the beating of Rodney King caught on videotape was successfully challenged in a court of law, what does that say about eye witness testimony? The Outrage is the story of an incident on a western trail that left a traveler dead and his wife ravaged by a bandit on the run.

    Rashomon the film is only the grandfather of The Outrage. It was first adapted as a Broadway play with Rod Steiger and Noel Willman playing the roles that Paul Newman and Laurence Harvey have on screen. It ran for 159 performances in the 1959 season and Claire Bloom who was Mrs. Rod Steiger at the time was the only one to repeat her role. Rod Steiger would have been a far better choice to repeat for the screen and he certainly has the screen name recognition. Newman was better box office, but Steiger was far better at playing all kinds of ethnic types.

    Added to the screen are the characters of Edward G. Robinson and William Shatner playing a conman and a disillusioned minister whose conversations with prospector Howard DaSilva provide a kind of narrative framework for the proceedings. DaSilva provides one of four versions of the events.

    All we know for certain is that Claire Bloom got violated by Paul Newman and Laurence Harvey wound up dead. At Newman's trial, he and Bloom provide differing accounts of what happened. An old Indian medicine man played by Paul Fix came upon a dying Laurence Harvey and Fix repeats it for the court. And then DaSilva tells Shatner and Robinson yet another version of the same events.

    Bloom is a southern belle, not quite of the upper crust, she married well and she does her best to imitate the behavior of one of the upper crust, no doubt taking Scarlett O'Hara as her model. Laurence Harvey is Ashley Wilkes had he married a road show version of Scarlett instead of Melanie Hamilton. Repeating her performance from Broadway, I'd say Claire was the best one in this film.

    The conclusion was most unsatisfactory in my humble opinion, the focus could have and should have stayed on the three protagonists not on the witnesses. Still The Outrage is definitely a most adult western.

    Mehr wie diese

    Einer muß dran glauben
    6,4
    Einer muß dran glauben
    Raubzug der Wikinger
    6,0
    Raubzug der Wikinger
    Kein Lorbeer für den Mörder
    6,8
    Kein Lorbeer für den Mörder
    Süßer Vogel Jugend
    7,1
    Süßer Vogel Jugend
    Machenschaften
    5,5
    Machenschaften
    Lady L
    5,5
    Lady L
    Der zweite Mann
    6,5
    Der zweite Mann
    Von der Terrasse
    6,7
    Von der Terrasse
    Eine neue Art von Liebe
    5,7
    Eine neue Art von Liebe
    Der Wildeste unter Tausend
    7,8
    Der Wildeste unter Tausend
    Herrscherin der Wüste
    5,8
    Herrscherin der Wüste
    Hemingways Abenteuer eines jungen Mannes
    6,3
    Hemingways Abenteuer eines jungen Mannes

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      Paul Newman opposed sound looping the picture, stating it interfered with the actors' performances, so a small (for that time) chest microphone was developed that eliminated around eighty percent of dialog looping, and saved its associated post-production costs as well.
    • Patzer
      When the Wife (Bloom) is fighting Juan (Newman), she falls and hits the camera rig, causing the picture to shake a little.
    • Zitate

      Con Man: [Sarcastically to the Prospector] I never forget a face, young man, but in your case I'll make an exception.

    • Crazy Credits
      Except for the title and company name, the beginning of the movie has no opening credits.
    • Verbindungen
      Featured in MGM 40th Anniversary (1964)

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ

    • How long is The Outrage?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 1965 (Westdeutschland)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Sprachen
      • Englisch
      • Spanisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • The Outrage
    • Drehorte
      • Old Tucson - 201 S. Kinney Road, Tucson, Arizona, USA
    • Produktionsfirma
      • Martin Ritt Productions
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Budget
      • 3.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      1 Stunde 36 Minuten
    • Farbe
      • Black and White
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 2.39 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.